Welcome to AfterEllen.com!

Enter your AfterEllen.com username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
News, Reviews & Commentary on Lesbian and Bisexual women in Entertainment and the Media

Katherine Heigl and the killing of Izzie Stevens

Let's talk about Katherine Heigl. After all, everyone else is.

Unless you've been in seclusion, you're probably familiar with the Katherine Heigl brouhaha. (Isn't brouhaha a great word?) Heigl withdrew her name from Emmy consideration — even though we'll never know if she was in consideration in the first place — saying that she just didn't have any Emmy-worthy material on Grey’s Anatomy last season. Let me pause here to give you some wisdom that you can carry with you the rest of your life: never, ever piss off a writer. We've got words; we know how to use 'em.

The interwebs have been ablaze with talk that Grey’s showrunner/writer Shonda Rhimes has decided to kill off Heigl’s character, Izzie, as a result of Heigl’s comment. At TCA last week, Rhimes said that she was surprised at Heigl’s remarks, but not insulted, and that they have a great story planned for Izzie. (I just bet they do.)

Meanwhile, US magazine reports that two sources close to Grey’s revealed that the “great story” just might be that Izzie gets a brain tumor. We know that Denny (Jeffrey Dean Morgan) will appear this coming season — perhaps to greet Izzie at the pearly gates?

In any case, bloggers have been having a field day planning Izzie’s demise. Here are some of my favorites.

New York magazine calls for Heigl to be struck by a meteor, pulled apart by a pack of lions right in the middle of the ER or to simply explode for no reason — any of which could easily happen in the wacky world of Seattle Grace.

The Greek Prospectus suggests several scenarios outrageous enough to fit Grey’s modus operandi. My favorite is this description of Izzie’s death by terminal disease:

As the hospital deals with the tragedy of the news, Izzie begins to learn acceptance of her fate, and a desire to do good with the time she has left in the world. As she stands at the window contemplating her life and the little time she has left, a shark jumps through the window and eats her.

Land shark!

That led to a couple of ideas of my own: In a callback to an earlier story, Izzie falls off of the pier in the middle of an emergency as a little girl watches. When George notices her missing, the little girl leads him to the pier, just in time to see Izzie sink into the water for the last time. George shrugs and walks away.

Or, in a gracious nod to Katherine Heigl’s previous series (in which her name was Isabel — weird, huh?), aliens come to earth to reclaim their own. It happens away from the hospital, so her colleagues think she simply disappeared. The season’s first catchphrase comes from Bailey, who asks throughout the episode, “Where’s Stevens?”

In Nerve’s “Top 10 Ways ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Should Kill Off Izzie,” Ben suggests that Izzie jump out of a moving car to avoid having to listen one more time to Meredith whine about McDreamy. Or that she gets a dramatic, three-episode death scene like Jimmy Smits on NYPD Blue — and regrets offending the Emmy folks.

Of course, I saved the best for last, also from Nerve:

She has a threesome with Callie and Erica Hahn, then expires from exhaustion.

What a way to go.


Photo credit: Randy Holmes/ABC

Can you, um, top that? What’s the best fate for Izzie?

  • the linster's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Elisabeth's picture

    Dont die!

    I admit i loathed the Izzie/George stoyline, but theyre done with that now right? I always liked her character and i like Heigl. She a good actress and i like what she has to say. I seriously hope they dont kill her off, coz i really dont think that would benefit the show, lol. Shonda Rhimes should totally be a good sport, and not take it that bad. So no, im all for keeping Izzie alive :D.

    But a threesome with Callie and Hahn, i am all for that!!

    Nelfy's picture

    I think I peed my pants

    "George shrugs and walks away" - could you be any funnier?? I doubt that!!

    another great way to get rid of her, without killing her, would be if callie told erica about izzie cutting the lvad-wire and then erica would force the chief to fire izzie. see, easy, makes sense, and no death involved!! but I somehow doubt that they'll kill izzie off, katherine heigl has a strong fanbase after all.

