GQ goes barely legal with Hayden and Rihanna

on

Look, I don’t consider myself

a prude. Sure, I sometimes furiously fly my feminist flag, but otherwise I’m pretty hard to

shock. And I’m the last person on the planet to tell consenting adults

what they should and shouldn’t do in the privacy of their own homes.

Still, when I saw these pictures of Rihanna and Hayden Panettiere

for the latest issue of GQ, my only thought was “Ewww.” Like,

seriously, ewww.

Now, it’s not just the

poses that give me pause. It’s the context. Ah, isn’t it always

the context? Let’s start with Rihanna. The magazine took the 19-year-old

pop star and bent her over the knee of 30-year-old fellow singer Robin

Thicke, whose hand is mid-spank. Nope, nothing creepy about that.

And

nothing creepy about these either.

And then there is Hayden. Cute,

blonde, just-turned-18 Hayden was named Obsession of the

Year
by GQ.

Which means that up until her birthday in August, she was the magazine’s

underage obsession of the year. But even if I gave them the benefit

of the doubt for holding off until she was legal, I can’t give them

a pass for posing her in with such Lolita-like lasciviousness. And,

again, it’s all about the context. A young girl in a see-through

nightie holding a teddy bear with teen-idol posters on the wall? This

is this the kind of women the men at GQ obsess about?

What bothers me the most is

these shots are for GQ, a magazine for men and — if the title

is to be believed — gentlemen at that. So this isn’t a magazine for

teenagers or young men like Maxim and FHM.

It’s for full-grown adults who should know better than to fantasize

about teenage girls. And they should definitely know better than to

so grossly objectify and infantilize them. And I’m not the only one who thinks it’s gross. This is

Gentlemen’s Quarterly
, after all, not Barely Legal. So, what

do you think? Am I being a prude? Or do you share my ewww?

More you may like