by scribegrrrlNavigation |
"Nip/Tuck": Sharon Gless succumbs to the sexismHave you been watching Nip/Tuck, even though Portia de Rossi has been AWOL for so long? I have, and I haven't been able to stop thinking about the recent psycho stalker story line, with special guest star Sharon Gless. [Warning: Spoilers]
When Gless first showed up on the show, I was thrilled. Her character, Colleen Rose, was sassy, smart and funny — just like I like Gless, and like I'm used to seeing her. But things soon took a turn for the criminally insane. We learned that Colleen wasn't really a talent agent; she was just trying to get close to Dr. Sean. And when an actual agent interfered, teddy-bear-collecting Colleen decided to stuff him. It was one of the most gruesome murder scenes — not to mention one of the trippiest — I've ever seen on TV. Last week, it looked like Colleen met an untimely death at her own hands. I'm not sure whether she'll be back for one last gasp tonight, or will even be mentioned again. But I do know one thing: I don't understand why Gless took the role. (I'm not the only one.) I guess maybe she thought it would be fun to play crazy. But the story line was just plain misogynist — Colleen the capable professional soon became Colleen the desperate, menopausal, lonely, diabolical crone. It seems very far beneath Gless.
I might be overreacting. But most of the women on Nip/Tuck are appallingly two-dimensional, and not just because they're vain moneyed types seeking plastic surgery. Creator Ryan Murphy (who is gay, not that that means anything at all in terms of his attitude toward women) seems to want to destroy his female characters and erase their humanity. Whether it's Kimber (or Eden) the slut — don't even get me started on their violent sex scene last week — or Colleen the psycho or Julia the meat-seeking rag doll or Liz the barely there prudish lesbian or Kate the fat actress, they're easy to sum up and difficult to care about.
It's not just that they're stereotypes: They're receptacles for all the easy, knee-jerk, hateful responses men have to women who don't need them or have some kind of power over them. It's getting to be downright disgusting. (Oddly enough, Rosie O'Donnell actually fared pretty well in her recent apperances as Dawn Budge, the blowsy lottery winner. I even liked her.) So I'm sorry Gless took the role. But at least she wasn't as scary as Joan Van Ark in last week's episode — that was beyond freaky.
Why am I still watching? I honestly don't know. Probably because in its first couple of seasons, Nip/Tuck seemed to show the humanity in even the most vile of characters. But now it just goes right for the slime, without suggesting we'll ever evolve up onto the land. Again, Dawn Budge was an exception — she seemed to have a heart underneath all that yelling. But that may have more to do with Rosie than the writing or directing. I think I finally have a response to "Tell me what you don't like about yourself": The fact that I watch Nip/Tuck. Luckily, I don't have to fork over hundreds of thousands to correct that particular flaw. Submitted by on February 12, 2008 - 4:32pm. |
User login
AfterEllen.com NYC Meet-Up on May 18thWe're having a get-together on May 18th in NYC for our readers, with some of our staff and vloggers, and the cast/creators of 3Way. Go here for details. Recent blog posts
Recent comments
|






FINALLY!
I have long been confused about women, especially lesbian women, loving this show. It is the single most misogynistic piece of crap ever to televised. Ryan Murphy is the gay male equivalent of the man hating dyke: a woman hating fag. I'd like to believe that Sharon was just happy to work after QAF went off the air, but she's got a stead gig on Burn Notice. (or maybe that didn't get renewed.)
Lisa
Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security -- B. FranklinI'm not sure misogyny is
I'm not sure misogyny is the right word here - the men fare no better than women on that show. The writers just seem extremely attached to the whole "women are insane, men are scum" world-view. It used to feel like particularly subversive social commentary (still does sometimes), but lately it just seems like a cheap way to generate their particular brand of turgid, distasteful melodrama.
Which, you know, fine if that's your type of thing, but it gets boring very quickly.
I feel like NIP/TUCK is
I feel like NIP/TUCK is such a sneaky and intelligent social commentary on the major social trends and infatuations we see in the world, one of which, of course, is the fascination with body image and how we look and it is mostly women caught in the prison of body obsession so...clearly the show doesn't leave men unscathed as most men on the show have these truly unattractive qualities.
The world of NIP/TUCK is so evil and so negative and depressing that if you pay attention to what's really being said, it's actually dead on the money. It's entertaining for sure, but it's a very insightful show for a more critical viewer. I definitely wouldn't agree that the show is promoting this superficial mentality as the majority of these characters are so screwed up that no one I know would envy them. Everyone on the show is unhappy or traumatized in some way. They never promote the idea that having these surgeries is going to actually fix the real problem. In fact, it tends to make things worse for the characters and it usually has some sort of complication or emptiness that follows.
Really?
It's entertaining for sure, but it's a very insightful show for a more critical viewer.
Explain to me what you mean by "critical viewer", please. Because I wouldn't want to take offense, where none was intended.
Lisa
Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security -- B. FranklinI definitely did not mean
I definitely did not mean to offend or be judgmental. I guess, to explain what I meant by that is that for those who are watching and taking what happens at face value, the show has the potential to be very negative...anyone who watches with the intention of valuing the plastic culture that we see all around us or who would jump to the conclusion that the writer is a misogynist, which is a heavy accusation, without trying to really understand what the overall message is. Then again, it's possible that I am giving the show more credit than it actually deserves.
