Welcome to AfterEllen.com!

Enter your AfterEllen.com username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
News, Reviews & Commentary on Lesbian and Bisexual women in Entertainment and the Media

The truth about "Lying"

You know how sometimes, you’re in the mood for a different kind of movie? You click through every one of the 576 channels on cable — nothing. You peruse Hulu and AT&T and other perfectly legal online movie sites — meh. So, you hop on your Harley and hustle over to Hollywood Video to peruse the shelves.

Within minutes, you see it.

Starring Chloë Sevigny;

Leelee Sobieski;

Jena Malone;

and that girl in the background who was Grace’s friend on The Book of DanielHalley Wegryn Gross. That was such a good show.

You turn the DVD over.

“When a long weekend brings four women together in the countryside, each of them in forced to navigate the depths of social interaction as virtual strangers.” Cool. And Henry Gummer is in it — that has to be Meryl Streep’s son. More cool.

Quick Google search on the iPhone brings up a goofy-but-endearing interview with Sevigny.

Sounds like Sevigny is proud of Lying. And it was a Cannes selection a couple of years ago. Must be a winner.

So you grab the box and take it to the counter and ask the girl if she’s seen it. “No, but we have some used ones over there for $5.” You grab one because hey,Chloë and Jena. It’s gotta be worth $5, right?

Um, wrong.

Lying is a mess. I think it’s supposed to be a satire about spoiled rich kids, but it just doesn’t work. It feels like a film school project from a student who thinks he’s the modern day Bergman but has no real future in film. Director M.Blash uses a lot of random elements that I’m sure are meant to symbolize something deep and meaningful. But nothing ever comes of them. Here’s the trailer:

BTW, the fuzziness and paleness of the trailer is not due to loss of resolution in video transfer. That’s the way the whole movie looks. It’s artsy, you know.

I have to tell you, I’m really not all that picky about movies. I can find something to like in almost anything, especially if the film stars women I admire — but I wish I’d skipped Lying.

If you want another opinion, check out the review at Newsblaze. Then use your $5 for candy and re-watch Boys Don’t Cry and Saved! to see Chloë and Jena in movies worthy of their talent.

Has anyone else seen Lying? What did you think? Do you ever watch bad movies just for the pretty faces?

  • the linster's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • kulhaha's picture

    oh leelee

    leelee was my first love, back when she was Joan of Arc in the TV movie version.  that said, I still won't be renting this.
    nataniasmom's picture

    I loved Chloe in "Part

    I loved Chloe in "Part Monster"

    I also lovd Boys don't cry and Saved.

    I ahd never heard of this movie.

    I actually really like artsy-fartsy movies, but I will probably take your word for it and skip this one, lol.

    on_earth09's picture

    The house

    is really pretty in the trailer =)

    Let's get one thing straight, I'm not.

    Aya's picture

    No Offense

    But none of these 3 women have really been in that many good movies.
    Jazzbie's picture

    Wow i thought this was a student project

    Or some ultra low-budget film fastival movie, the picture quality and lighting is laughably bad :/


    crapshack's picture

    Actually

    After I seeing the trailer I kinda REALLY want to see the movie. Personally, I really really like those kinds of super low budget artsy movies and your negative opinion makes me even more curious to see it. Can't wait to find it.

    And if the movie really turns to be bad - well at least it had a couple beauties in it. ;) 

    GreenBean2's picture

    Even the dvd cover looks

    Even the dvd cover looks awful :(
    Lunakiss's picture

    Low-Quality Films

    This film looks interesting.  I adore LeeLee S.  She was phenonmonal in Joan of Arc. I,too, like crapshack, low- quality  films.

    I will rent this film this week.

    Yes, I'm willing to take that risk.

    imaginarygirl's picture

    Crapshack

    Omg. That word cracked me up...cannot stop laughing...must incorporate into my vocabulary...
    Raelynn Harrison's picture

    I really wanna...

    see this movie now!
    7Up's picture

    Have a problem with "artsy" films, are you a pop film snob?

    I like "artsy" films so don't knock them if you don't mind.  They have to work of course..... but there are many more ways for a film to work than the Hollywood / Indie Sundance model.  I'm sick of formula films anyway, especially how many indie films are equally starting to blur into one another these days....    So I'm going to be daring even if I find the film dull, and I've added it to my netflix.... 

    I had no preblem with the quality of the shooting, but I did find the randomness of the trailor... well, random.    Constantly being stared down by Chloe was sort of disturbing, but then potentially interesting. 

    the linster's picture

    Huh?

    I was poking fun at attempts to be artsy, as film students often do. Context is everything.
    Deb's picture

    saw the trailer and the

    saw the trailer and the cinematography reminded me of a cheap version of 'the virgin suicides'. which i love, so i might watch this.
    J.D.'s picture

    looks familiar

    I am living on a farm in the middle of nowhere in Sweden, sharing house with two other girls. And the trailer, although looking very cheesy, kinda feels familiar. I really want to watch this movie now and see if I can relate to it, or if it's really wannabe artsy crap as you describe it to be.

    --
    Is that so?

    dragonlady07's picture

    um

    leelee sobieski as one of the leads and we are surprised it was bad? regardless of looks, girl can't act.
    alex's picture

    halley wegryn-gross!

    she's a good friend of my best friend from high school, and he has fantastic taste, so i'd be inclined to give this one a chance!

    --------
    http://rightmindleftcoast.wordpress.com
    zakelina's picture

    this movie..

    if you came up to my hollywood video i would have told you that this movie is a no go. i rented it at work thinking that it looked pretty gay and non-ambiguous about it, but there was none of that. i know what you are saying, so many things about it look promising, but it sucked the bag. i dont know if the whole concept of the movie went over my head, or if it just plain didnt have a concept.
    Linda's picture

    the trailer is kinda

    the trailer is kinda intruiging lol

    and oh chloe. so gorgeous.