News, Reviews & Commentary on Lesbian and Bisexual women in Entertainment and the Media

Why is Immigration Red Hot and the Iraq War Ice Cold?

On Immigration Reform we saw the Bush-Kennedy-McCain bill die a painful death after an emotional and heated storm of protest. The bill went down in flames garnering only 46 of the needed 60 votes for cloture, and taking John McCain's presidential hopes down with it. You can stick a fork in the man, he's done. The polls showed an average of 70% of the American people were aginst this bill, some for opposing reasons. Percentages against ranged in the 80s for Republicans, the 70s for Independents and in the 60s for Democrats. State and federal senate phone lines were jammed for a week with calls running 90% against the bill. On the day it went down the senate phone system shut completely down, unable to handle the sheer volume of calls.

A similar percentage of the American people are now against the Iraq war, 72%. They want it ended and our troops to come home - yesterday. Yet when the House voted to do just that there were no jammed phone lines and only four Republicans crossed the aisle. Where is the emotion? Where is the pressure on the powers that be?

Surely it can't be that the war is fought "over there" and the affects of uncontrolled immigration is seen "over here" in our streets and communities, can it? This has me stumped. How can stopping an unpopular war be less important than the debate over amnesty verses border security? Why is the response to one so overwhelming and the other so tepid when similar numbers are against both? Any ideas?


shygurl99's picture

?????

People rather focued on things that are less important than the fact that many Iraqi people and U.S. soliders are dying everyday.I'm not saying illegal immigrants isn't a important subject but it should be someting to be debated about once we get the Iraq disaster under some control.I guess it also has to do with the media easily distracting people from the real issues.

 "Life is either a daring adventure or nothing."-Helen Keller

monkeywrench's picture

Hmm

The Iraq War has been in the headlines for years now and people tend to pay less attention to things they see every day, I find.

Also, the Iraq war is more of a partisan issue since most Republicans running for office, and certainly the ones still in office, are in favour of the war and Democrats are against it while the immigration issue tends not to be a partisan one.

__________________

"The world will not greet you with open arms, but with a clenched fist."

cylonangel's picture

Hmm back at ya...

First, good to see you again, Monkeywrench. I do enjoy your posts, especially in the great global warming causation debates!

"The Iraq War has been in the headlines for years now and people tend to pay less attention to things they see every day, I find."

I agree with your observation on point, but immigration is something we see every day as well as the non-ending IED attacks on our soldiers and the devastating car bombs against the local population of Iraq. Both are seen daily and have been for some time now so I don't see this as the issue that seperates them and explains the imbalance in the reaction.

"Also, the Iraq war is more of a partisan issue since most Republicans running for office, and certainly the ones still in office, are in favour of the war and Democrats are against it while the immigration issue tends not to be a partisan one. "

Ooh, I'm not sure about this. Every single Democrat candidate voted FOR cloture on this bill, none of the leading Republicans came out for it except for McCain who is currently hiding somewhere in the Burmuda triangle hoping this all blows over. If you exclude the politicains and deal strictly with voters, I would agree somewhat. Everyone is pissed about the current immigration situation for one reason or another, and half are really pissed about the war, with the other half resigned. That does seem to account for some of the lack of steam, but all of it?

Molly Bolt's picture

President Bush continues to

President Bush continues to reject the advice of anyone pushing him to come up with a timeline for withdrawal. As long as he's dancing around the issue, claiming to see some positives in this fiasco, I think the American public will feel that the pressure they attempt to put on Congress will be an exercise in futility. Sadly.  
cylonangel's picture

But he can be forced to..

..if enough pressure were placed to force enough Republicans across the aisle. Just enough to sustain a veto and his hands are tied. You'd think after seeing the power they can wield as they did on immigration, the people would at least muster up the effort to try. I saw no sign of that.

Why?

maggieyeahis's picture

This is why we need a draft

b/c if there was a draft and the people in the house had their kids going to war, then more of them would start putting forth more effort to stop the war. The only reason immigration is a big deal is b/c it involves a bunch of Mexicans populating the US. And then when that whole national anthem in spanish thing happen it only made matters worse. After that more people started to care about immigration. If we spend billions on Iraw to rebuild what we blew up to begin with, then i'm sure we could just build a wall on the border solve that problem and move on.
Harpy's picture

...

If a draft and Congress had anything to do with each other then we wouldn't have had one during Vietnam. This argument is irrational.

If you believe immigration is only a big deal because there's a 'bunch of Mexicans populating the US' then you clearly do not understand the issue.

Build a wall in Iraq? Like Berlin?

gali's picture

And a wall to keep out the

And a wall to keep out the Canadians too ( you can give special visas to the L word crew!) and if you then add a roof you will also be safe from hurricanes and the likes!

