News, Reviews & Commentary on Lesbian and Bisexual women in Entertainment and the Media

The Gay Agenda: the issue of poverty

Why isn't poverty a gay issue? Jennifer Vanasco and Jon Mallow of 365gay.com discuss what the criteria should be for the issues our organizations and media consider "gay."

Also, they talk about why we focus so hard on the issues of military and marriage.

The Gay Agenda July 25, 2008

arodrig's picture

I don't know

I'm not so sure that we should take such things as the right to marriage for granted just now. And as to "don't ask don't tell" it's  for me still confusing. I am very opposed to the current war and such. But my uncle, who is gay, served very honorably in the Korean conflict and is very proud of his service... that he had to hide a part of himself is terrible, but he would have served again...
Through_the_Rye's picture

I love your optimism,

I love your optimism, Jennifer. I hope we do get marriage recognition soon. But I disagree about the death penalty stance. I think it's become more and more necessary, as prisons are overflowing, and there are some extremely horrendous crimes committed that deserve death.
brackishtea's picture

Pro-death? Yes!

I am pro-death too! Killing murders or people who do crimes that are unspeakable, abortion if you don't want the baby; why wait 9 months to give it up, when you can save yourself the vomiting and scarring. Crude way of the position but that to me what it sums it up.

I propose the bringing back of the public executions. Since prisons are overflowing, let's not think about what percent of the prison population actually commited murders and just kill them all like th rats they are[well the ones causing the overflow]!!!!!!!!! Or that fact that maybe some of the prinsoners have some form of a mental disability that goes unnoticed; gas chambers, the leathal injections, the possibilities are endless! It has become more of a need for the fact we can't seem to make any use of them, seeing them on the side of the road picking up litter is just not cutting it, so yea kill them. It's an eye for an eye; a tooth for a tooth that we so happily take in as our mantra for justice.

I propose of putting the prisoners in little boxes so the will go crazy and the only thing comforting them is their hopless screams. Hearing the screams bouncing off the walls will be the only satisfactory punishment for crimes that sometimes were not properly investigated. The literacy programs, religious programs poppy cock, it's draining the tax dollars! We can use the money for my needs and my wants and not from some lowlife whose environment gave him/her little to do but only to commit disgusting crimes.

I for one propose that we turn a blind eye to the practices that go on in the prisons and turn it into one big death camp for those who strayed 3x (3 strikes rule) from the law or killed someone. It need more and more "as prisons are overflowing and there are some extremely horrendous crimes committed that deserve death." 

Oh ridding the vile likes of these prisoners of their humanity by killing, I mean execution, will help remove some of the burdern that we just, decent taxpayers have to pay. After the "that" issue is done, who will we target next? The homeless, poor people?

********Disclaimer*************

It's a poorly written prose of satire as a response to the poster of Through the Rye, since I found it funny(?) that death penalty is thought as a solution to overflowing prisons [well one of the solutions, either way it sounded horrible].

arodrig's picture

Absolutely!

I've always thought that the best way to hinder murder is to kill people.

But let's not just stop there, best go for the poor, the imigrants and of course the gays.

 

The death penalty is jsut indecent, why are we in America so willing to except it as a matter of course, when every other civilized nation has or is seeing it go?

lanis's picture

Wicked

LOL

You have one wicked sense of humor. That was the most over-the-top and entertaining response to the death penalty I've heard in a while, and so true.  Haven't most fascist governments tried doing just that?

OceanZen76's picture

DADT is a very important issue to me!

As a "critical skills" veteran who was kick out under DADT, and whose partner is still in the military, DADT has had a serious impact not only on my career but on my relationship with my partner of 6 years. Lifting the ban could possibly allow me to re-enlist if I so chose and allow my partner and I to be co-located when receiving orders. Repeal of DADT would allow me to attend functions as a military spouse and receive the recognition that other spouses receive for their support of the command.

The command we are at now has been surprisingly supportive and has tended to look the other way when it comes to my attending events. Probably because I am prior service. But I am still officially seen at the "best friend" and "roommate" of my partner. Then again, neither one of those tags are false. ;-)

One last thought...I can understand the pacifist mentality, and this is not to say that there aren't military members who are gung ho kill kill kill, but a vast majority of military members are out there saving lives, not taking them. At least, that was my job. I respect and applaud ANYONE who is willing to give up their time, their way of life, and possibly even their life, for the protection and service of others.

arodrig's picture

Totally agree

One may or may not agree with  the politics of the situation, but God bless the soldiers who put their life on the line for so very little in exchange...
sweatbandrugger15's picture

I'm not pro-military but...

