News, Reviews & Commentary on Lesbian and Bisexual women in Entertainment and the Media

Review of “The Children's Hour”

Warning: This review contains several spoilers for the film.

William Wyler's 1961 film version of Lillian Hellman's brilliant play The Children's Hour is a stark rendition of an age-old tale. It is a story that even Wyler felt the need to tell twice — once in 1936, as These Three, and then again 25 years later, under its original title. It is a story of innuendo, rumor, power, jealousy, blackmail, secrets, cardigans (I'll return to that later) and lesbians. Of course, the L-word is never mentioned.

It was 1961, after all, and America had not yet been introduced to power dykes or lipstick lesbians.

Martha Dobie (Shirley MacLaine) and Karen Wright (Audrey Hepburn) are co-heads of a private school for girls. Martha resembles a favorite P.E. teacher, complete with an easy-to-manage hairdo, sensible shoes and her constant companion, the cardigan. Karen is stunning. Audrey Hepburn's neck alone is worth watching; her hair is swept in an Oscar-worthy up-do, and her clothing is decidedly more form-fitting. Get the picture? Even those with only a gaydar learner's permit can see where this is going.

Martha and Karen's school is thriving, and the women often trade glances of deep affection and satisfaction. Trouble, however, wastes no time insinuating itself into their bliss. The first sign of discord is Martha's thinly veiled hostility toward Karen's fiancé, Dr. Joe Cardin (played by an earnest James Garner). Then we meet the quintessential incarnation of puerile evilness, Mary Tilford (Karen Balkin). Mary is a spoiled bully of a student who, in her quest for revenge, lust for power and sociopathic addiction to lying, sets in motion the central events of the film.

After suffering a well-deserved punishment from our heroines, Mary snakes her way back into her grandmother's (who happens to be a major benefactor of the school) good graces by whispering something in her ear about her two teachers. But even at this point, the viewer is not privy to the secret that dare not speak its name.

It turns out that Mary saw something innocent and heard something out of context. She weaves them together for destruction, and destroy she does. Martha and Karen are single; Karen seems reluctant to set a wedding date; Martha and Karen are devoted to each other; and then there is Martha's jealousy of Joe. The obvious conclusion, based on the word of a conniving, malevolent child, becomes gospel. The local population judges and condemns the two women for behavior described as “unnatural.” The accusation sticks, and a rumor masquerades as truth.

The film is shot in black and white, which accentuates the emotions portrayed. There are no big sets, product placement (unless you count cardigans) or special effects. MacLaine and Hepburn do not deliver Academy Award-winning acting, but the groundbreaking nature of the film is undeniable. The lesbian stereotyping is irrefutable, as is the reluctance on the part of all the characters to utter the unmentionable moniker of “lesbian.” Personal Best, Desert Hearts and sweeps week lesbian kisses were not even a glimmer in some starving producer's eye when Wyler made this movie. This was the era of Kennedy's Camelot. This was brave.

Shirley MacLaine's Martha is tragic almost from the beginning. Her devotion to Karen is absolute, and her subsequent anguish is heartbreaking. Falling in love with one's best friend and the ensuing discovery of the true nature of that love is a story we lesbians like to hear and tell over and over again. That repulsive little girl's lie — not to mention her melodramatic, bulging eyeballs — revealed a truth, albeit an unwelcome one. Toward the end of the film, an emotionally annihilated Martha confesses to Karen, “She found the lie with the ounce of truth.”

Establishing a trend that continues in Hollywood to this day, the lesbian meets a tragic end. In the vernacular of the 1960s, The Children's Hour is a veritable pu pu platter of themes, which are blended and dissected with varying degrees of success. The film remains significant today for its mainstream exposition of lesbian love along with the horror of prejudice, intimidation and shame.

Bottom line: Grab a cardigan and watch this movie. Make a mai tai — you will need it.

Phantom's picture

A little bit of this movie

A little bit of this movie was shown in the first scene of the first part of If These Walls Could Talk 2, when the two elderly lesbian ladies are in the theater together, am I right?

I always loved Audrey Hepburn (for her acting and well... for her acting) and although I wanted to order My Fair Lady a while ago, I guess I'll have to make it now a double-order.
Harpy's picture

See it!