 

 

"call me old fashioned but I prefer feminism that leaves a little something to the imagination!"

cylonangel's picture

This is simply brilliant satire...

...and as such it stands on its own. I'm only commenting on it because I laughed so hard when I read it.

Props to you, gali. 

gali's picture

Thanks C.! "call me old

Thanks C.!

 

"call me old fashioned but I prefer feminism that leaves a little something to the imagination!"

cylonangel's picture

You earned it, Girl...

...take a bow.
lifesucksinagoodway's picture

What gives the moneymaking news media the most bang for their $

Think of the news media selling their "product". Which is cheaper to cover and will connect with more people? Iraq or immigration. How many people are directly affected by each and how long can you milk the story? Americans don't see propaganda as coming form other sources than the government. But in a Capitalist society, where profit is made from even the most basic things, information services has marketing strategies, too. CNN markets to one demographic, Fox to another, etc. Immigration will continue to get more coverage just as gay rights do, because it is an ongoing moneymaker that stirs alot of emotions in more people from different angles. Sad when you see how America has evolved.

"a little song, a little dance, a little seltzer down your pants." Chuckles the Clown

newbie's picture

Immigration Reform is a

Immigration Reform is a diversionary tactic the current administration pretends to care about.  Their useless rhetoric is used to divert the American public’s attention away from the real crises.  Iraq.  It is the identical lackluster argument as Social Security Reform.  No progress, no solutions. And the journalist's get sucked in.  It just takes up space on the front pages of the newspapers and bumps the stats for the current death count from the war, to page three. 

 

Of course that's just my opinion......

Harpy's picture

Respectfully disagree

I disagree. I think it was the marriage amendment which was used to draw attention away from Iraq and Healthcare reform. Though, the administration should have focused on illegal immigration in the first place in the "war on terror".
___      
Putting links in my signature because no one looks in my YouTube thread!
cylonangel's picture

Okay, but what about the people?

The central question here has nothing to do with the Administration and it's wishes. It is about the response of the people. Stay on topic.
lifesucksinagoodway's picture

Thanks for bringing all this up, cylonangel.

I demonstrated in DC against the first Iraq invasion and it was then that I really started seeing how the media moved "the story" of Iraq along. The politicians, anti/pro invassion people got tons of air time and it was like a mini-series played out on tv. Characters were developed, sub-plots and even more than once CNN took shots of a Wal-mart truck in the background of a site interview. It was creepy to really see it so blatantly laid out. And so when I watch and read the American news now I see the subliminial tactics so clearly. I even had a NY newspaper reporter tell me once that her paper didn't want the war to end because it had gotten to be so easy to cover. "You could write this crap in your sleep and the editors love it." The masses can be manipulated and coverage of any issue is driven by that power. When the masses get bored with an issue and viewership goes down then the media moves on. The Iraq "story" is played out and has been for over a year now. Now the media is shifting gears and that was a signal to the politicians to shift gears. I don't think it had anything to do with anything other than the fact that the news watchers were getting tired of the same old same old. I guess I'm more than a little cynical about it all by now.  Dead troops and dead civilians in Iraq, money blown over there instead of helping Katrina survivors, elder care and so many other important money needs here. And then the struggle of illegal immigrants and their desperation for coming here in the first place. When election season starts their stories will be explioted and the masses will be stirred to "respond to camera 2, please" But another part of me hopes more people see through the mini-series set up and think for themselves with real facts and compassion. I'm gonna cross my finger and hope for that, 'cause I'm so sick of the suffering of so many so a handful can thrive.

 "a little song, a little dance, a little seltzer down your pants." Chuckles the Clown

cylonangel's picture

Very, very...

...well done. You nailed your position and that has gotten me thinking. I gotta stew on this for a bit and may come back to it.

Thanks either way. The media coverage has definitely played a strong role in the reaction (lack there of?) of the people and you have explained a facet of it hat I had not paid enough attention to. Thanks for posting, justlife.

newbie's picture

It's about the people.

Sorry I wasn't clear with my comment. I believe I was on topic.  People talk and react to the things they read and hear about most in the news.  Illegal immigration is a “homeland” subject; therefore it takes front stage with most people because it affects them on a personal level. In their backyard.  And they read about it every day in the papers to help add fuel to the fire.
cylonangel's picture

I gotcha...

People talk and react to the things they read and hear about most in the news.

Do you not see news, dreadful news (IED attacks and horrific car bombs against civilians) every day? I know I do.

Illegal immigration is a “homeland” subject; therefore it takes front stage with most people because it affects them on a personal level. In their backyard.  And they read about it every day in the papers to help add fuel to the fire.

