Star-studded politics, or my celebrity's better than your celebrityIt's January. Election Day is ten months away. Yet the campaign has been underway for several months already. And as expected, I am already bored with it. I have no idea who I will vote for come November, and I likely won't know until I actually cast my vote behind the little curtain of my portable voting booth. What I do know is that the face of Chuck Norris was grinning at me from behind Mike Huckabee when he congratulated himself on a victory in the Iowa caucuses last week. And I asked myself, "What the hell is Chuck Norris doing in Iowa? And why does he look like a life-sized plastic cutout of himself?" I'm guessing you may be asking yourself a similar question right now. Namely, what the hell does this have to do with women in entertainment? Well, Chuck Norris' plastic mug got me thinking about the role of celebrity in politics. Politics is one big popularity contest, after all, the likes of which many of us dreaded in junior high. So, does having a celebrity by your side actually get you anywhere in politics? Actually being a celebrity worked well for Ronald Reagan, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jesse "The Body" Ventura. But does having the vocal support of Oprah Winfrey and Halle Berry actually do anything for Barack Obama come election day?
There has to be something to this celebrity endorsement thing, right? It's not like Obama is the only one with big name celebs lining up to offer support, usually in the form of money and publicity, which inevitably generates more money, which may or may not win someone the White House. Rudy Giuliani has the support of some 1970s pinup girls in the form of Bo Derek and Cheryl Ladd. No word on whether the rest of the angels view him as a perfect 10 or not.
But other than the possibility that celebrities will bring in more people to hear a particular candidate's message, does an endorsement by certain celebrities carry any weight with the voting public? Are you more likely to vote for Bill Richardson because he's got the support of Jodie Foster and Bette Midler, or for John Edwards because he's got Bonnie Raitt and Madeline Stowe in his corner?
What about the reverse? Do endorsements by certainly celebrities actually do more harm than good? Is Mitt Romney scary enough on his own, or is it made worse knowing he has Donnie and Marie Osmond going to bat for him? Yes, I grew up watching them sing and dance with C3PO and R2-D2. Yes, I adored them as a child. I'm older now. I've outgrown Donnie and Marie. (Thankfully, the same cannot be said of my Star Wars fascination.) Is Dennis Kucinich trailing in the polls because he has only been able to attract what some would refer to as "minor" celebrities like Ani DiFranco? (Maybe if Melissa and Tammy Lynn both officially jumped on his bandwagon, they could help him sneak up on the front-runners.)
Hillary Clinton didn't come out on top in Iowa, but she's still considered the leader of the pack in many circles. Does her celebrity posse have anything to do with that? Maya Angelou, Barbara Streisand, Carly Simon and Billie Jean King are all rooting for another Clinton presidency.
So is it the quantity or the percieved quality of the celebrities that carries weight in political circles? For example, I would put more stock in the opinion of Maya Angelou than Marie Osmond, based on my perception of their intellects. I know neither of these people. Marie Osmond could be a rocket scientist in her spare time and have secret knowledge of the inner workings of goverment at the highest levels. But based on my perceptions, I would trust the opinion of Maya Angelou over Osmond's any day of the week. Doesn't make Marie's opinion any less valid, just not one I care to explore. Which brings me to another side of this. What makes the opinion of a celebrity so darned important? If Brittney Spears suddenly regained her sanity long enough to publicly support one candidate or another, would anyone actually care? Yet, if it were to happen, her endorsement of a particular candidate would certainly make the news somewhere, much to the dismay of the unfortunate candidate. The opinion of a celebrity is no more or less important than that of anyone else, really. It's just that the rest of us don't tend to travel with an entourage. It's hard sometimes to hear actual discourse above the celebrity chatter. Thankfully, it turns out most folk make their voting decisions with the help of trusted family and friends rather than any celebrity. The Pew Research Center did a little poll to try to find out just what all this celebrity stumping was worth. The answer? Not a whole heck of a lot. What do you think? Do you pay attention to your favorite celebrities' statements when it comes to political candidates? Does an endorsement from a celebrity have any impact on how you cast your vote? What about those of you who live outside the confines of the good ol' U.S. of A. — does celebrity play a role in your brand of politics? Submitted by on January 7, 2008 - 12:34pm. |
Recent blog posts
New forum topicsActive TopicsNew Comments
|






I'll say this much. . .