    I don't like the threesome idea - I mean come on, she has not deserved to see any of those two wonderful ladies naked, let alone have sex with them. we wouldn't want to do that to erica and callie, they deserve better!!

    http://babydyke.blogspot.com/ - my take on all things lesbian

    SweetTalentedOne's picture

    Hmmm...

    I don't know if it was an insult or not, but she was right.  She really didn't have much of a story line this past season.  Up until this past season she had really deep story lines, but other than the akwardness with George and trying to save whats his face from Eva this season there wasn't anything there for her. 

    SweetTalentedOne

    imthey's picture

    Katherine Heigl...

    The whole story about Katherine Heigl and how so many people got in an uproar when she dared to speak her mind just sort of reminds me of when women are called bitches for speaking their minds and being tough yet men are considered leaders, etc. Yes, it could probably have been handled with a bit more diplomacy/tact, but Katherine wasn't really wrong with her comment, was she? I mean, let's be honest she really didn't have an Emmy worthy year this past season on Grey's.  I mean while other characters were saving people, she was saving a deer (just to cite one example).

    I do think that she did the right thing though by removing her name from consideration, since far too often I find myself shaking my head in disbelief over who ends up winning the Emmy, thinking that they only won because they won the year before and not because they were most deserving of the win for this particular year. 

    In the end the entire thing could have been handled better by Katherine, who probably didn't need to explain why she felt the need to take her name off the list, but since she did and was really only being truthful, I also think that people should just get over the whole thing and not continue to make a "mountain of of the proverbial molehill" with Katherine's comments. It sort of ends up being a damned if you do/damned if you don't situation.

     

    (Self Appointed) "#1 Bridget McManus Fan"

    I M THEY ("Think Sideways")

    beija-me's picture

    Yes, yes, yes!

    The whole story about Katherine Heigl and how so many people got in an uproar when she dared to speak her mind just sort of reminds me of when women are called bitches for speaking their minds and being tough yet men are considered leaders, etc.

    That is exactly what I have been saying for quite some time now!  I'm astonished at some of the horribly offensive things that I have read people say about her in reference to other comments she has made (such as the one about Knocked Up being sexist).  The thing is, she is almost always right (at least in my opinion), so my explanation for why people get so riled up about her being opinionated is that whole idea that beautiful women should just shut up and look pretty.

    the linster's picture

    More to the story

    One thing Shonda said at TCA was that Heigl actually asked for Izzie to be written "lighter" during the second half of the season, since K.H. was working on a movie. It seems disingenuous to ask for less of a storyline and then say that she wasn't given Emmy material.
    LD82's picture

    How did this story get out there?

    Did she volunteer this information or was she asked a question about the Emmy's?  To me, this whole story sounds like a Public Relations hit job.

     Pesonally I like Chandra Wilson's response: 

    http://www.etonline.com/news/2008/07/63196/index.html

    "At a press conference Tuesday for her upcoming Hallmark Channel movie, "An Accidental Friendship," Wilson said, "It's amazing to me that it got so blown out of proportion. If you ask every single actor on every single show they'll tell you the same thing. Some years you submit, some years you don't."

    She explained, "I think the public doesn't understand -- it's not about your body of work -- it's about the show [and] especially when you deal with the drama category, it has to be high drama. It can't be something in the middle."

    In early June, Heigl disclosed that she had not submitted her name to be considered for an Emmy this year for her work on "Grey's Anatomy.""

     

    the linster's picture

    She was asked

    Read stunt double's post for the story. She was asked, but not baited - and her response was in the form of an official statement, not an off-the-cuff remark. So while her not submitting her name is understandable, the wording of her statement certainly could be construed as a criticism of the writers. If she didn't mean it that way, it's her publicist who needs writing help!
    monica_ca's picture

    To me

    I think that it's all about interpretation of Heigl's remarks...to me it wasn't meant to be taken in a bad way.  I didn't read it as a shot to the writers AT ALL.  I think that if you go into it reading it assuming the worst, then you'll get that interpretation.  I agree that this whole thing has been blown out of proportion, and from my perspective, seems like an honest misunderstanding more than anything else.
    pecola's picture

    Katherine Heigl = Scott McClellan

    My criticism has nothing to do with her speaking her mind. If she spoke her mind, I'd applaud her, but that's not what she does. She's an opportunist and only speaks out when it's beneficial to her professionally. I'm not going to support her right to put her foot in her mouth and a knife in the back of her friends out of some sense of faux-feminism. Katherine Heigl is the Scott McClellan of primetime television and both are worthy of ridicule.