So it is really an "over here verses over there" thing, in your opinion? Man, that's depressing if true. And I/m beginning to believe it is.

Harpy's picture

...

It's not an "us vs them" thing - It's a question of what affects us in our day to day lives. We may read or hear about the atrocities in Iraq, but we are separated from them by oceans.
newbie's picture

Hey Harpy and Cylonangel! 

Hey Harpy and Cylonangel!  I just threw in an observation out of boredom, not out of full knowledge of the subject. My bad. I’m going to gracefully bow out of this discussion (or stumble out I should say).  I’ve read too many of your very impressive posts regarding politics to even think I could stay afloat. But I tell you guys, I thoroughly enjoy reading your comments and arguments!  You smarty pants you!!   

Newbie

Harpy's picture

So sad

Hey!  There's no bowing out!  I enjoy your posts! 
       
Don't make me sad.  I don't want to be sad.  :(
         
___      
Putting links in my signature because no one looks in my YouTube thread!
Harpy's picture

My opinion

Instead of this nonsense in Iraq we should have focused on illegal immigration in the first place, in my opinion.  The notion (what we were lead to believe) behind invading Iraq was to prevent terrorism -- It seems most logical that this process should start at home by protecting our borders. 
            
As for the question at hand in this subject, I would not say the Iraq War is a cold issue and immigration a hot one.  Illegal immigration is something we can take preventative measures against and see some results.  The situation in Iraq, at present, holds no viable political solution with a Lame Duck President/Congress. 
George Washington would be turning over in his grave if he knew of the situation the US is in now -- The very thing he warned of over 200 years ago in his farewell address.
       
George Washington wrote:
It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.
          
We're a country who is united only after a national tragedy, otherwise all bets are off.  That is very sad.
         
To speak a little on illegal immigration... It is a problem in the US.  Building a fence alone isn't going to resolve much and that does nothing about the illegal immigrants in the country now -- Nor the corporations who hire them and only receive a slap on the wrist when caught.  We need to enact extremely stiff penalties to corporations who hire illegals; and we need to deport illegal immigrants found guilty of a crime immediately and not throw them in jail while waiting on their deportation hearings and appeals. 
             
That is a prime example of where we fail.  One side would choose to direct their attention on those who hire; and the other focuses on those who are the employed.  Neither side is right nor wrong, their focus is solely dependant upon their political associations.
         
__      
Putting links in my signature because no one looks in my YouTube thread!
cylonangel's picture

I disagree on only one point..

...and that means I'm damn near in love. ;)

...and we need to deport illegal immigrants found guilty of a crime immediately and not throw them in jail while waiting on their deportation hearings and appeals. 

If you deport them immediatley, they pay no penalty and come back across. The idea of jailing them for a bit is to exact a penalty. You can't earn money while you're in jail.

espejitoespejito's picture

Just a note.

Just a note (probably a really long one, more like an essay sans coherent structure and style)from the other side of the wall, no intention of starting a big argument and going off topic, although comments are appreciated of course :).

Disclosure: 1. I believe all crimes should be punished(fairly), including illegal entry into any country. 2. I do not believe immigration should be considered a more important or pressing issue at this time than the Iraq war. 3. I am Mexican-American and damn proud of it.

Idea A:Deportation is never immediate; on both sides of the border immigrants are held under terrible conditions and separated from their families and lives for insane amounts of time . Migrating is a sacrifice you make with the intention of giving those you love a better life, if you don't believe this find out about the first immigrants, and I mean the cold historical truth, not the happy little pilgrims version, your own ancestors. Migrating will cost you your livelihood, your culture, your family, and very often your life. People do not jump across the border like someone jumps over a fence. Forget the wall, there are miles and miles of hostile desert , trigger happy immigration agents, narcs, snakes, you name it .

Idea 2:Immigration worldwide, as it is most definitely not exclusive to the US, is a phenomenon that must be dealt with 1. By the country from which migrants are parting 2. In accordance with the country where they are going. International cooperation is necessary, this is not a random or ill-intentioned social phenomenon, we are all to blame, that "bunch of Mexicans" is not out to steal your jobs and join gangs... Globalized capitalism functions only if a handful of nations enjoy the benefits and the rest, suffer the consequences. A wall will not change anything. Employment opportunities, better living conditions, etc. in the countries of origin are the only possible solutions. Those must be achieved by local governments but with the support of international agencies, and ethical business. Those same corporations hiring beaners in the US for less then minimum wage, are bringing it back home, hiring the same beaners for even less in mexico.But the men in the background the ones making the money are not Mex., they are born and bred white Americans. So are the billions of American and European drug abusers, that keep Mexico under the thumb of the drug cartels. If a tunnel is made under the wall, the digging will be done by Mexicans, the dangerous illegal crossing will be done by Mexicans, the drugs will be consumed by Americans and the profits will go to, guess who?

