Interview With Eileen Gallagher
AE: Can you give me an example of something — a story line, perhaps —
something you're looking forward to a second chance on? And another part of it is, we love the camp elements, but if it gets too campy, that doesn't work, and maybe in later seasons it got a bit over the top, too camp. It can also be very small things. In the very first episode, we introduced a new story three-quarters of the way in with an older woman coming into the prison with hygiene problems, and that story structure, that story at the end, didn't merge with the other stories particularly well. We can see how we could do Episode 1 a little more successfully. There are small things like that, and then there are big directional things towards the end in Series 5, and I think 7 and 8. But for my money, I think the first three series in particular, which were the Nikki-Helen years, defined it. The tone was perfect, and I'd like to see that reproduced as far as we can. These are really fantastic writers — you know their work — and if anyone can enhance it, I think they will.
AE: With the Nikki and Helen story line, you had to make adjustments as
you went along, based on the actresses and their contracts and various other
issues. Is it your plan to follow the story line as it turned out, or is there
leeway in that? I think you know that when Simone decided to leave, we were really keen that for the first time in television, a lesbian love story would end happily. The history of lesbian love stories in movies and television is that they end in tragedy because they're punished for being lesbians, and we wanted to end our story happily. We did discuss keeping Nikki on and have Helen in the background, and we just couldn't find a way that would be believable and happy. The only alternative was that we have them going off in the sunset together. It was a good run of 39 hours. But absolutely we don't have to do that the same way again.
Simone Lahbib (left) and Mandana Jones
AE: I believe Alan Ball once said that it used to require courage for
actors to portray gay characters, and now it reveals a distinct lack of courage
if they're not willing to portray gay
characters. It seems to me your show and Simone and Mandana [Jones']
portrayals may have helped make that statement true. It's interesting. I always think that broadcasters are much more behind the curve than the audience. Broadcasters are more nervous about the audience's reaction, and we got the most fantastic audience reaction to Bad Girls from day one. And to be fair, ITV didn't try to tone it down at all. They thought it was very brave. They were probably nervous about the reaction, but they never tried to tone it down. We had live web chats all the time, and hundreds of people writing in, and the ones that made me most proud were the middle-aged women writing in who said, "I never thought I'd be so tolerant towards lesbians and prisoners and feel the connections and sympathy I have." And mothers talking to daughters about being gay, and daughters talking to mothers. We're just really proud of creating that. It's amazing what drama can do.
AE: Speaking of the fans, you create very big characters in general,
and certainly with Nikki and Helen you created iconic characters. Are you
concerned about the comparisons when you bring those characters directly over
to American TV?
AE: A number of shows have been transferred from Britain to the U.S. Do
you have any models that you look to for how to do it right, or perhaps what to
avoid? |
Recent blog posts
New forum topicsActive Topics |


