Having seen the first episode, I tell you the shows seem pretty similar. I kept getting the SATC vibe the whole time I was watching. Cashmere is SATC set in the high power, fast paced world that is business at the executive level, plus a kid or two and a lesbian story line. It's high fashion, glamor, the women get are each others support system. The mise en scene or setting is the same: Manhattan, so we see a lot of flagging down cabs etc (very Manhattenesque behavior, tres posh). The women of the Cashmere mafia definitely have some similarities with SATC in terms of their personal lives. It seems like it's gonna be a bumpy road for most of the women like in SATC, but the lesbian story line looks promising. In fact, it was probably the most genuine portion of the 1 hour premiere; it was most relatable I guess. I like that this is a show about women at the very top of the business industry which is really the key difference between CM and SATC (and I feel like the writers will do the concept justice) so I'll keep watching to see how things develop; And this is high praise coming from someone who wasn't a die-hard, gung-ho fan of SATC, though I did enjoy it whenever I got the chance to see it.
It's produced by one of the creators of Sex and the City! The Pilot was
written by a writer from Sex and the City! Haven't you been paying
attention to the media hype?
Starr and Bushnell (The originator of SATC) are fueding because she
pushed Lipstick Jungle on that other network while he pushed Cashmere
on ABC.
There are people of color on Cashmere, it's a more realistic portrayal of New York City.
I watched the preview of Lipstick Jungle and I choose Cashmere!
Well, I do live in NYC, and I am a person of color so I agree, the portrayal of the women in the show is representative of the diversity here, but some of things shown just aren't like that in Manhattan (parking anytime, not so crowded streets? Yeah, right.)
And as for the media hype, I didn't know until after watching th pilot that the shows shared the same creator, so it is clearer to me that he did kinda recycle his material, considering I got that SATC vibe when I didn't know [not that its a bad thing].
Dara added a snarky comment about that in her recap saying:
"Is it illegal to steal your own material? Can he sue himself?"
That's all I was trying to say!
The second episode looked even better though, and I feel like it's evolving into it's own show. The SATC thing wasn't there as much, though it probably will resurface from time to time.
I was born in New York. I moved to Connecticut and would drive into the city on weekends, and found on street parking 90% of the time. The only time I ever paid for parking was when I dined in midtown. When I would go clubbing in the village I never paid for parking. Yes the automobile HAD been invented. So even the parking thing I didn't find completely unbelievable.
Cashmere Mafia's writing was awful and very unrealistic. I was laughing at some of the moments. I'll be tuning in though, just to give it a chance. It can still get better. Alicia is gorgeous and it has handled Caitlin/Alicia pretty well. It was the only part that I liked.
Be specific, give details. Also SATC was on HBO HULLO! This is network television so of course it's not gonna be as sharp as if it were Pay TV.
What was so unrealistic about the writing?
The mere fact that in your comment you fail to articulate your complaints clearly really casts doubt on whether or not you even know what you are writing about, frankly I don't think so, I believe that you just wanted to see your words onscreen.
Although this show is billed as "fantasy" I live in a city were powerful women congregate regularly so there are elements of REALISM in this show.
What is totally UNREAL is a show like Lipstick Jungle which has NO people of color in a show based in New York City of all places, and is about powerful women yet NONE of them are lesbian? and ALL are of European descent? Now that is UNREAL!
everyone is entitled to her own opinion. you can say 'i don't agree', but pls refrain from saying things such as "i believe that you just wanted to see your words onscreen" and (on a separate post) "Personally it is a fact that people who don't articulate reasons (like the person in the comment about concerning the writing) don't know what they are actually complaining about."
thanks.
"didn't i throw you out of a window? " - jessica/nikki, heroes
Stating a fact is NOT a personal criticism. I received an advanced degree studying why people do the things they do. If a person doesn't like somerthing then it helps the people they are telling or writing this to what their reasons are. Here's an example: "I don't like Lipstick Jungle because it has a racially homogenous cast (for the most part) and this is not representative of women in New York. I mean Look at Kimora Lee CEO of Baby Phat. She is NOT only a powerful business woman but is also biracial Asian/African American(?)." See what I did? I substantiated my argument.
Many people don't write or watch television in context, and only post so they can see their words onscreen and in print, that is not a criticism it's a fact. Where the criticism may lie is in my comment that I did not think she even knew what she was writing about. I will concede that was a little harsh but she has not articulated her reasons and now you have jumped in the middle of the fray like a protector of some sort.
