Review of "2 Minutes Later"The film gives absolute parity to the lesbian and gay male characters, and that includes the sex scenes. In fact, Gaston flips the usual stereotypes on their heads by making Michael's sex scene with Joey romantic and tender, while Abigail has a handful of casual encounters with women. Abigail drags "America's pop sensation Monique" (Jennifer Layne Park), who shows up wasted at a photo shoot, into Kyle's bathroom for a long, deep kiss, prompting the Britney-esque Monique to announce to the press that she's now a lesbian. Later in the course of the investigation, Abigail and another one of Kyle's models, May (Mei-Yann Hwang), disappear into an art gallery rest room for an up-against-the-wall encounter disrupted only when Michael needs her help to get away from a gun-wielding murderer.
Both the blossoming friendship between Michael and Abigail, with its hints of personal redemption for them both, and the gentle rapport between Michael and Joey give a taste of sweetness to a film that could have been very dark. There is, after all, a murder to be solved (the murder takes place before the opening credits, so that's not as much of a spoiler as it might appear), and a murderer, played by out gay actor Peter Stickles (Shortbus, The Lair) to be caught. Suspense, great characters, terrific acting, a tight story and a lot of really pretty people exchanging clever dialogue — what's not to love? Well, a few things. The opening credits are endless, and several of the scenes run long, as though the filmmaker was too much in love with his shot to know when to cut it. And while overall the film is stylish and professional-looking, the low budget did leave its mark. Still, none of those things makes much of a dent in the sheer enjoyment value of 2 Minutes Later.
The film ends with "The End?" — which immediately begs the question of whether there's going to be a sequel. Gaston said, "It would be cool to work with Michael and Jessica again — and we just started to scratch the surface with where there characters could go." Since the film feels a little like a set-up for things to come — almost like the pilot for a perfect lesbian detective/gay man sidekick TV crime drama — it would be nice to see just what Abigail and Michael do next. Find out more about 2 Minutes Later, including screening dates, at the film's official website. |
Recent blog posts
New forum topicsActive TopicsNew Comments
|


What inspired director Robert Gaston to make the first lesbian/gay man detective buddy movie? "Attending GLBT film festivals with my last film, OpenCam, I kept seeing the GLBT community divided as men and women went to their separate theaters for separate experiences," he said. "It's been a goal of mine in recent projects to try to appeal and celebrate the sexuality of a cross-section of the community. I developed the characters of Abigail and Michael because I wanted to show gay men and lesbians working together, and depict a relationship I'd not see on film before." 
sounds
sounds really good, i probably wont ever get to see it though tbf :(
www.myspace.com/jo_16_
Maybe on DVD
This is the kind of movie
The acting holds up
I don't know...
reading the description of this movie all I could think of was I would probably want to see this movie if it weren't for the love scenes between the gay men. Maybe it's just me, but I don't even like love scenes between a woman and a man, so two men together is when I'd have to get up and pee. If I was caught by surprise I might not even wait to get up out of my seat....
Lady Feminist (sometimes a lady, always a feminist)
Interesting...
I don't enjoy seeing sex scenes with mixed-gender couples in films or on TV, but I have no problem watching two men, assuming I like the characters. I don't like actual gay male porn, but in a dramatic or romantic context, when the characters are appealing in some way, I find love scenes between men appealing. For instance, I loved Johnny and Omar in My Beautiful Laundrette and Jamie and Ste in Beautiful Thing, loved Brian and Justin in QAF and Noah and Wade in Noah's Arc. But many other male/male sex scenes in movies and on TV have left me cold. But I can say the same thing about any couple in TV or movies, really, including two women who I don't find appealing together. I guess what I'm saying is that I take it as it comes, and don't lump them all together.
In this film I neither particularly liked or didn't like the men's sex scene (there's only one). But it was absolutely critical to the plot and characterization of Michael.
Gack!
My Beautiful Laundrette was the first, and last, movie I ever saw with two men making whoppie with each other. Almost 25 years later I still remember the nasiating feeling I had while watching it and it wasn't even graphic sex. I even hated Ghost with Dimi Moore because she looked like a boy and the pottery scene with whats-his-name looked like boy on boy action. Ick! There's a reason the lesbians go into one theatre and the gay men into another. I say let's leave well enough alone.
Lady Feminist (sometimes a lady, always a feminist)
You should only do what you want to do...
I would never expect or ask anyone to see a film they don't want to see. I hate, for example, all horror films and all sad movies. I wouldn't like it if you tried to get me to see one, and so I'd never try to get you to see a film that contained a male/male love scene.
However, when you say:
you're going way beyond saying what YOU like. You're extending this into a lesbian thing, a principle, something all lesbians share.
Many lesbians like or don't mind male/male love or sex scenes. Some lesbians are actually particularly into them. I count myself in the first group, but I know lots of lesbians in the second group.
So please, continue to speak for yourself and I'll defend your right to see what you want, like what you want. But don't try to imply that what you want is what all lesbians want, or what you don't like is what all lesbians don't like, or that we "should" or "shouldn't" like certain things in films. It's nothing more than a personal preference on your part, and has nothing to do what other lesbians do or don't like in a movie or TV show.