The funny thing is, all this crime we Mexicans cause in the US, the gratuitous violence and gangs, it's not a symptom of Mexican ideosinchrasy,it is not part of Mexican reality, rather it is a problem common to all minorities in the US, so don't you think it might be time to stop thinking of us as others, consider us your own and then we could all take the time to wonder what the hell went wrong?

It's just a thought, probably bit off-topic but I am so terribly aware of my immigrant reality, without having wetback stapled to my forehead, I am Mexican-American, now an immigrant in Spain (although in that case the term is ex-patriate,right?). And although I tend to be a whole lot more conservative then I wish to admit when it comes to immigration issues, I do think we have to stop thinking in this abstract and tainted by propaganda way that makes us believe a wall, and sending the "bunch of Mexicans" back where they belong, is going to solve everything. Reality is much more complicated, and as my mom taught me, preparing me for the dissapiontment that life is, "follow the money".

Question 1: How does fighting illegal immigration from MEXICO, constitute fighting a "War on Terror"?

As Porfirio Diaz once said, "Mexico: so far from God, and so close to the United States."

Ps, oops.

http://iwoulddosupermanifhewouldletme.blogspot.com project/art blog (english)
http://comadotcom.blogspot.com

 

Harpy's picture

Thoughts

Looking back over my last post, I realize I made a grievous, completely unintentional error.   I wrote that "immigration is a problem in the US" rather than stating *illegal immigration* is a problem.  Editing my original post to reflect that correctly.

espejitoespejito wrote:
Question 1: How does fighting illegal immigration from MEXICO, constitute fighting a "War on Terror"?

Securing our borders should be the most important aspect of the War on Terror.  The fact that we cannot prevent millions of illegal immigrants crossing our southern border, one would think, would be a red flag to our current administration.  It's not that preventing Mexicans from crossing would prevent terrorism, but rather our inability to do so exemplifies a weakness in our national security.  Illegal immigration is an entirely separate problem in the US.
             
Also, President Bush dissolved the US Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) and incorporated it into the Homeland Security Administration.  Thereby, atleast in name, placed border security as an integral part of national security.  Of course, the administration has done nothing in this regard.
              
espejitoespejito wrote:
Migrating is a sacrifice you make with the intention of giving those you love a better life, if you don't believe this find out about the first immigrants, and I mean the cold historical truth, not the happy little pilgrims version, your own ancestors.
              
Indeed.  A vast majority of the first North American immigrants were Indentured Servants.  As most lacked the funds required, this is how their passage was paid for.  20 years servitude.  I can only begin to imagine the brutality and pain most suffered after signing this contract.
        
espejitoespejito wrote:
And although I tend to be a whole lot more conservative then I wish to admit when it comes to immigration issues, I do think we have to stop thinking in this abstract and tainted by propaganda way that makes us believe a wall, and sending the "bunch of Mexicans" back where they belong, is going to solve everything.
            
Well, I wouldn't have worded it in such a way -- And I do feel placing a wall is a good portion propaganda, but it also can make a difference.  Ultimately, however, the blame lies on Mexico and the blind eye their government turns when it comes to their citizens crossing the border to the US.  Not to mention the fact that the majority of the country lives in poverty, or extreme poverty, is a telltale sign the Mexican government fails. 
           
I read an interesting statistic the other day - Over $20 billion dollars is sent annually by illegal Mexican immigrants to Mexico to help support their families (It was in a world knowledge quiz someone posted here on AE).  All the while Mexico also has one of the highest percentages of millionaires in the world.  The problem I have is that Mexico allows the US to help their economy instead of the Mexican government helping their own people.
           
Let me tack one other thing on to this discussion that I have a problem with.  The notion that if you criticize illegal immigration, you are criticizing immigration itself.  I am from a family of immigrants and also a family of indigenous people.  My grandmother on my father's side, immigrated from Poland just before World War II; my great-grandmother on my mother's side was Cherokee Indian.  Beyond that, my mother's side has been in the country for generations. 
            
My family has faced racism from both sides and also been a part of it; having been slave owners before the Civil War and having ancestors seen as an just a "inferior Indian".  I do not see the current issue of illegal immigration as an issue of racism, I see it as a legal issue.  If you are Hispanic, Russian, Chinese; and you went through the legal procedures to grant citizenship, then you have the right to the "American dream".  If you entered this country illegally, then you have broken the law and you have absolutely no right to be here.
___      
Putting links in my signature because no one looks in my YouTube thread!

User login

Recent comments

After Ellen home page on logo online