    Show me an actor that's been able to publicly admonish his boss on MULTIPLE occassions and gotten away it. Shonda Rhimes should've let Heigl go last year when she tried to extort more money from ABC. 

    -----

    "The spirit of liberty is the spirit which is not too sure that it is right..." - Judge Learned Hand, The Spirit of Liberty

    the fallen's picture

    Sorry...

    But she pulled similar crap with her comments about the movie Knocked Up. Talking trash about a massive hit she was in, acting surprised that when she signed up for a movie by the creators of The 40 Year Old Virgin,they might make a movie that was not all that enlightened towards women. She was shocked, SHOCKED.  I'm over her.
    Penny Winterr's picture

    Tina Fey

    Forget about Katherine Heigl...you posted that picture of Tina Fey!  Hey, I can't even read any more...my eyes have fallen out of my head, and my brain is oozing out of my ears.

    Tina is a goddess!

    Swwwwwwwwwwoooooooooooooooon

    the linster's picture

    Ha!

    My evil scheme worked. :)
    queen.onda.scene's picture

    Tina!

    All I could think about was Tina Fey! I started wondering if that picture was planted to distract us from the rest of the story!
    beija-me's picture

    I like Katherine Heigl

    and have ever since her Roswell days.  Maybe she shouldn't have made such a public proclamation, but I also don't understand why everyone seems to have the idea that writers should be immune from criticism.  Personally I thought that Izzy did have a lame storyline this past season and I thought the writing for Season 4 was pretty weak in general (at least compared to previous seasons). 

    I really respect writers and all that they do, but just as I will be more than happy to praise excellent writing, I have no problem whatsoever calling out bad writing.  Lots of people are saying that Katherine Heigl is "biting the hand that feeds", which may be true.  But it's also true that she said what I know for a fact that a lot of people were thinking.  I hope that she doesn't get killed off because I like her character.  I think she adds an important dynamic to the show, and something would be missing without her -- just as it would if Cristina or Meredith were to exit.

    Through_the_Rye's picture

    I also don't understand why

    I also don't understand why everyone seems to have the idea that writers should be immune from criticism.

    Yeah, I don't get that either. If they're doing a bad job, they should get called out. They do that on AfterEllen for The L Word writers all the time!

     

    Through_the_Rye's picture

    Wow, this is mean. I can't

    Wow, this is mean. I can't believe people are plotting her character's death just because she spoke her mind.

    If some male actor said what she said, he'd probably be applauded for being assertive and telling the truth. But if it's an an outspoken woman, it's all "oh my god, we have to fire that bitch!"

    Pirategrrrl's picture

    If I've said it once ...

    I've said it a million times (well ... really, three other times) ...

    DON'T BITE THE HAND THAT FEEDS YOU!!!!

    And yes, Linster, Brouhaha is a FABULOUS word! :D

    Hmmm ... my ideal scenario?

    As she's falling into the water on the ferry dock, she becomes the unwitting victim of a certain Pirate's Krakken, who currently resides in Elliot Bay ...

     

    My treasure is my gallant bark,
    My only God is liberty;
    My law is might, the wind my mark,
    My country is the sea.

    Niuxita's picture

    I would send Shonda Rhimes

    I would send Shonda Rhimes flowers (and I don't even LIKE Shonda) if she actually went through with killing off Izzie (which totally won't happen, but I can dream right?) Gah, Katherine Heigl just BUGS. It's not even just about the whole "withdrawing her name from the Emmys" thing, it just seems that every time she opens her mouth she does or says something completely off-putting. Too bad she's staying in Grey's, because if she indeed left, it would be almost incentive enough for me to start watching again (almost, because I still hate McDreamy with the passion of a million burning suns).