What happened to free expression? I did not state that she is (insert derogatory name here).
Hey if one wants to play with the big girls then be prepared to "parry" with the big girls. Thats "Parry" NOT "Party."
Many people don't write or watch television in context, and only post so they can see their words onscreen and in print, that is not a criticism it's a fact. Where the criticism may lie is in my comment that I did not think she even knew what she was writing about.
Actually it's a generalisation, especially considering you don't know the person you're criticising, thus can't exactly know what her motives for posting were/are.
Quote:
I will concede that was a little harsh but she has not articulated her reasons and now you have jumped in the middle of the fray like a protector of some sort.
This is what forum moderators do - we are here to be "protectors" of sorts and make sure that everyone is able to voice their own opinions without fear of being chastised. We all know by now (from this thread and others) that you love Cashmere Mafia. But you're extremely defensive towards anyone who has a different opinion and, perhaps, maybe doesn't like the show as much as you do. Most forum moderators tend to keep a check on this type of kneejerk defensiveness because it isn't conducive to the "discussion" aspect of forums; if people think their opinions (well-formed or not) will be immediately critiqued and attacked, they are less likely to post. Personally I prefer an active community to a boring one that contains only one or two people's opinions (valid or not).
Now if this were a heavy academic discussion, that'd be a different beast. But really all we're talking about here is, "Hey, what'd you think of the show?" And some people didn't like it. Oh well.
So you're free to continue to post your thoughts (free expression and whatnot)... but so is everyone else.
True happiness, we are told, consists in getting out of one's self, but the point is not only to get out, you must stay out; and to stay out you must have some absorbing errand. -Henry James
I wasn't really a fan of Sex and the City. I'd watched pieces of episodes, but not one in its entirety so I may just be biased, but I was never able to identify with the characters on that show. With Cashmere Mafia I felt like the characters were a little more human and slightly less camped-up--though the comedic element to the show is most definitely still there (which is another great thing about the show)--which makes the characters more accessible.
I'll have to disagree with Caitlin and say that I thought the writing was pretty good. I wouldn't say it was perfect--parts of it were kind of hokey, and not in an intentional way--but how many TV shows have perfect writing anyway? All in all, I'm giving it my thumbs up, and I'll continue to watch. Hopefully more episodes get produced once the darned WGA strike is through.
I really enjoyed that episode and am looking forward to the next episode. Personally it is a fact that people who don't articulate reasons (like the person in the comment about concerning the writing) don't know what they are actually complaining about. The episode was WRITTEN by a writer from Sex and the City!
SATC is sharper in terms of direction and dialogue but since it's only 20 mins each episode and each episode focuses on a topic so that explains. However, as Hope has said, I feel the characters on CM are more relateable and less extreme than those on SATC. I definitely prefer the CM gang to the SATC one (though no one on CM is quite on the level of Samantha's awesomeness!). Just take a look at these Fantastic Four:
1) Mia: She's not a whiny or self-absorbed b1tch like Carrie. Strong, career-driven and uncompromising, Lucy Liu totally kicks SJP's ass.
2) Caitlin: waaayyy cuter and not as annoying as Charlotte. I always find that Kristin Davis tries too hard to be cute. Bonnie Somerville is just effortlessly adorable.
3) Zoe: a more endearing working mother than Miranda. Cynthia Nixon is great but Frances O'Connor is such a sweetie.
4) Juliet: OK, the only one in the group that I'm not feeling yet. I don't see much similarity between her and Sam apart from her being a bit sexually adventurous. Plus, Kim Catrall is a TV legend in my book so there's no match here.
Oh, I also find that CM treats the work and the minorities more maturely than SATC. Sure what we see on CM is more glamourous than reality but at least we see the women work and they do have problems at work. There's a non-stereotypical Asian in the leading role, a Latina/Asian lesbian (bi?) and a black assistant. While there are a bunch of gays on SATC, they are just there to play the "fabulous, well-dressed" gay stereotype, yet are not given any well-developed storyline. CM has an interesting lesbian (bi?) main character, her attraction to women is genuine and not a ratings stunt.
I say Cashmere Mafia FTW!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
""My love life is terrible. The last time I was inside a woman was when I visited the Statue of Liberty."
...is an overall more watchable show for me than Sex and the City. I really couldn't stand the looks/personalities of anyone in SATC, and the storyline was bo-ring!
