Welcome to AfterEllen.com!

Enter your AfterEllen.com username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
News, Reviews & Commentary on Lesbian and Bisexual women in Entertainment and the Media

Rebound Reviews: "Being John Malkovich"

Craig is left quite literally in the dust, and later becomes (through his own wrongdoing) permanently disembodied — as powerless as can be and unable to ruin Maxine and Lotte's domestic bliss. It's potentially one of the happiest lesbian couplings in recent history, and it only took two hours of body transmogrification to get there.

One of the most interesting elements of the film is the whimsical and even playful attitude towards gender. To be more precise, the emphasis here is less on gender and more on the desire to be someone — anyone — else.

At one point in the film, Craig describes puppetry in similar terms, saying, "The desire to be in someone else's skin is overwhelming." It doesn't seem to truly matter that Malkovich is male, though that initially plays a part in Maxine and Lotte's relationship. He is merely the physical representation of being someone new, seeing the world through new eyes.

The same can be said of using others, which is the other main theme of the film: manipulation. It's no coincidence that Craig is a master puppeteer, eventually gaining control of Malkovich's body and living in it as if it were his own.

Maxine is guilty of the same crime, as she leaves Lotte for a time in order to use Malkovich/Craig to rise to fame. Everyone who "uses" Malkovich runs the risk of being disembodied (which happens to the power-hungry Craig), of literally losing him or herself. So while the urge to experience the world through new eyes is enticing, it's not the way to go.

The characters and the strange journeys they embark upon truly make the movie. Maxine begins the film as a sexy, manipulative conniver, forever confidant and used to getting what she wants. Throughout the course of the film, she is open to new experiences, falls in love, ignores that love, suffers and then finds love again.

Lotte starts off as a goofy, aloof animal lover, begins to think she's better off in a male body, falls in love, forgets about the body thing and ends up being happy.

Craig fares worse. He begins the film as a misunderstood artist, he connives and manipulates, and eventually he ends up powerless and trapped.

At its heart, in fact, the movie is a love story and parable about finding oneself. Craig is punished at the end because he can't be satisfied being himself, and he manipulates people to get what he wants.

Both Lotte and Maxine suffer throughout the film — Lotte because she feels like she needs to be in Malkovich to be happy, and Maxine because she won't admit that she loves Lotte (not Malkovich) until the end. Throughout all the insanity and complications, Lotte and Maxine find each other, lose each other and reconnect in a twist on the classic "girl meets girl; girl loses girl; girl wins girl back" romantic comedy paradigm.

Being John Malkovich is not a film for the faint-of-brain, nor for those who can't appreciate its incredibly quirky worldview or sense of humor. But the film has some interesting things to say about the nature of gender and sexuality, and it never sensationalizes or belittles said notions. Plus, it is monstrously funny — at least for those who enjoy the offbeat.

But perhaps most importantly, it features a strange but happy little lesbian love story at its heart, proving that not every mainstream lesbian relationship has to be sensationalized or oversimplified to be effective in a film.

Trix's picture

Interesting take. I have to

Interesting take.

I have to say I didn't think of it as a lesbian love story at the time, since it was all interpreted through the means of John Malkovich's body. It seemed about as lesbian to me as the Whoopie/Demi scene in Ghost, but in reverse. But I probably wasn't paying that much attention - I don't remember the ending at all - because its brand of surrealism wasn't really one that worked for me. I seem to have an aversion to puppets as a trope - I liked The Truman Show and Eternal Sunshine. Perhaps also because I didn't find any of the characters particularly appealing - while John Malkovich is a good actor, this just went a bit beyond the self-referential comfort zone for me.

Still, I'll have to watch it again and see if I actually register the lesbian text next time around!

Girly's picture

So I'm not the only one

The first thing that came to mind when I saw the article was 'There was something/someone gay in the movie?'. But then I forgot that there was a lesbian (more of forget that the character was a lesbian) in "L'Auberge Espagnole" too. I had a habit of forgetting, or unconsciously ignoring female gay characters back when I thought I was straight.

Anyway, great article. It made me want to watch the movie again.

kathy's picture

Hmm..

