Senate votes to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”


History was made today when the US Senate voted to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” by a vote of 65-31.
Jennifer Vanasco at our sibling site wrote,
“This is landmark legislation and means that gay servicemembers will be able to serve openly once the President and Department of Defense certifies to Congress that millitary efficiency will not be impeded.”

Senators Lieberman and Collins

The Associate Press reports:

In a landmark for gay rights, the Senate on Saturday voted to let
gays serve openly in the military, giving President Barack Obama the
chance to fulfill a campaign promise and repeal the 17-year policy known
as “don’t ask, don’t tell.”

Obama was expected to sign it next week, although the change wouldn’t
take immediate effect. The legislation says the president and his top
military advisers must certify that lifting the ban won’t hurt troops’
fighting ability. After that, there’s a 60-day waiting period for the

“It is time to close this chapter in our history,” Obama said in a
statement after a test vote cleared the way for final action. “It is
time to recognize that sacrifice, valor and integrity are no more
defined by sexual orientation than they are by race or gender, religion
or creed.”

The Senate vote was 65-31. The House had passed an identical version of the bill, 250-175, on Wednesday.

Repeal would mean that, for the first time in American history, gays
would be openly accepted by the military and could acknowledge their
sexual orientation without fear of being kicked out.

More than 13,500 service members have been dismissed under the 1993 law.

Rounding up a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate was a historic
victory for Obama, who made repeal a campaign promise in 2008. It also
was a political triumph for congressional Democrats who struggled in the
final hours of the postelection session to overcome GOP objections on
several legislative priorities before Republicans regain control of the
House in January.

“As Barry Goldwater said, ‘You don’t have to be straight to shoot
straight,’” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., referring to
the late GOP senator from Arizona.

Sen. John McCain, Obama’s GOP rival in 2008, led the opposition. The
Arizona Republican acknowledged he didn’t have the votes to stop the
bill and he blamed elite liberals with no military experience for
pushing their social agenda on troops during wartime.

“They will do what is asked of them,” McCain said of service members. “But don’t think there won’t be a great cost.”

In the end, six GOP senators broke with their party on the procedural
vote to let the bill move ahead and swung behind repeal after a recent
Pentagon study concluded the ban could be lifted without hurting the
ability of troops to fight.

Advocacy groups who lobbied hard for repeal hailed the vote as a
significant step forward in gay rights. The Servicemembers Legal Defense
Network called the issue the “defining civil rights initiative of this

Supporters of repeal filled the visitor seats overlooking the Senate floor, ready to protest had the bill failed.

“This has been a long fought battle, but this failed and
discriminatory law will now be history,” said Joe Solmonese, president
of the Human Rights Campaign.

The Pentagon study found that two-thirds of service members didn’t
think changing the law would have much of an effect. But of those who
did predict negative consequences, a majority were assigned to combat
arms units. Nearly 60 percent of the Marine Corps and Army combat units,
such as infantry and special operations, said in the survey they
thought repealing the law would hurt their units’ ability to fight.

The Pentagon’s uniformed chiefs are divided on whether this resistance might pose serious problems.

Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James Amos has said he thinks lifting the ban during wartime could cost lives.

“I don’t want to lose any Marines to the distraction,” he told
reporters this week. “I don’t want to have any Marines that I’m visiting
at Bethesda (Naval Medical Center) with no legs be the result of any
type of distraction.”

Adm. Mike Mullen and Marine Gen. James Cartwright, the chairman and
vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, respectively, have said the
fear of disruption is overblown. They note the Pentagon’s finding that
92 percent of troops who believe they have served with a gay person saw
no effect on their units’ morale or effectiveness. Among Marines in
combat roles who said they have served alongside a gay person, 84
percent said there was no impact.

Tell us what you think about this exciting news!


More you may like