Cashmere is sorta boring, but not nearly as much. There are some cast members I don't really like to look at, but at least it's not painful to do so. I like a couple of the characters, and it might be possible for me to eventually like the others. The lesbian storyline is being done exceptionally well for a TV program.
In summary, I hated SATC, but almost sorta like Cashmere Mafia.
"This is what forum moderators do - we are here to be "protectors" of
sorts and make sure that everyone is able to voice their own opinions."
Actually from an academic perspective the word: "Opinion" means that a person doesn't know the subject they are talking about. So do I travel back in time and tell my professor that he probably hurt someone's feelings? Come On Now! Seems less like a "protector and more like a babysitter if you ask me.
"without fear of being chastised. We all know by now (from this thread
and others) that you love Cashmere Mafia.
But you're extremely defensive towards anyone who has a different
opinion and, perhaps, maybe doesn't like the show as much as you do."
No I am proactive. See I am a writer if there is something wrong with the shows writing "SPELL It Out" State what it is, then write the networks and TELL them. A person CAN make an impact, I have and I'm just one person yet I sent a message to a late nite talk show and an episode that had aired serveral times that I found offensive was edited and reaired a 3rd time two days after the host received my email.
I don't care if if another person dislikes the show. Many excellent shows have been cancelled because moronic Americans badmouth them. I guess I am a member of what the President conned people into believing existed: The Intellectual Elite and proud of it!
What I am saying is that I want to see substance. I once received a message from a member who did not like a comment I made. So I articulately stated my rationale for why I posted that specific comment, and do you know what she wrote next because she didn't know how to respond? She wrote: "You're funny." I gave a sociological basis for making the statemnent she found offensive and all she could respond was: "You're funny" Nothing else. WTF?!"
In conclusion so what if everyone knows I love the show? Thank the goddess for a break from TLW I am so over that show but it doesn't mean that just because everyone knows how much I like the show that I am not going to post about it anymore.
I am so over that show but it doesn't mean that just because everyone
knows how much I like the show that I am not going to post about it
anymore.
Nobody asked you to stop posting about the show. We asked you to allow others to do the same and voice their moronic, uneducated, non-elite opinions too - which they are entitled to have - without being the subject of personal attacks. I'm sorry this message was too opaque; next time we'll try to be clearer.
Now, let's get back to the topic: Cashmere Mafia vs. Sex and the City!
True happiness, we are told, consists in getting out of one's self, but the point is not only to get out, you must stay out; and to stay out you must have some absorbing errand. -Henry James
As a longtime viewer of SATC, i will admit that it is one of my all-time favorite shows. I agree that the characters can sometimes be a little self absorbed or annoying, but I always felt that the incredible writing (I can work a SATC quote into almost any conversation) and the fashion forwardness were the strong points of the show. And even if the characters individually were a little out there...together they were genius.
That said, I think I may like CM more. I'd, of course, like to see more of it before I make that certain, but I agree that the characters were more relatable. And it's NICE to see strong businesswomen on tv. And I'm so pleased that they made Caitlin gay... I find it extremely refreshing and realistic. I think we all remember when Samantha decided she was a lesbian...but somehow i like this better ;) Maybe because Caitlin and Alicia are adorable together?
In my opinion the only real similarities these two shows share is the setting (but a lot of shows are set in New York) and the fact that it's about 4 women. The tones of the two shows are completely different and I actually think I will like Cashmere Mafia more.
I found SATC very formulaic, especially at the beginning. Every episode was about the same thing (each character searches for Mr Right). I know Samantha was an exeption but any feminist ground she might have gained was counteracted by Charlotte's character. I always heard that Charlotte wasn't in the articles/books but that the suits asked the producers to put her in as the moral centre.
I also think there was too much emphasis on fashion in SATC. The women in Cashmere do wear nice clothes but they don't ra-rah about clothes all the time in the same superficial and frivolous way as Carrie Bradshaw.
P.S. I can't stand Sarah Jessica Parker. Can you tell?
I don't think they are that similar as well... Aside from the fact that is about 4 women living in NY, wearing expensive clothes.
For me, Cashmere Mafia isn't really working. I can't feel the chemistry between the main characters, oppose to S&TC, which is one of my favorite shows ever.
