Australian Legislators Back Gay Rightshttp://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/26/world/asia/26australia.html?_r=1&ref=world a change is coming =)! Submitted by xxPhoenixx (329 posts) on November 26, 2008 - 10:27am. |
Recent blog posts
New forum topicsActive TopicsNew Comments
|


aww cool
we got another one on board for equality
the aussies, the canadians
...and most of western europe are way ahead of us.
of course...
I read the act today...
I read the act today... (Same-Sex Relationships (Equal Treatment in Commonwealth Laws—Superannuation) Bill 2008)
This ammends other commonwealth acts. Basicall anywhere that it is written "marrital relationship" to "couple relationship" and "husband/wife" is replaced with "Partner"
where partner is defined as:
partner: a person is the partner of another person if the two persons have a relationship as a couple (whether the persons are the same sex or different sexes).
The other good thing is i think they will back date it to the begining of this financial year.
Here is the Bills digest a dcoument that explaines all sides of the political arguement.
http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/BD/2008-09/09bd020.pdf
here is the explainatory memorandum
http://www.comlaw.gov.au/ComLaw/Legislation/Bills1.nsf/0/EB6210E16A9F57CECA25745900260637/$file/08107em.pdf
if interested.
it isn't marrige and adoption isn't allowed yet, although the wording looks a like there is a little wiggle room. If a child is the "product of the couple relationship" is strange wording. But so far at least one parent must be the biological parent.