Don't Ask, Don't Tell and the poverty issue totaly intersect. Think about all of the people who utilize the military as a way to get a job or fund higher education when they do not have any other options. Discriminating against gay people affects gays and lesbians ability to get an education in a country that increasingly demands college degrees.

On another note, once one of our country's most conservative institutions acknowledges that gay people deserve equal treatment, that will affect every other "gay issue" positively.

My Name Is Tara's picture

Issues discussed..

I like that you all had issues to talk about but I feel there were too many at once to focus on. You all only discussed about poverty for a "second" than you began giving opinions on other issues. I would have liked to have heard two issues such as poverty and something else as a discussion. (this is my first episode to view of "The Gay Agenda") The poverty issue is interesting, I like to hear more about it.
suzibandit's picture

its not the same here

in the UK its different we have civil partershps etc but the same grassroots issues apply.people are still pejudice and given the opportunity will still express prejduice if possible
judithavory's picture

Let's focus on community issues

This is the first time I've seen the Gay Agenda, and I must say I was disappointed. Yes, I think we should fight poverty and the death penalty - we as gay people.  But as organizations, as a movement, there is FAR more to think about beyond marriage and the military that directly affects gay rights.  Gay people have tons of political issues that we care about, but we all differ.  Why not put our efforts on those issues in with the organizations devoted to them, and use the limited resources of gay organizations to deal with the issues that specifically affect our community.  No one else is going to do our work for us!

Suggestions:

- Get legislation passed to allow gay partnerships as a basis for family-sponsored immigration

- Programs to help gay youth who are poor, men and women of color, or in rural areas

- Awareness and education in general

- Target violence, especially in the schools (this is a BIG problem where I come from)

- Sex education that includes information about gay and lesbian sexual practices and how we can have safe sex (especially for young lesbians, this isn't a no-brainer) and ideally gender identity awareness as well

- Get gender identity/multiplicity into education in general, including colleges and universities

- Educate the medical establishment not to assume heterosexuality and to understand the unique concerns of gays, lesbians, and transfolks

- Target employment discrimination, especially in education

- Open gay community centers so people have somewhere to go aside from the bars

- Combat homophobia in the media

 Etc etc etc...... 

My Name Is Tara's picture

Suggestions..

Thank you for posting suggestions, Judith.
lulabek's picture

Nice Post Judith

Nice post Judith - as you say no-one is going to do our work for us and history has proved that if we are not pro-active, nothing much changes.

I remember in the late 80's / early 90's in London, when we were protesting clause 28 and also trying to get the age of consent for gay men down to 16 that there was some horrendous scaremongering going on in the tabloids. Gay people were the devil incarnate.

I remember being on a tube with some friends on a Saturday afternoon, when the term "bible basher" took on a very literal meaning. One of my friends was a physically obvious bulldyke (6 foot something and built like a brick-shithouse). Anyway, there was an (I would assume) Evangelical (preacher?) on the tube with his bible, (also about 6 foot tall and built like a brick shitter) giving it the hell and damnation speech to everyone (generally trespassing on other peoples lives). He homed in on my friend and words were exchanged - You know how it goes - basically being gay was against God (in other words he was threatened by gay people, or gay himself, who the hell knows, but absolutely nothing to do with God). My friend tried to engage in intelligent argument and suddenly he attacked her. She ended up on the floor while he beat her around the head with his bible ! So, we pulled him off and got out of the bloody tube, dusted ourselves down and carried on with the day. Those were pretty dark times and the media encouraged those sorts of attitudes.

On the flipside - On the grassroots level. London was giving VERY small grants to places such as gay and lesbian hostels for homeless teenagers (my age group at the time). The people that worked in those places were paid a pittance, but I know some who worked tirelessly to fund raise (to make up shortfall in the grant), thought little of working 60-70 hour weeks and were on hand outside of work to those kids at the time all hours of the day and night. I knew both some of my age group who were using or had used these places when they came to London (usually kicked out of home for being gay) AND some of those that worked in that area (a couple had gone through the process themselves so had a full and deep understanding of the issues).

Anyway, not to go on - but the community MUST work hard for itself, be selfless, do not rely on society or the media to play catch up. Poverty is a very real issue for (especially) gay youth. But money isn't the final solution. Time invested makes a HUGE difference.

rebelgurley's picture

this is still an issue

lulabek, your anecdote from about two decades ago is still relevant today.  in the u.s. there are an estimated 1.3 million homeless youth and appoximately 40% self-identify as LGBTQ.  queer youth are over-represented amongst homeless youth because in addition to all of the reasons any average young person might find themselves homeless, queer youth also have to deal with being kicked out, pushed out, or abused into homelessness because of their sexuality or gender expression.