I'm gonna give it another try to CM but if things stay the way they are I think I'll be just reading the reviews and recaps, just like South opf Nowhere (it's funnier, and faster). :p
Rarely do the networks rerun the first episodes of Sex, but if you recall, they weren't as entertaining as the later seasons. It took a few episodes for the writers to develop the characters and for the girls to really find that timing that cracked us up so much. Point being, I say give it some time to gel before comparing this new baby series to the veteran show. Personally, I find CM loses my attention often...until I hear Lucy Liu's voice then I'm back. :)
Well this is going to be a doozie
Having seen the first episode, I tell you the shows seem pretty similar. I kept getting the SATC vibe the whole time I was watching. Cashmere is SATC set in the high power, fast paced world that is business at the executive level, plus a kid or two and a lesbian story line. It's high fashion, glamor, the women get are each others support system. The mise en scene or setting is the same: Manhattan, so we see a lot of flagging down cabs etc (very Manhattenesque behavior, tres posh). The women of the Cashmere mafia definitely have some similarities with SATC in terms of their personal lives. It seems like it's gonna be a bumpy road for most of the women like in SATC, but the lesbian story line looks promising. In fact, it was probably the most genuine portion of the 1 hour premiere; it was most relatable I guess. I like that this is a show about women at the very top of the business industry which is really the key difference between CM and SATC (and I feel like the writers will do the concept justice) so I'll keep watching to see how things develop; And this is high praise coming from someone who wasn't a die-hard, gung-ho fan of SATC, though I did enjoy it whenever I got the chance to see it.
Will blog for food!
OF COURSE The show is similar to SATC
It's produced by one of the creators of Sex and the City! The Pilot was written by a writer from Sex and the City! Haven't you been paying attention to the media hype?
Starr and Bushnell (The originator of SATC) are fueding because she pushed Lipstick Jungle on that other network while he pushed Cashmere on ABC.
There are people of color on Cashmere, it's a more realistic portrayal of New York City.
I watched the preview of Lipstick Jungle and I choose Cashmere!
Well, I do live in NYC, and
Well, I do live in NYC, and I am a person of color so I agree, the portrayal of the women in the show is representative of the diversity here, but some of things shown just aren't like that in Manhattan (parking anytime, not so crowded streets? Yeah, right.)
And as for the media hype, I didn't know until after watching th pilot that the shows shared the same creator, so it is clearer to me that he did kinda recycle his material, considering I got that SATC vibe when I didn't know [not that its a bad thing].
Dara added a snarky comment about that in her recap saying:
"Is it illegal to steal your own material? Can he sue himself?"
That's all I was trying to say!
The second episode looked even better though, and I feel like it's evolving into it's own show. The SATC thing wasn't there as much, though it probably will resurface from time to time.
Will blog for food!
Well you live in New York
never really cared for SATC
SATC way better
What was wrong with the writing?
Be specific, give details. Also SATC was on HBO HULLO! This is network television so of course it's not gonna be as sharp as if it were Pay TV.
What was so unrealistic about the writing?
The mere fact that in your comment you fail to articulate your complaints clearly really casts doubt on whether or not you even know what you are writing about, frankly I don't think so, I believe that you just wanted to see your words onscreen.
Although this show is billed as "fantasy" I live in a city were powerful women congregate regularly so there are elements of REALISM in this show.
What is totally UNREAL is a show like Lipstick Jungle which has NO people of color in a show based in New York City of all places, and is about powerful women yet NONE of them are lesbian? and ALL are of European descent? Now that is UNREAL!
pls refrain from making personal criticisms
everyone is entitled to her own opinion. you can say 'i don't agree', but pls refrain from saying things such as "i believe that you just wanted to see your words onscreen" and (on a separate post) "Personally it is a fact that people who don't articulate reasons (like the person in the comment about concerning the writing) don't know what they are actually complaining about."
thanks.
"didn't i throw you out of a window? " - jessica/nikki, heroes
Excuse me but...
Stating a fact is NOT a personal criticism. I received an advanced degree studying why people do the things they do. If a person doesn't like somerthing then it helps the people they are telling or writing this to what their reasons are. Here's an example: "I don't like Lipstick Jungle because it has a racially homogenous cast (for the most part) and this is not representative of women in New York. I mean Look at Kimora Lee CEO of Baby Phat. She is NOT only a powerful business woman but is also biracial Asian/African American(?)." See what I did? I substantiated my argument.