I've been an Obama supporter from day 1, and I'm not a huge fan of Oprah's or Halle Berry's. If I were to pick my candidate based on celebrity support, I'd be pulling for Clinton or Richardson, apparently!
Actually, for me, the reverse tends to apply. I tend to lose respect for celebrities who express their support for candidates that I don't like, rather than gaining respect for candidates because they're supported by celebrities I like.
politics in austria
I have to say that two things are very different in austria: celebrities and politics. in austria, you never vote for one person, but always for a political partie. plus, we have two "larger" parties (about 30-40 % of the votes) and two/three smaller one (4-15 %). celebrities who have a lot of impact don't really exist in austria, of course celebrities exist but it's still very different.
I think it's very interesting to see who supports which candidate, but I think that wouldn't influence me much. although I have to say that I didn't know anything about dennis kucinich untill I read about him on tammy's blog.
"Normal is not something to aspire to, it's something to get away from." ~ Jodie Foster
i'll admit
the whole "endorsement" thing just feels like more babbling 'advertising (just slightly less annoying than animated flash banner ads saying that i won something because i'm the 29874762 visitor)
but it still makes sense. by getting an endorsement, you have someone, in the public eye, say "i like this person because of ____" now while we may consciously be thinking "yea.. whatever.. they're just reading from a script"... subconsciously we are still absorbing that person's name and maybe some random "facts" about that candidate. and the more and more we hear about *product A* .. we are going to think about *product A* ... and that's the main goal. just like education. we learn by repeating, hearing things over and over again, and habit. so that's why i think it's not really the *people* that are endorsing a candidate that helps.. but how *MANY* people are endorsing a candidate that really matters. more headlines. more mention of *candidate A*. more repetition... better chance of a person remembering *candidate A* when they get behind that little curtain in that portable voting booth.
This is off topic, but we
just to clarify
you're right with kids and learning. my partner is a university teacher of future teachers.. my mom has been a teacher her whole life.
but we also learn from repetition. why do we know the words of the songs on the radio? even if we don't actually "sing along" with them? we hear them all the time. repetition isn't the only way we learn. but it is a way we learn. we pick up things and remember things that we hear over and over again. it may not be a very long-term learning, but it is a way to "cram and puke" (remember college testing like that? yea. i had some classes that were a 'eat and puke' type learning. and i don't remember a dang thing from those classes. but i did well in the classes.) short term learning. that's all that is needed in election-sense. they need to make sure we remember their name just long enough to put it down on our ballot.
Celebrity endorsements are
Celebrity endorsements are meant to lure in the people who don't have a clue who the canidates are let alone where they stand politically. Okay, so maybe they know if they are a Democrat or a Republican. Celebrity endorsments certainly didn't help John Kerry during the last election did it? If a celebrity does endorse a canidate for president or government office it doesn't mean I lose respect for them because they may want someone I don't care for to win. I don't agree with most politicians anyways, they are probably the best actors on the planet. Most of these yahoos should be winning an Academy Award in February.
A lot of the reasons that the politicians are pulling for celebrity endorsements is because voting numbers have drastically decreased. In my opinion we should shake it up to lack luster canidates and a pathetic rein of democracy. I haven't really decided yet who I'm voting for, but I know what I'm looking for in a President...by the way, Bush ain't it! Romney almost scares me more than Bush in terms of his Conservative view points. The Osmond's can sing and praise their hearts delight, I'll drop dead before I vote for him. Oh I'm avoiding my political rant >_<.
"Normal is not something to aspire to, it's something to get away from."
Jodie Foster supports Bill
Jodie Foster supports Bill Richardson...wow. That's certainly the most surprising, as he's the same guy who believes homosexuality is a choice...not to mention the fact that he's a bit racist.