    The possible death scenarios were fun to read, though! Especially the shark-jumping one and this one:

    Ben suggests that Izzie jump out of a moving car to avoid having to listen one more time to Meredith whine about McDreamy.

    Bwah! So true!

    murk's picture

    This is very clever and all

    But perhaps we should be examining how the media is joyously celebrating the potential downfall of an outspoken woman once again, instead of adding to it?
    Through_the_Rye's picture

    I too find that very

    I too find that very disturbing. Were there lists like this when Isaiah Washington was rumored to be getting the axe?
    notshane's picture

    you may have a point

    I'm not keen on Katherine Heigl, but you're probably right about the media setting her up as an uppity woman as she speaks her mind.

    So I reckon we should beware of adding to the hostile frenzy out there.

    Sub.Textual's picture

    Oh, please.  The woman is

    Oh, please.  The woman is not 'speaking her mind' she's throwing a fit because she wants out of her contract and has now ever since her budding movie career took off.  So, when she doesn't get her way what does she do?  She decides to piss on her peers and the people that got her to where she could actually HAVE a movie career to begin with.  The writers.  That's gratitude for you.  I'm all for her being written off and post-haste.  The only problem with that is that the snippity little girl will then get her way and what will we have done?  Nothing but reward bad behavior.  Fantastic!
    murk's picture

    I'm not really interested in

    I'm not really interested in debating the merits or lack thereof of her behavior. The point is the criticism of her seems very over-the-top and to me, demonstrates once again that the media is much more interested in tearing down women then reporting on things objectively. It's sad to see a woman-positive site like this following the trend rather than critiquing it.
    writerchick's picture

    Not woman bashing

    I don't think this article is tearing down women. It's all in good fun and about the demise of a fictional character, not a real one! Katherine's career will go on with or without Grey's. Don't take it all so seriously!
    murk's picture

    Yes, it's all in good fun

    Yes, it's all in good fun how we're cheering on giving a woman a major career setback. I suppose I shouldn't worry about the media's tendency to distort and inflate any controversy that erupts around female celebrities. I guess I should just lie back and enjoy it, shouldn't I?
    Pirategrrrl's picture

    I'm sorry ...

    but "we" are not giving anyone anything ... she did that to herself. She spoke, to the press, on record ... and as far as the "distortion" and inflation of controversy surrounding female celebrities ... to whom else are you referring?

    Writers are not above censorship, but neither are actors.

    My treasure is my gallant bark,
    My only God is liberty;
    My law is might, the wind my mark,
    My country is the sea.

    murk's picture

    Nobody's saying that Heigl

    Nobody's saying that Heigl isn't responsible for her own words. What I'm saying, once again, is that the media seems to be taking an inordinate pleasure in her imminent punishment, much as they seem to do with many other female public figures. I'm sure I don't need to list names for you. And I will also repeat that it disappoints me to see a woman-positive site join in on the kneejerk bashing rather than take a more critical look at the subject.
    Pirategrrrl's picture

    It seems that your argument ...

    Is contradictory.

    You acknowledge that she is responsible for her statement, yet, you are upset with the media for commenting on said statement ... through "pleasureable punishment"?

    Yet, wouldn't you agree that the media is only reporting on her statement? And this is not the first time her statements (and their consequent responsibilities) have landed her in the spotlight. Also, I don't think you can qualify most of the blogs that Linster sited as "media" ... primarily since they are mostly Op.Ed. pieces (as blogs are wont to be).

    I really don't think that the media singles out women to "pleasurably torture" ... I think they single out anyone, regardless of gender, who will get them ratings and news ... Mel Gibson, Tom Cruise, David Beckham ... and another Grey's Anatomy former cast-mate who also made some statements, for which *he* had to become responsible.

    My treasure is my gallant bark,
    My only God is liberty;
    My law is might, the wind my mark,
    My country is the sea.

    murk's picture

    Actually, no, I don't think

    Actually, no, I don't think fantasizing about myriad ways her character should die constitutes "only reporting on the story." And if you don't consider New York magazine--or the Los Angeles Times--media, then I'd like to know what is.