Yes, they were watching The Children's Hour.  :)

The Children's Hour really was ahead of it's time and is still worth watching today.

Plus, it has that cheesy 50's/60's movie overly dramatic music and long pauses for that "dramatic" emphasis.  So, even during a serious movie, you can still crack up at times.

Joking aside, I'd honestly rather watch The Children's Hour then most of the lesbian movies produced since.  There's very few lesbian-oriented movies I would recommend just because the vast majority are incredibly cheesy and have little substance.

lisa b in ne's picture

See it, own it, love it

You need to see this movie, own this move, and love this movie.  I have seen this movie a number of times and I love it.  I don't care about the stereotypes or the tragic end; rather I care about a movie being released in the 60's that even talked about such issues.  I am excited that big time stars of that time would be in such a movie.  If you have not seen this movie, you should, but don't just take my word for it.  It was nominated for 12 major movie awards including 3 Golden Globes and 5 Oscars.Now some might say that the tragic end was typical of Lesbian themed movies that are made in the hetero world, but I say, just like in real life, we can't always have the happy ride off into the sunset ending we would like to have.  Most importantly, anything other than that ending would have distracted from the movie and cheapened it.  
zenarcade's picture

I was hoping this would be reviewed by AE!

I own this film on DVD and I like it a lot.  As another poster said, it was ahead of it's time, and it's definitely worth watching.  The tragic ending may have become a cliché, but it was inevitable that the movie ended that way.

Donica's picture

Great movie

It's worth watching over and over. And I disagree with the reviewer: Shirley MacLaine is outstanding and should have at least been nominated for this performnace. Even in the beginning of the movie, watch MacLaine's bravura subtlety as she lets on with looks and gestures how utterly UNWELCOME James Garner is. Hepburn as Karen is just as convincing --why is it that she can't QUITE bring herself to set a date for the wedding? I've always wondered if her character didn't feel attraction as well.
lily_topphatt's picture

i've seen this movie and i

i've seen this movie and i always have a hard time watching the end....just breaks my heart.....but aside from that, it really is a good movie.
medicsonic's picture

It took me some time to find

It took me some time to find this film.. I'd seen it being watched by the characters of If These Walls Could Talk 2, but it was at an LGBT history event last year that I found what it was called and I just watched it about 3 weeks ago. I cried at several points..there was so much in it and I found the loyalty of Karen so great. I'm glad I watched it, very moving. :)
jlfong11's picture

I am just happy that this

I am just happy that this movie was and still is a success.  It shows that there may be hope for filmakers or dreamers who have a story such as this to tell and have it be known.  Especially with such a controversial topic in its day and unfortunatly is still "un-natural" to most people in the United States.  It may always be like that.  There are a lot of young woman, to this day, who do not accept who they are because they think it is "un-natural". This movie has inspired and will inspire more filmakers to make sure they let it be known in their movies that we are not "un-natural".   

peapoddy's picture

very worth watching

I can remember seeing the stage version of The Children's Hour when I was first coming to terms with my sexuality --- it packed a punch! I felt distraught and sad that this was the media's representation of lesbian feelings, well 7 years after seeing that play and since coming out, I can see that some things have changed and some haven't. There's still a sense of danger and tragedy to some stories of "the love we dare not speak of"  ('Lost and Delirious' I'm looking at you). But overall I've become less melodramatic about the whole gay thing, and hopefully more movies will follow suit. (Imagine Me & You).  Why is Piper Perabo the voice of lesbians anyway??

mcguire_stella's picture

we've come a long way

Just watched this tonight (for you netflixers its a 'watch instantly' movie) and was curious to see what AE had to say about it. I'm a little conflicted on the movie myself... i mean kudos for attempting to tackle a topic that was obviously delicate in 1960, and the turmoil that MacLaine's character is suffering is palpable at times (props to MacLaine), and Wyler's direction is quite sensitive. BUT! the movie is a total downer that is too ashamed to name what it is talking about. You gotta think that any young gay man or woman who saw this in the 60's would have run as fast as they could back into the closet. Still worth seeing now .. but make the Mai Tai a strong one.

User login

Recent comments

After Ellen home page on logo online