i think poverty is absolutely a "gay issue."  cause let's face it, what percentage of lesbians are raking in the big bucks?  especially those who don't "pass."  only in L-Word fantasy land would an unemployed writer and a hairstylist be living comfortably next door to a museum director and a movie executive.  it makes for great tv, but it's not reality.

poverty in general is a "gay issue."  specifically, queer youth homelessness certainly is a "gay issue."  in my opinion, this is one of the biggest issues facing our community.  i mean, these kids are our future.

i've only seen a couple episodes of this vlog because it seemed that the topics generally discussed weren't anything i felt passionately about.  i think DADT has got to go because it's institutionalized discrimination that promotes violence and bigotry.  i think same-sex marriage needs to happen because without it discrimination is written into our laws.  i think both marriage and the military are inherently flawed institutions and i'm not really clamoring to be included in them.  i'm not trying to get married or join the military, and neither are any of my friends.  we are however, trying to pay rent.  i would probably watch this vlog more often if it addressed "gay" issues that intersect with "non-gay" oppressions - such as class, race, sex, etc.  i think taking on poverty and the prison industrial complex are as good a place to start as any.

red08's picture

Question

 

What country has allowed gays to be out in their military?

I too can't decide about don't ask don't tell.

I just hope that one day everyone that wants to be in the military can do so without harassment .

+ Peace to all+

arodrig's picture

Canada and Israel ??

I'm thinking that at least Canada and Israel both allow out gays in the military. But this is from an article I remember from a long time ago, and I can't track it down, I may be wrong, but I don't think so, and I think that other countries were mentioned as well. Doing some checking, be back soon...

Anyone??

arodrig's picture

France, England??

I believe that France and England may allow gays in the military as well. Russia bans them as does China??

 

Anyone??

purple_squirrel's picture

I'm pretty sure that here in

I'm pretty sure that here in England its allowed, I mean its not a massive place compared to the US so you know civil partnerships were made legal everywhere in one go, and i guess changes don't take so long to happen as there's less of a diversity of beliefs.. i mean maybe the don't ask don't tell thing is staying longer in the US because its one rule for all of the US so that means with some less accepting areas it'l take longer than a smaller place?
B1T's picture

Canada

I met some Canadians during a exercise a couple of years ago and one of them was a  lesbian who was marreid and all... So I guess it's confirmed  

________________________

"We're in love. W-we're lovers. We're lesbian, gay-type lovers" - Willow

B1T's picture

Out in the Armed Forces

In Norway gays can serve and be open like everybody else. My girlfreind and I live togheter and go to each others off duty events. No problem here! I'm pretty sure that Sweden, The Netherlands and Denmark allow gays in the Military. Confirmation please!

I know that Norway had soldiers in unifrom in the Pride Parade last year (cause I was one of them)

________________________

"We're in love. W-we're lovers. We're lesbian, gay-type lovers" - Willow

arodrig's picture

Yeah!! Norway

I am now an official fan of Norway :)

-A

OceanZen76's picture

Easy answer...

EVERY NATO nation with the exception of the U.S. and Turkey.
jitka's picture

I feel dumb

but it isn't clear to me how the death penalty is a direct issue for queers...Like I see the connection for ALL human beings to feel morally responsible to combat something like the death penalty. I just don't see how the death penalty is more important to gays than don't ask, don't tell or poverty-- especially poverty seems far more immediate than death penalty,no? I feel dumb asking.
arodrig's picture

Please don't

It's not.  I do think that poverty is a much more immediate issue, it affects so many more people of course, but when the death penalty is applied, it's final, and it's applied so much more easily to people who are thought of as less socially acceptable by those who judge. Minorities, immigrants, gays..... it's just so much easier to annihilate someone who is different from you....

 

-A

Sub.Textual's picture

I agree with you, Jitka. 

I agree with you, Jitka.  I wasn't making the connection either on why the death penalty should be an immediate concern for our community either.  I understood Jon making the connection about gays being classfied as criminals in the past; but then to make the immediate leap that we should ban the death penalty because of that (and to support his anti-violence beliefs) is a stretch in my opinion.  If that indeed is the point he is making.  I admit I may not have been following either.

I think there are many more issues we could be concentrating on first that do directly affect us more immediately.

red08's picture

thanks

I would like to say "Thank You" to everyone for answering my question. A smile came to my face when i read the comments. Maybe by next year there will be more countries added to the list. 

And God Bless Norway!

 

+peace to all+

Angie5x5's picture

The military isn't just about war


For instance, the military also helps out in natural disasters. The rank and file military don't choose to go to war - our government makes that decision and I don't see the American people out in the streets protesting that decision. The military is a way out of poverty for many of us. It's a sad commentary on our society, but it's true.


User login

Recent comments

After Ellen home page on logo online