I rented this movie when it came out way back when...at that time I was living as a straight woman with my hubby...we didn't understand the film at all. After reading this review and now living as a lesbian in a happy relationship...I will have to watch 'Being John Malcovich' again..I think now that my eyes are wide open it will make better sense to me.
zee's picture

hell yeah

This movie confirmed my love for all things Catherine Keener.   I was impressed with her in “Living in Oblivion” (1995) with Steve Buscemi, but “Being John Malkovich” elevated her to near-worship status.  What a smart, clever, original film.  It even made me like Cameron Diaz.   And John Cusack is always a perennial favorite (his sister ain’t half bad either – funny, funny woman).
water-fly's picture

Always Kaufman

Kaufman is a genious and this movie is prove of it. This film is one of the strangest but at the same time best explorations of the human psyche i've seen. And i agree with you outToLunch, it even made me like cameron diaz too, something that has never happend again since this movie though :-)
mPod's picture

i love it.

I'm right with you on this one. This film's been at the top of my list since I saw it in theatres... twice. I think the surrealist form this movie takes provides an incredibly effective examination of human nature. It doesn't have to be a literal discussion on the topic--like in Waking Life, for example--because its subtlety allows for a more natural examination. I just love Kaufman's exposition into the different facets of human identity--it's all incredibly psychological, which is probably why I love it :) Kaufman is a genius.

fee's picture

Being John Malkovich

I really enjoyed this movie. And it made me a Catherine Keener obsessive for a while (and I still think she's amazing :) ).
I like complicated movies. I like it even more when it deals with interesting stuff (i.e. gender, identity etc.). Nice review!
Muriel's picture

:)

I loved this movie from the first 5 minutes or so onward--and that infatuation started even before the lesbian subplot emerged. Once that happened I was won over completely.
Gigi's picture

good stuff

this is one of my favorite movies. it's weird and wonderful. and the relationship betwn Lottie and Maxine is complex in what's ultimately a very sweet way. i hadn't thought of it so much in terms of gender and being comfortable in one's own skin but i can see all that now on a different level after reading the review. great choice for an article!

allgood2's picture

A Great Movie

I was reading the comments of some post the other day, and I believe Sarah mention something about not ever wanting to see "Being John Malkovich" and I was just shocked and surprise; because it truly is one quirky, funny, intelligent, but entertaining movie about self-realization. And yeah, Cameron Diaz falling for Catherine Keener was both gravy and butter.

Someone could do a 100 page thesis on the gender identity issues covered in this film, and still Maxine telling Lottie, '..and you, you're adorable, but I just want you when you're in John Malkovich' is still hilarious, tender, and heartbreaking for me. I think the Lottie giggle helped ease the transition of what really could have been a devasting pronouncement to make it something more hopeful.  O' and John Cusacks face when he realizes his  'mousy' wife is getting the girl he wants.

Plus John Malkovich as the most boring John Malkovich ever. He's ordering towels from catalogs, eating take-out, and doing all types of day to day activities. Most of them so trival, you don't even want to do them in your own life, but people are lining up for it. 

All the gender and self issues are great and wonderfully handled, but I must admit whenever I look at the video cover, I always think of Cameron's lusty giggle when she realizes thatJohn's seeing Maxine; and she wants to be John more and more frequently.
eyethinkforme's picture

Quirky , And That's An Understatement...Love It!

I've loved this strange film since it was first released. I own it and periodically re-view it and each time I find something new that I never saw before.

I would put it in a unique category of films along with "Mulholland Drive" and "2001: A Space Odyssey". Like those movies, at the very most, you can only come tantalizing close to thinking you have it figured out, but you never really can because it's meant to be an enigma, an eternal and mystifying puzzle. I love the mental stimulation that I get from being exposed to that kind of upside down, inside out way of looking at things.

What is funny to me about the film is that Cameron Diaz plays a somewhat withdrawn and frumpy character (if you can even imagine her as anything but drop dead gorgeous) to Catherine Keeler's sexy and smart woman of the world.

 Highly recommended viewing!