    I really don't think that the media singles out women to "pleasurably torture"

    Really. Yes, because obviously the substance abuse problems of Steven Tyler and Ron Wood are covered with exactly the same kind of frenzy and insatiability as Britney, Lindsay, Amy, et al. And there's no institutionalized sexism in the media whatsoever.

    Your world must have a pretty purple sky.

     

    Pirategrrrl's picture

    If you think ...

    "Dish Rag" by Elizabeth Snead is credible media (rather than an Op.Ed. blog as I suggested above) ... you must also be a fan of US Weekly and the National Enquirer. You know ... publications like NY Mag. or the LA Times have their ludicrous fluff as well ... and no. I stand by what I said earlier ... publications like "Dish Rag" are not in existence to report the story, but to get ratings.

    There's a difference between an Op. Ed. piece and a report.

    WOW. You gave examples of Britney and Lindsey?? Yep, those women are clearly shining gems of the female sex ...nothing ludicrous about THEM!

    interestingly enough, Steven Tyler and Ronnie Woods and their drug addictions were BIG news 20+ years ago - I'm surprised you didn't mention Keith Richards (because his drug use is so up-and-coming) ... Again, I cite Mel Gibson and Tom Cruise. Oh! and while I'm at it ... Pete Dougherty and Kate Moss ... They didn't just focus on her ... he's become a much bigger media joke.

    They're out to sell papers, to get readers ... they don't care WHO they use.

    And no ... my sky isn't purple (scary and Willy Wonka like!) ... but it's clear ... CRYSTAL clear (LA is good for that).

     

    My treasure is my gallant bark,
    My only God is liberty;
    My law is might, the wind my mark,
    My country is the sea.

    the fallen's picture

    Really?

    Steven Tyler and Ron Wood have been addicts for pushing at least three decades each, so the fact that no one feels the need to report on it might have something to do with the fact that there are only about twenty people in the world who haven't known since their first year of Kindergarten that Tyler used to be a cokehead. And as has been celebrities no one gives a flying f*** what they do or don't inhale or slurp up. Old ugly addicts don't sell papers, young hot messes like linds and Brit do. Sexism? No. Capitalism? YES!
    notshane's picture

    Hmm...that's often how its labelled...

    when women are taken down a peg or two - which incessantly happens in the media. It's all just a bit of fun...don't you have a sense of humour?

     

    addie25's picture

    my fav scenario... send

    my fav scenario... send Stevens to LA hook her up with Addison - and I'll be a happiest woman on earth :)
    llandorian's picture

    Exactly my thought...

    Addison + Izzy = McEvenHotter!

    Just to make a light comment in this rapidly darker becoming discussion, here is my fav scenario:

    1. Izzy moves to LA, gets hired by Addie and they hook up.

    2. Erica and Callie get a real good, long storyarc with a little drama, then they hook up.

    3. Thirteen and Cuddy make out to annoy House, but find that they have feelings for each other and then hook up...ups, wrong show

    3. Meredith falls of that pier again, the show is renamend to "No more whining", and I'll finally hook up.

    Just the 2ct of my conflict avoidant self...

    AMN's picture

    I agree....

    ....with murk.  I think if it were a male doing exactly the same thing, he would be applauded for his stand.  A woman doing the same thing though, and she made out to be a money-hungry, power-starved prima donna.

    I like Katherine Heigl because she's willing to speak her mind, and willing to live with the consquences of those actions.  I think she just has high standards and expectations for herself.  Really, her character last year was annoying in every way....and even more so than Meredith (who usually leaves me reaching for the mute button).

    Considering it's Hollywood and a contract has about as much value as a used piece of toilet paper, if she wanted out, there is more than likely a way that she could get it done.

    Any road is a good road when you don't know where you're going.

    mimi's picture

    Heigl has a history of

    Heigl has a history of biting the hand that feeds her. I don't need the media to point out bad behaviour, I can spot it all on my own (Just like the Emmys can decide what is truly worthy of a nomination.)

