I'm really glad to  hear that most of Hillary's supporters aren't like the ones who go to that Hillary counts website. That's akin to biting off your nose to spite your face, IMHO.

I didn't say  since Super Tuesday, I said since February- when Obama won 11 straight races and the math was no longer realistic for Hillary. You must be using Hillary math rather than the math the rest of the country uses. While things may have been back and forth after Obama had the nomination virtually locked up, that didn't allow Hillary to catch up to him. Hillary had a substantial lead in super delegates at that time, because of political favors owed to the Clintons and name recognition. She lost many of those to Obama and undeclared super delegates started coming out for him. The only one person who changed from Obama was a person from Guam who Hillary had switch to Obama and then back to her to "prove" that the super D's could also leave from him. 

I hate to inform you that just because we disagree, that doesn't make you einstein and me forrest gump. Using capital letters to make your point doesn';t make it true.

The Democratic party is no longer the "clinton" party, Barack is now the leader of the party. The Clinton demise began when Nancy Pelosi took over as majority leader and they wanted someone else. The presidential candidate is generally considered the leader of the democratic party.

I have no idea what your beef about equal rights is and this election is. Hillary and some of her militant supporters have been imagining slights left and right. She's only using the fact that these perceived slights are because she's a woman to rile up a certain segment of the female population. If she thought the perceived slights could rile up people who live in Arkansas, she's use that to play the victim card.

There aren't enough women in government and in high power positions in USA government. There aren't enough blacks or gays or asians or muslims or jews or hispanics and just about every other minority, because for a very long time white christian men were the norm. I've been a political junkie since I was 4 years old, 40 years. I remember Bobby Kennedy's and MLK's deaths and how bummed my grandmother was when Nixon was elected. I have seen the percentage of women and other minorities grow in government. Has it grown fast enough? No, of course not, but societal change takes time.

Simply put, he can't.

I've been on the losing side of some heartbreaking campaigns, so I can appreciate, more than most, the necessity for a grieving period for Hillary Clinton supporters (it's fair, though, to hold the candidate and her staff to a different standard). But as you mourn her loss (I mean, you, generally, not just specifically Harpy), I hope that you take some time to appreciate the reasons why Barack Obama won and Clinton lost. To say that Obama would be "stupid" for not adding her to the ticket suggests to me that there's not a real understanding of the reasons why Obama won and Clinton lost.

Obama had a very strong message about change in Washington--not just in terms of changing the political party, but in fundamentally altering the way that "the game" is played. Obama promised to end the old style of politics...to, as Scott McClellan might say, end the permanent campaign that goes on in DC. He won, in part, because of that message.

To add Clinton to the ticket would be the politically expedient thing to do, I suppose, but it'd undercut one of the foundation of his campaign. His claim to represent new politics would be fundamentally flawed....

...and I, for one, would not look on him more favorably for doing so.

For those doing electoral math on the back of a napkin (h/t West Wing): Clinton would probably help Obama most in Florida and Ohio. I can think of a handful of Democrats who'd aid Obama in those same states. She'd likely hurt him in Virginia, Colorado and, possibly, New Mexico....so. for those looking for an electoral argument against including Clinton, there it is.

-----

Geoffrey: You fool! As if it matters how a man falls down.
Richard: When the fall is all that is left, it matters a great deal.

- The Lion in Winter

I don't think it would be a good idea to have an Obama/(Hillary) Clinton ticket. Look at the way the Clintons campaigned against him. I can't see Hillary, and definitely not Bill, playing second fiddle to Obama. They would try to outshine him.

An Obama/Clinton ticket sounds good at first, but the more one thinks about it the more one realizes how bad it would be and the folly of it all.

It would definitely not be good judgement on his part nor on that of his advisors.