I concur with Christie's
I concur with Christie's comment here.
Your response is intelligent and logical. I will defends anyones right to see what they want. However, I will not be lumped into any generalized category because I am a lesbian.
I dislike it immensely when someone points out to me that because I am a lesbian I hate men, gay men especially. This is a horrible stereotype. I have many male friends, I even enjoy watching movies with them, because we can appreciate the same things.
I will admit that I like love scenes, when they are done with a purpose, hetro, m/m, w/w. I am a fan of m/m and w/w love scenes especially.
If its not your cup of tea, that's fine. I appreciate that, but do not perpetuate stereotypical thinking with lumping every lesbian into the same mold. We are a diverse, beautiful and open segment of society.
Well, maybe it's my age group
When that gay cowboy movie came out not a single lesbian I know cared to see it. They all felt as I do and it has nothing to do with hating men. Just as my being a lesbian has nothing to do with hating men, I don't have to hate men in order not to want to see them having sex with each other.
Lady Feminist (sometimes a lady, always a feminist)
Its unfortunate that you and
Its unfortunate that you and your circle of friends have denied yourself seeing a movie because it has m/m sex in it. I went to see this movie with a female to male transgendered friend of mine. I knew that there was a m/m sex scene. However, out of over 2 hours of movie there is approximately 10 minutes of m/m action. It is a beautiful story. Brokeback Mountain was a wonderful tale of a relationship that anyone, in my not so humble opinion, can relate to if they are willing to be open to it.
Humans are not created from a cookie cutter. LGBT are decidedly a wonderful mix of fabulous diversity. We should embrace our diversity. We should celebrate it and not allow ourselves or anyone to try to lump us together and stamp us out in a particular shape, size, or style.
I am a lesbian and I celebrate our diversity every single day. I take pride in pointing out the stereotypes and that I and others do not fit into the mold of someones else's preconceived notion of what the label of lesbian or gay is.
My point is, I think I have made it, but let me be clear, that generalizations are just that. You will always find, and I believe you have found, people who will never fit into the neat label that so many people want to place upon us.
Nevertheless I think we are coming to an impass and should agree to disagree. I sense that I shall not change your opinion and I can assure you, that you will not change mine.
I don't think it's your age group....
When that gay cowboy movie came out not a single lesbian I know cared to see it.
I saw it with another lesbian, and I don't know one dyke who DIDN'T see it. And I'm 48, saw it with a dyke who is, I believe, in her mid-40s, and a good friend of mine who wanted to see it with me but didn't is in her late 60s -- she did see it, twice. Loved it. She liked it a lot more than I did.
Also, the point is not, for me, what you do and don't like to see. That's your personal thing and none of my business.
It was how you said that there is a reason lesbians and gay men segregate in the movie theater and we should "leave well enough alone." THAT is what I was objecting to, not your personal taste but your implication that your personal taste should extend beyond YOU.
Please do not speak for us all.
There is a reason why lesbians tend to go into one theatre and gay men into another, but at least for this lesbian, it isn't because i don't want to see "boy on boy action." In fact, on occasion, I have been known to enjoy seeing romantic and sexual relationships between men unfold on the screen or in writing. Rather, if i tend to go into one theatre over another, it is because I want to see films featuring lesbian characters, and in the past, that has meant films primarily featuring only lesbian characaters.
I applaud the writer of "2 minutes Later" for choosing to feature both a lesbian and gay man as the two leads in a film, and presenting them both as fully sexualized human beings.
I respect your right not to enjoy seeing two men together on screen, but would appreciate it if you would not present your feelings on the subject as representative of all lesbians.
Hopefully there will always be a creative few who choose to go against the norm, and are never content to "leave well enough alone."
Wow -I wonder if this is how
The problem with this way of
The problem with this way of thinking is that it's just what straight people want to hear. Whether or not it's your particular preference, your desire to keep things separate plays right into the way the straight community views most things gay. Keep them separate, keep them away from us, and it just gets worse day by day.
I for one would love to see this film. The overall premise is appealing, and I'm not particular about who is getting any. Male, female, it's all good. Just let it be hot, and above all else, don't bore me. JMO, NOM
I take umbrage with your
I take umbrage with your broad and sweeping statement that that's why lesbians and gays part ways at the movie theater. Like Christie, I, too, enjoy man-on-man sex if the people are particularly likeable. I, like her, am a fan of QAF, also a fan of Noah's Arc, but also a fan of the L Word. I know that you're entitled to your opinion, but you seem so closed minded about people making a connection, whoever they might be.
By the way, and I'm not trying to pick a fight, but it's Demi and also whoopee.
Stay well, my dear. And remember to love all those around you. *bg*
Wow, that's a pretty tough
Hooray for Christine Keith!
Thank You Christie!
Skip it
Hotchie Matchie
I want to see this film. NOW. Tell me where it's playing.
http://afterportia.blogspot.com