Many people don't write or watch television in context, and only post so they can see their words onscreen and in print, that is not a criticism it's a fact. Where the criticism may lie is in my comment that I did not think she even knew what she was writing about. I will concede that was a little harsh but she has not articulated her reasons and now you have jumped in the middle of the fray like a protector of some sort.
What happened to free expression? I did not state that she is (insert derogatory name here).
Hey if one wants to play with the big girls then be prepared to "parry" with the big girls. Thats "Parry" NOT "Party."
Frankly maybe you are coddling a bit too much.
cm
Actually it's a generalisation, especially considering you don't know the person you're criticising, thus can't exactly know what her motives for posting were/are.
This is what forum moderators do - we are here to be "protectors" of sorts and make sure that everyone is able to voice their own opinions without fear of being chastised. We all know by now (from this thread and others) that you love Cashmere Mafia. But you're extremely defensive towards anyone who has a different opinion and, perhaps, maybe doesn't like the show as much as you do. Most forum moderators tend to keep a check on this type of kneejerk defensiveness because it isn't conducive to the "discussion" aspect of forums; if people think their opinions (well-formed or not) will be immediately critiqued and attacked, they are less likely to post. Personally I prefer an active community to a boring one that contains only one or two people's opinions (valid or not).
Now if this were a heavy academic discussion, that'd be a different beast. But really all we're talking about here is, "Hey, what'd you think of the show?" And some people didn't like it. Oh well.
So you're free to continue to post your thoughts (free expression and whatnot)... but so is everyone else.
True happiness, we are told, consists in getting out of one's self, but the point is not only to get out, you must stay out; and to stay out you must have some absorbing errand. -Henry James
I personally really liked it.
I wasn't really a fan of Sex and the City. I'd watched pieces of episodes, but not one in its entirety so I may just be biased, but I was never able to identify with the characters on that show. With Cashmere Mafia I felt like the characters were a little more human and slightly less camped-up--though the comedic element to the show is most definitely still there (which is another great thing about the show)--which makes the characters more accessible.
I'll have to disagree with Caitlin and say that I thought the writing was pretty good. I wouldn't say it was perfect--parts of it were kind of hokey, and not in an intentional way--but how many TV shows have perfect writing anyway? All in all, I'm giving it my thumbs up, and I'll continue to watch. Hopefully more episodes get produced once the darned WGA strike is through.
I FULLY AGREE! I liked it also
I really enjoyed that episode and am looking forward to the next episode. Personally it is a fact that people who don't articulate reasons (like the person in the comment about concerning the writing) don't know what they are actually complaining about. The episode was WRITTEN by a writer from Sex and the City!
I want to see more of Alicia and Caitlin.
Cashmere Mafia wins
SATC is sharper in terms of direction and dialogue but since it's only 20 mins each episode and each episode focuses on a topic so that explains. However, as Hope has said, I feel the characters on CM are more relateable and less extreme than those on SATC. I definitely prefer the CM gang to the SATC one (though no one on CM is quite on the level of Samantha's awesomeness!). Just take a look at these Fantastic Four:
1) Mia: She's not a whiny or self-absorbed b1tch like Carrie. Strong, career-driven and uncompromising, Lucy Liu totally kicks SJP's ass.
2) Caitlin: waaayyy cuter and not as annoying as Charlotte. I always find that Kristin Davis tries too hard to be cute. Bonnie Somerville is just effortlessly adorable.
3) Zoe: a more endearing working mother than Miranda. Cynthia Nixon is great but Frances O'Connor is such a sweetie.
4) Juliet: OK, the only one in the group that I'm not feeling yet. I don't see much similarity between her and Sam apart from her being a bit sexually adventurous. Plus, Kim Catrall is a TV legend in my book so there's no match here.
Oh, I also find that CM treats the work and the minorities more maturely than SATC. Sure what we see on CM is more glamourous than reality but at least we see the women work and they do have problems at work. There's a non-stereotypical Asian in the leading role, a Latina/Asian lesbian (bi?) and a black assistant. While there are a bunch of gays on SATC, they are just there to play the "fabulous, well-dressed" gay stereotype, yet are not given any well-developed storyline. CM has an interesting lesbian (bi?) main character, her attraction to women is genuine and not a ratings stunt.
I say Cashmere Mafia FTW!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
""My love life is terrible. The last time I was inside a woman was when I visited the Statue of Liberty."
Cashmere...