I'm tired of celebrities throwing their weight around like that, especially ones who know that they're throwing their weight around...*cough* Oprah *cough*
---
“In a letter to Dear Abby a reader complained that a gay couple was moving in across the street and wanted to know what he could do to improve the quality of the neighborhood. Her suggestion - 'You could move.'”
Jodie also supports
Straight Talk
Celebrity endorsements and negative ads--the two areas of campaigns that voters swear they hate, but when push comes to shove, there's proof that, if done correctly, both matter a great deal.
When people think of celebrity endorsements, they think of the Barbara Streisands and Oprah Winfreys of the world...really, those types of endorsements only get people in the door and help you raise money...they don't change anyone's mind.
But what can get you some votes is finding the hometown hero...the smalltown girl or guy that managed to make good. Everyone remembers him or her before they made it big and while lamenting at how terrible Hollywood is, they'll thank their lucky stars that their hometown hero remembers his small town values.
Brandon Routh's endorsement of Barack Obama isn't going to carry much sway across the country, but if you put him in Norwalk, Iowa, where he grew up, you're going to win some votes.
People don't vote for a
celeb politics
I agree with Peachblossm.
A celebrity is just another person. He/She likes who they like just as random John/Jane Doe likes who they like and it counts for just as much. The fact that the're a celebrity is the only reason why attention is called to their support . People make their own decisons.
Hmm
I don't mean to sound harsh or anything, but anyone whose opinion on a political candidate is swayed by what some Hollywood star says is probably brain damaged in some capacity.
__________________
"The world will not greet you with open arms, but with a clenched fist."
I think it depends on who it
Last I heard, they are people too...
I think we have to remember that these so-called "celebrities" are just like the rest of us who have opinions and support for different things. The difference is, by voicing that opinion, or showing their support, its taken very seriously by other people(celebrities, and non-celebrities alike).
If I said the same thing, or stood behind my candidate, noone would even blink an eye. Its just the way life goes. Whether their choices are good or not, they should be able to stand for what they believe in. If the rest of us want to use that as the reason for giving the object of the attention another look, or as the reason to walk away, then thats on us - we're free adults after all!!
In New Zealand
"I have no idea who I will vote for come November"
Voting
I would like to believe people make up their own mind, and vote based on a well thought out decisions.
Unfortunately, a lot of people don't put all that much thought into their voting behaviour. For some, who they vote for could be as simple as whoever Oprah said she liked.
You cannot really compare European politics to that of the US. Different system, way less money involved, no celebs. Well, maybe one or two.
Wow, Abraham Lincoln was the
Money? Yes please ...
Having a celebrity in one's camp means two things:
1) Money
2) familiarization
But really, money is the most helpful factor to candidates. Having an Oprah means more bang for one's buck. literally. although I'm also sure that Oprah's bookclub members have/are taking a long good look at Barack Obama.
The familiarization factor just helps the average lazy voter, who only knows whether a candidate is Republican or Democrat, and is fuzzy on the rest. I'm sure if Shia LaBeouf were to declare his love for a candidate, lazy 18 yr. old (heterosexual) girls, with otherwise no inclination toward voting, would perk up if only for a moment. And if that moment happens to be voting day, so much the better for the candidate. And perhaps the same could be said for the lazy 18 yrs old homosexual, Ani diFranco loving girls. We are, after all, a society (or cult) of celebrities ...
Now and then we had a hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be pirates. [Mark Twain]
My asian powers pwn chuck....
Firstly many people have this mistaken idea that what some public figure's opinion on a presidential canidate matters to them- it doesn't. Because as far as presidency is concerned, i'm a believer that everyone form their own opinions on canidates not follow some other person's , even a celebrity, idea.
Second... hahaha chuck noris - there isn't a chin behind his beard just another fist! Well... as we saw in that Bruce Lee film- Chuck Norris has one weakness and its asians... so white man this little asian girl is immune to your powers !