    She didn't do anything ethical or exemplary, what she did was make an assumption she would even get nominated at all. And an assumption that her peers love her so much, they'd overlook her "poor" storyline. If that isn't a sign of a rampant ego, I don't know what is.

    Put Izzie in a long-term coma and leave her there. The gang can have lunch in her room and she can lay there like the boring 2 x 4  her acting generally reminds me of.

     

    trihardist's picture

    All in good fun

    Because I like Heigl's character and thought that her storylines provided some necessary comic relief (besides which, would George and Callie have broken up if not for Izzie? and if they hadn't, would we ever have such swoon-worthy kisses between two hot female doctors?)

    Still. Izzie Stevens' spontaneous combustion, coupled with a few more kisses shared between the aforementioned hot female doctors, would be more than enough to keep me watching Grey's Anatomy this season.

    Assuming said doctors do not try to have a baby or a threesome with anyone male. 

    ---------------------

    "From error to error, one discovers the entire truth."

    - Sigmund Freud 

    Trihardist's Blog
    AMN's picture

    Perfect example

    I find this situation to be a perfect example of how we judge people based on our own experiences and views (I'm including myself in this lump pile).

    We read about the actress, see her on TV, get a brief glimpse into her world, and we get a sense that we know her and her motivations.  While some see it as an ego-charged move, others see her as being head-strong.  What I think really gets lost in the shuffle though is that we have no clue who these people really are.  We don't know them or the reasons behind their motivation.

    I agree that her acting isn't anything stellar, and that I wouldn't really miss the Izzy character should she be booted to the curb - she's annoyed me since season two.  And, I probably won't see many, if any, of the films she's in because I just don't really enjoy that genre.

    That being said, I still like Katherine for being willing to speak her mind, and deal with the consquences as they come.  I get sick of celebrities giving lip service and keeping everything within the safe cliches.

    Maybe it was ego-driven to make a deal out keeping her name off the Emmy ballots.   Maybe she was just ensuring a spot was left open for someone she felt was more worthy, in case she was nominated.  I don't know....I can, however, see both sides of the argument.  I just kept going back to we don't know her motivation behind the choice.

    Regardless of all of it....Grey's is going to have get stellar again to keep my interest.  All the girls got whiney and self-absorbed last year.  I can get enough of that in real life.  Let this show be the reality escape that it should be.

    Any road is a good road when you don't know where you're going.

    LD82's picture

    Nicely said

    I agree totally.

    Hank's picture

    dramatic.

    I think she has a point; she didn't haev much of a storyline this season, and definitely not enough to earn an award, but I think the way she expressed it could have been different. Not to say she should spare feelings, but I eh. I dunno. I can't speak for everyone else, but i'd never heard of her before Grey's, so I kinda think blasting the show that made your name kinda big is a bad move.

    I don't think they should kill off Dr. Stephens, though because even though she's not one of my favorites, she brings a dynamic to the show and all the other characters have a piece that bounces off of hers, just like she is made up of a piece of all the other characters. It would throw the whole equilibrium of the show off. i mean they already got rid of Burke (which killed me inside, now that I'm catching up on the show and am successfully obsessed.)

     

    I got a dick like a mule...with a big dick.

    Henna79's picture

    Everyone...

    should just give the girl a break. She just pointed out, and i really support that statement, that Izzie really haven´t had that great of a storyline season 4...

    The last 2-3 episodes just about saved her character from total disaster, in my opinion. I really hope they don´t kill her off. It´s enough that Addisson is of in Lala Land checking out half naked surfer boys ... =) If Izzies gone, well that would be just sad. So keep the woman alive, give her a better storyline and please continue hooking up Hahn and Callie ... and I´m all good.. =)

    Cheers people!

    ghostyouknow's picture

    never piss off the writers...