...is an overall more watchable show for me than Sex and the City. I really couldn't stand the looks/personalities of anyone in SATC, and the storyline was bo-ring!
Cashmere is sorta boring, but not nearly as much. There are some cast members I don't really like to look at, but at least it's not painful to do so. I like a couple of the characters, and it might be possible for me to eventually like the others. The lesbian storyline is being done exceptionally well for a TV program.
In summary, I hated SATC, but almost sorta like Cashmere Mafia.
_____________________
Obsessive? Me? Never!
Everyone Knows?
"This is what forum moderators do - we are here to be "protectors" of sorts and make sure that everyone is able to voice their own opinions."
Actually from an academic perspective the word: "Opinion" means that a person doesn't know the subject they are talking about. So do I travel back in time and tell my professor that he probably hurt someone's feelings? Come On Now! Seems less like a "protector and more like a babysitter if you ask me.
"without fear of being chastised. We all know by now (from this thread and others) that you love Cashmere Mafia. But you're extremely defensive towards anyone who has a different opinion and, perhaps, maybe doesn't like the show as much as you do."
No I am proactive. See I am a writer if there is something wrong with the shows writing "SPELL It Out" State what it is, then write the networks and TELL them. A person CAN make an impact, I have and I'm just one person yet I sent a message to a late nite talk show and an episode that had aired serveral times that I found offensive was edited and reaired a 3rd time two days after the host received my email.
I don't care if if another person dislikes the show. Many excellent shows have been cancelled because moronic Americans badmouth them. I guess I am a member of what the President conned people into believing existed: The Intellectual Elite and proud of it!
What I am saying is that I want to see substance. I once received a message from a member who did not like a comment I made. So I articulately stated my rationale for why I posted that specific comment, and do you know what she wrote next because she didn't know how to respond? She wrote: "You're funny." I gave a sociological basis for making the statemnent she found offensive and all she could respond was: "You're funny" Nothing else. WTF?!"
In conclusion so what if everyone knows I love the show? Thank the goddess for a break from TLW I am so over that show but it doesn't mean that just because everyone knows how much I like the show that I am not going to post about it anymore.
Quote:I am so over that
Nobody asked you to stop posting about the show. We asked you to allow others to do the same and voice their moronic, uneducated, non-elite opinions too - which they are entitled to have - without being the subject of personal attacks. I'm sorry this message was too opaque; next time we'll try to be clearer.
Now, let's get back to the topic: Cashmere Mafia vs. Sex and the City!
True happiness, we are told, consists in getting out of one's self, but the point is not only to get out, you must stay out; and to stay out you must have some absorbing errand. -Henry James
It's hard to pick....
I Don't Think They're That Similar . . .
In my opinion the only real similarities these two shows share is the setting (but a lot of shows are set in New York) and the fact that it's about 4 women. The tones of the two shows are completely different and I actually think I will like Cashmere Mafia more.
I found SATC very formulaic, especially at the beginning. Every episode was about the same thing (each character searches for Mr Right). I know Samantha was an exeption but any feminist ground she might have gained was counteracted by Charlotte's character. I always heard that Charlotte wasn't in the articles/books but that the suits asked the producers to put her in as the moral centre.
I also think there was too much emphasis on fashion in SATC. The women in Cashmere do wear nice clothes but they don't ra-rah about clothes all the time in the same superficial and frivolous way as Carrie Bradshaw.
P.S. I can't stand Sarah Jessica Parker. Can you tell?
S&TC wins, IMHO
I don't think they are that similar as well... Aside from the fact that is about 4 women living in NY, wearing expensive clothes.
For me, Cashmere Mafia isn't really working. I can't feel the chemistry between the main characters, oppose to S&TC, which is one of my favorite shows ever.
I'm gonna give it another try to CM but if things stay the way they are I think I'll be just reading the reviews and recaps, just like South opf Nowhere (it's funnier, and faster). :p
Ladies, ladies, give it a chance
Rarely do the networks rerun the first episodes of Sex, but if you recall, they weren't as entertaining as the later seasons. It took a few episodes for the writers to develop the characters and for the girls to really find that timing that cracked us up so much. Point being, I say give it some time to gel before comparing this new baby series to the veteran show. Personally, I find CM loses my attention often...until I hear Lucy Liu's voice then I'm back. :)
The only difference...
The only difference between the two shows is that the women on SATC are dumb and those on CM are smart? :D *duck & run*