Navigation |
Republicans for ObamaI'm not a Republican but I found this article and this site pretty interesting. I think Obama would probably be the best nominee because he seems to have this ability to unite people and to inspire and this seems to reinforce that. So what do you think? Is Barack Obama the best hope for the Democrats?
http://www.republicansforobama.org/?q=node/8 Republicans defect to the Obama campDISILLUSIONED supporters of President George W Bush are defecting to Barack Obama, the Democratic senator for Illinois, as the White House candidate with the best chance of uniting a divided nation. Tom Bernstein went to Yale University with Bush and co-owned the Texas Rangers baseball team with him. In 2004 he donated the maximum $2,000 to the president’s reelection campaign and gave $50,000 to the Republican National Committee. This year he is switching his support to Obama. He is one of many former Bush admirers who find the Democrat newcomer appealing. Matthew Dowd, Bush’s chief campaign strategist in 2004, announced last month that he was disillusioned with the war in Iraq and the president’s “my way or the highway” style of leadership ? the first member of Bush’s inner circle to denounce the leader’s performance in office. Although Dowd has yet to endorse a candidate, he said the only one he liked was Obama. “I think we should design campaigns that appeal, not to 51% of the people, but bring the country together as a whole,” Dowd said. But last week a surprising new name joined the chorus of praise for the antiwar Obama ? that of Robert Kagan, a leading neoconservative and co-founder of the Project for the New American Century in the late 1990s, which called for the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. Kagan is an informal foreign policy adviser to the Republican senator John McCain, who remains the favoured neoconservative choice for the White House because of his backing for the troops in Iraq. But in an article in the Washington Post, Kagan wrote approvingly that a keynote speech by Obama at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs was “pure John Kennedy”, a neocon hero of the cold war. In his speech, Obama called for an increase in defence spending and an extra 65,000 soldiers and 27,000 marines to “stay on the offense” against terrorism and ensure America had “the strongest, best-equipped military in the world”. He talked about building democracies, stopping weapons of mass destruction and the right to take unilateral action to protect US “vital interests” if necessary, as well as the importance of building alliances. “Personally, I liked it,” Kagan wrote. Disagreements on the war have not stopped John Martin, a Navy reservist and founder of the website Republicans for Obama, from supporting the antiwar senator. He joined the military after the Iraq war and is about to be deployed to Afghanistan. “I disagree with Obama on the war but I don’t think it is a test of his patriotism,” Martin says. “Obama has a message of hope for the country.” Financiers have also been oiling Obama’s campaign. In Chicago, his home town, John Canning, a “Bush pioneer” and investment banker who pledged to raise $100,000 for the president in 2004, has given up on the Republicans. “I know lots of my friends in this business are disenchanted and are definitely looking for something different,” he said. Not to be outdone, Hillary Clinton has many Republican defectors of her own, including John Mack, chief executive of Morgan Stanley, who helped raise $200,000 for the president’s reelection, qualifying him as a “Bush ranger”. He said last week that he was impressed by Clinton’s expertise. “I know we’re associated mainly with the Republicans but we’ve always gone for the individual,” Mack said. According to figures compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics in Washington, Obama and Clinton have vacuumed up more than $750,000 (£375,000) in individual contributions from former Bush donors. Some of the donations reflect the natural tendency of those with power to shift to the likely White House winner. Penny Pritzker, the staggeringly successful head of fundraising for Obama, voted for John Kerry, the 2004 Democratic candidate, but also donated that year to Bush. As she was a head of the family-run Hyatt hotel chain, it was considered a prudent move. With the Democrats widely expected to win in 2008, Clinton’s status as frontrunner is encouraging Wall Street money to migrate to her, while Obama may be picking up some mischievous “Stop Hillary” donations from still-loyal Republicans. But there is plenty of genuine enthusiasm to go around. A poll released by Rasmussen last week showed Obama overtaking Clinton for the first time by 32% to 30%, although another poll by Quinnepiac showed her with a 14-point lead over the Illinois senator, her nearest rival. The current issue of the New Yorker contains a profile of Obama, which highlights his appeal to conservatives. For his optimism about the future, Obama has been dubbed the “black Ronald Reagan”. He frequently challenges the black community to support two-parent families and encourage school students, instead of criticising them for “acting white”.
Submitted by incurablygay (108 posts) on January 9, 2008 - 3:50am. |
User login
Recent blog posts
Recent comments
|


Thanks for posting this, IG!
Obama '08
I believe so, yes.
From a purely political perspective, Obama's the only one beating all the Republican candidates in head-to-head match-ups right now. Plus, and this is something that's not talked about often enough, there is an inherent benefit to having a candidate that Republicans disagree with, but think of positively...regardless of who wins the Republican nomination, there are going to be a segment of the of their Party's base that's very, very unhappy. If they don't hate the Democrat, it could depress turn-out all across the country.
Also, if Obama's the nominee, Michael Bloomberg probably won't run as an independent...and I think he's liberal enough on social issues to siphon off some votes from the Democratic nominee.
Sidenote #1: If you're interested in getting a good take on why a conservative might back Obama, I'd recommend reading gay conservative blogger Andrew Sullivan's endorsement of Obama and his post Why Republicans Respect Obama.
But those are the politics of it. Here's what I actually think:
Chances are, I’m not going to agree with any presidential contender 100 percent of the time…and as much as I want to spend time figuring out which candidate I agree with the most, I also want to know what happens when I don’t agree. One of the big lessons I’ll take away from the Bush administration’s ineptitude is the danger of hubris. I’m tired of politicians–Democrat or Republican–who are so convinced that their cause is just and their position is right that they insulate themselves from dissenting voices (and in, extreme cases, bastardize those dissenting voices).
I understand that a lot of Democrats are mad at the way this country's been run for the last 7 year and I get that--I totally get that--but I don't think the answer to that is to say we're going to do the same...except this time, it's Republicans who'll get shut out. If all we aspire to is to govern on behalf of the 51 percent of the population that puts you in office, what makes the Democratic Party better than the Republicans? We have to offer more to the American people...
I know it's cliche, but I truly believe that there's more that unites us than divides us and if there's a candidate who sees the value in reminding us all of that, then he's my guy.
Sidenote #2: I should also point out that this is just one of many, many reasons for my support of Obama. I can certainly offer something more substantative--like why I think his health care plan is better or how his foreign policy vision aligns with my own--but the philosophical point, I think is more important.
Thanks The Emperor Has and
Thanks The Emperor Has and Pecola for the comments. I'm not sure yet who I'd vote for (Democrat definitely, Obama most likely) and I'm still finding more about the candidates and their policies. But since I do kind of have a month I'm going to research this out well. I just know that our nominee will be making history whoever it is.
I think the biggest Republican challenge we'll have is from McCain and i have a feeling he will win the Republican nomination.
I'm over negative campaigns by the candidates and i'm looking for positivity. The fact that I'm posting so much about politics is freaking me out but being involved is a good thing.