    I never did like Katherine Heigl, and although I too was disappointed with the last season of Grey's (well up until the Callie and Erica story line) I think Katherine Heigl is a jerk for pretty much bad mouthing the writers, the very same people who created a show that made her a 'celebrity'... no one (except the Roswell fans out there) knew who she was before Shonda Rhymes came along... so I think instead of killing her character:

    Izzie decides to bake a cake one day, when all of a sudden she starts to choke on it and then falls into the oven, the accident then causes her to go into a coma, indefinitly, so she ends up spending her days in a room at Seatle Grace Hospital... and most of the scenes in the show should take place in her hospital room, where she just lies there, motionless and speechless in the background, while the other characters recite the awesome words written by the writers who have had an ephiphany on how to improve the show, back to the entertaining show it once was.

    the end.

    drip's picture

    I liked Roswell *because*

    I liked Roswell *because* Heigl was in it..and I have been crushing on her since she was in that movie with Gerard-french-guy-with-big-snozz.

    Actually,come to think of it.. I think Heigl was my first lesbian celebrity crush. Actually... yes.. yes she was... and we are talking yeeeears here.

     

    P.S Movie was called My Father The Hero..and it came out in 1994.. and she was only 16.. dear god. Hot in a bikini tho ;) (sorry..objectifying again..bad drip!!)

    Journey_Wmn's picture

    I think that she was just

    I think that she was just using the media to manipulate the writers to get a better storyline, and even though she probably won't lose her job, that move wasn't the smartest one. Just my two cents on her speaking out. Anyway on how Izzie should die, I say that no matter how she goes George should go with her, because I can't stand either of their characters. So I see 2 options

    1. George and Izzie unable to cope with their inability to maintain healthy, fufilling relationships they decide to carry out a murder suicide pact.

    or

    2. George and Lexie get together and then George and Izzie cheat together again. Lexie snaps under the pressure of her father's alcoholism and now the reality of George cheating and she kills them both.

     

     

    "Power is never given back. When it's stolen, if you want it back, you have to take it." - M. Caballero

    Journey2enlightenment.blogspot.com

    Nepheline's picture

    Typewriters are hot

    ...especially when certain people are wrapped around them. Thanks for throwing Tina Fey in there, because there's really no good reason for her picture to not appear in every blog post.
    abbagirl's picture

    sayonara

    i thought she started being annoying way back during the denny-izzy-alex love triangle.  i do have a thing for cute blonds in general, as she is -- but at the same time, izzy needs to go.  don't care how -- but must be pronto!  

    Lauren's picture

    but she's right

    Her storyline sucked this season. They would never kill her off because it would be bad for the show.
    drip's picture

    I've had a crush on Heigl

    I've had a crush on Heigl since way back when she starred with Gerard Depardeau (or however his name is spelt.. the guy with big snozz) in that movie where she pretended her father (Gerard) was her boyfriend to get the attention of some guy. Not a great movie but she was hot in a bikini. eidted to add: Movie was My Father The Hero, it was in 1994 when Heigl was only 16, but I repeat myself)

    I'm noticing a few really good points in this thread.

    1) George should definitely be killed off (he irks me)

    2) everyone seems to know what Katherine's motive was when nobody really knows her at all.

    3) if she were a man she'd probably be hailed as a strong willed person

    4) that people seem to think tearing women apart is more capitalist than sexism. When really, if tearing women apart is what sells the magazines (capitalist) then shouldn't we be examining the mindset of the broader population who buys these magazines who finds it acceptable to support and join in on capitalist-motivated attacks (which is where the sexism comes in).

    5) Izzy had some crap storylines this season

    6) the sun does not shine out the rear ends of the writers, despite what alot of people think. They are human, and although many are talented, even Da Vinci had bad days and produced utter crap.

    Pirategrrrl's picture

    Can you please ...

    ...explain to me how you are automatically linking sexism with capitalism?

    that people seem to think tearing women apart is more capitalist than sexism. When really, if tearing women apart is what sells the magazines (capitalist) then shouldn't we be examining the mindset of the broader population who buys these magazines who finds it acceptable to support and join in on capitalist-motivated attacks (which is where the sexism comes in).

    The point that some of us are trying to make is that it's not a sexist issue at all ... that men get exploited just as much as women in this arena ...

    How exactly do "capitalist motivated attacks" equal sexism?

     

    My treasure is my gallant bark,
    My only God is liberty;
    My law is might, the wind my mark,
    My country is the sea.