News, Reviews & Commentary on Lesbian and Bisexual women in Entertainment and the Media

"The Women": now with even more women

“There’s a word for you ladies, but it is seldom used in high society ... outside a kennel.”

That classic line from the 1939 film The Women is the perfect example of why I love the movie. Earlier this year, Anna let us know that Diane English’s long-planned remake of The Women is on again, with a cast that almost seemed too good to be true.

Now comes casting news that pushes the lineup into fantasyland (but I read it on the Internet, so it must be true). Bette Midler, Lynn Whitfield, Debi Mazar, Ana Gasteyer, Carrie Fisher, Joanna Gleason and Cloris Leachman have joined the project, which is currently shooting in Boston.

If I lived anywhere near Boston, I’d be roaming the streets to find this film set. Not that I'm condoning calling in sick and getting some pictures to post here or anything.

Here’s what we know about the characters so far. Meg Ryan plays Norma Shearer’s role, Mary Haines, a wealthy socialite whose husband is cheating on her with an attractive shop girl. Eva Mendes plays Crystal Allen, the shop girl — Joan Crawford’s part in the original. Annette Bening has Rosalind Russell’s best friend role, Sylvia Fowler. Bette Midler is the Countess DeLave, formerly played by Mary Boland, and Jada Pinkett Smith takes Paulette Goddard’s role, Miriam Aarons.

With such a prolific, award-winning cast, The Women has to be good, right? Well, no. (All the King’s Men, anyone?) Take this tidbit from the Hollywood Reporter.

English described George Cukor’s original 1939 film adaptation of Clare Boothe Luce’s all-female comedy as "a poison pen letter to society women." She added, "My version is more of a love letter.”

A love letter? Evidently, English thought that the original script was too mean-spirited, so she shifted the focus to be more about support and women's empowerment. Uh-oh. And here’s the latest movie poster.

The warmth? The compassion? The courage? What about the barbs? The one-liners? The snark? Don’t get me wrong; an empowering film with this cast would be incredible. But The Women is not that movie — or at least it shouldn’t be. Come on, Diane. A little cattiness is good for the soul.

If the movie’s original budget of $20 million hasn’t changed, these actresses are doing the film as a labor of love. I hope their confidence is well placed. Of course, I’d go see a remake of Throw Momma From the Train with this cast. But I’m crossing my fingers for a pleasant surprise.

Do you have hope for the remake? What about the cast? Could they pull off a script with the rapid-fire wit of the original? Will you see this movie regardless of the reviews? Or will you simply rent the 1939 version and enjoy the classic bitchfest? Oh, and if you found the film shoot, give us the scoop.

  • thelinster's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Fliss's picture

    Definitely still worth a watch

    I still have high hopes for The Women. With such an amazing cast it must be quite good at least. Definitely still worth a watch regardless of what the Hollywood Reporter says.
    violetsnvalium's picture

    Agree, but...

    I'll take wisecracks over support groups any day too.

    But then I have been secretly in love with Lynn Whitfield for about TEN YEARS now, and she's going to be on the same screen as Debi Mazar? I don't know if I'll even hear anything anyone says.

    MyNumber99's picture

    I go to school in Boston,

    I go to school in Boston, and I've seen signs for the set all over the place. The catering trucks were set up right on my school's street. I have not, however, seen any actual filming going on, nor have I seen any of these lovely ladies around.

    -----------------

    Go and love some more.

    samfeasor's picture

    Is that definitely for The

    Is that definitely for The Women? I don't know how sets are marked, but I know that Kate Hudson's movie is filming here, too, using the Suffolk campus (no idea where you go to school, just saying there's another movie filming at or around a school).

    I'd totally stalk (in a non creepy way) the Divine Miss M if I knew where to look.

    lunakiss's picture

    The title alone

    is worth seeing.  I'm a big fan of classic movies and whenever one is remade I  usually like to go see them.  LynnWhitfield is a underrated phenomenal actress and a very beautiful womyn. Of course anything with Eva Mendes is in(with whom I got a secret crush on)I'm game. 
    cosmiccowgirl's picture

    Now I can't stop picturing

    Now I can't stop picturing the remake of Throw Mamma from the Train with this cast. I kind of wish they would make that instead.
    angel winters's picture

    The Movie, The Play

    so far I have hope for the remake....I hope its as good as the original movie and hopefully it will be as great as the play was...2001 I remember watching it around NYC when Cynthia Nixon played Mary Haines here's a link for the cast info...you'll see a few familiar lesbian names http://www.ibdb.com/production.asp?ID=12906 
    pureharmonix's picture

    I'm not a big believer in

    I'm not a big believer in reviews...I'll go see this movie purely for the cast.  No matter how sucky the rest is, the acting will be phenomenal.
    locachica's picture

    I'm not looking forward to this film....

    Some things are better left untouched, and THE WOMEN is one of them. Why mess with perfection? Yes, the cast for the remake is stellar, but IMHO no one will ever equal the very lovely Roz Russell(who stole the first movie) or the very gorgeous Paulette Goddard. I highly recommend seeing the 1939 version if you haven't already.
    Leslie G Hill's picture

    I agree

    It is hard to imagine any remake could be as stellar as the original. It is one I can rewatch without losing any of the pleasure. I am sure I will enjoy the new cast and love watching them together, but I wish they were in an original film - not a redo of something so wonderful the first time around.
    Slym's picture

    I Got

    excited at the beginning, lost interest towards the end but I'm thinking to myself with that many "women" and with them all having such great talent and all..... I just might... I don't think I could resist a film with Eva, Jada, Meg, Candice and Cloris (absolutely love her) in it... so I guess....
    the S O V's picture

    I love this play! Although

    I love this play! Although some of these actresses are surprising picks for their respective roles. And the play takes place in New York City, so I guess Boston is the modern-day equivilant of NYC....? Weird. The character to watch out for is Nancy, who could very easily have been a lesbian, in fact, I wrote a paper proving so last semester for a class. We shall see....
    tarrabbit's picture

    i'd prefer not...

    ... to condemn the script or its intention, all of which I know nothing about. The talent behind this project gives credence to the potential.

     

    I applaud and support the ability for a female centric film to have garnered the budget required to attach such a fine cast in what has become an increasingly tough male ceiling to break through for women filmmakers making films for women (gay or straight).
    smokinbluegrass's picture

    noooooooooooooooooooooooooo

    Oh. My. Hell. Love letter my ass. If English wants to re-make movies about letters, metaphorical or otherwise, then let her re-make "A Letter to Three Wives." Of course, that film would be an easy one to jack up, too. On second thought, Diane, how's about just re-making "Murphy Brown."
    boston's picture

    i walked by filming in a

    i walked by filming in a store at the corner of boylston and arlington, but no actresses were in sight.

    User login

    Recent comments

    After Ellen home page on logo online