It's like a friend of mine who encouraged me to listen to comedians without laughing, to pay attention to what they're really saying and you realize oftentimes that it's simply not that funny anymore while it's also just as easy, much easier in fact, to not listen as closely and laugh the whole time.
Not much better ...
if you're saying that I "jump" to conclusions, and can't see what the "overall message" is. As I'm sure Ryan's only "overall message" is "put money in my pocket", I'm also sure that you've give him and the show more credit than it actually deserves.
Lisa
Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security -- B. FranklinI used to watch N/T from
I used to watch N/T from the beginning but I haven't been able to watch the last or the current season. Until then N/T has been a great show imo, and I also think it has been a show that even though it looked superficial was deeply critical. of pretty much everything and everyone. both men and women are deeply flawed, even though the men on the show are much more powerful (but then the centre of the show is on these two men ...). Of all the patients getting surgery for their outer flaws to cure their inner problems - it pretty much always end badly. only those who get the surgery after being injured (the pro bono cases e.g.) are happier afterwards.
of course I am a bit disappointed that the female characters usually turn out to be psychos, but so do the male ones. I would not consider N/T a misagonistic show (as mentioned above).
Just added this to my DON'T WATCH list!
I love Sharon Gless----always have. She was my first celebrity autograph from back in the Cagney and Lacey days. I wrote her a fan letter and she sent me a sexy black and white glossy of her in a bathrobe that was opened nicely at the top. (Hmmmm....I said outloud as I hung the portrait over my trundle bed....maybe I like girls better than boys....)
However, this sounds like a show that would piss me off and I'd rather remember Sharon back when she hung out with her partner.
--Mari
Mari SanGiovanni
Author of: Greetings From Jamaica, Wish You Were Queer...
www.GreetingsFromJamaica.com
soooo disappointed
i have been a devoted fan of the show since it started (i even own all the seasons on dvd). and i was so excited when i got my girlfriend hooked on it with them over the summer, so that she would be able to follow along with me as we watched this season. well...all that's out the window now. she gave up two episodes or so in, and just last week i decided i dont really think it's worth watching anymore.
mysoginy and all other political issues aside (which i rather liked being include in the show, to a point, as it gave me even more topics of discussion in regards to it), it seems like they're trying SO hard to be shocking and interesting this season. frankly, it's too over-the-top, and ironically enough, falls short of the top-notch entertainment that got me interested in the first place.
so even though my girlfriend says i'm crazy, i'll probably just settle for buying the season on dvd sometime in the future (cause at some point, i'd like to see how it all went down) and say goodbye to my weekly show for good. damn.
I used to watch.
I think it's an interesting role choice
I think it's pretty interesting that Sharon Gless, who was once famously targeted by a stalker, has taken on the role of stalker herself.
I don't think Ryan Murphy is a misogynist at all. Very far from it in fact. His show is consistently populated with fantastic female guest stars of all ages who are given meaty roles with great dialogue.
If you don't like sensationalism or black humor, fine. But to accuse Murphy of misogyny is really heavy-handed.
I don't think Ryan Murphy
I don't think Ryan Murphy is a misogynist at all. Very far from it in fact. His show is consistently populated with fantastic female guest stars of all ages who are given meaty roles with great dialogue.
And then he turns them psycho, or has them attacked by an eagle, or has 'em shit in a hot tub, or gets thrown off a roof mid-orgasm, or has their kidney stolen by a lover, or gets cut up by "the carver", or gets kidnapped and forced to strip and perform for the kidnapper, or just generally royally screwed over by a man. Yeah, great dialogue. ::insert rolling eyes here::
But to accuse Murphy of misogyny is really heavy-handed.
Yeah, the truth hurts sometimes.
I found it beyond sad that women not only don't recognize this for what it is, but they will defend it. We are so used to being spat on, shit on, screwed and screwed over, that we don't even see it when it's happening. Tragic.
Lisa
Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security -- B. Franklinmisogyny
You're confused
It sounds like you're confusing the actors and their characters, fiction and reality. Ryan does not take the actors and "turn them psycho." The characters may become psycho. But simply because a woman in fiction comes to a bad end doesn't make the fiction a misogynist tale.
But simply because a
But simply because a woman in fiction comes to a bad end doesn't make the fiction a misogynist tale.
And if it were "A" woman, that would be true, but when it is every single woman character to appear on that show ... well, if it walks like a duck, a quacks like a duck....
Lisa
Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security -- B. Franklinthe men vs. the women
And I didn't even have sympathy for her character; there wasn't enough humanity left to feel sorry for. I just felt kind of cheated.
I don't know. The thing is, I do love "dark" stuff. And I used to love Nip/Tuck. Kimber, for example, was fascinating and had her own kind of power. But now she's giving up and falling apart. Lately the show just seems so brutal to women.
I think Carnivale got the mix right -- it was dark but never took the easy route to it. I know that's a totally different kind of show, though.
I almost agree with you.
Before this season, Sean and Christian did have power. But this season, they no longer do and they are aware of it. They try to act as if they do...but they are really just desperate and sad.
Maybe that is the point...to show that while they were the big fish in the pond in Miami, not so much now they are in Hollywood.
And while I am sure the show can be analyzed and find some good come out of it...like the actresses they hire for guest-starring roles...all I can do is to repeat myself and say, the way it is written...I simply no longer care about the characters on the show. It seems to me that the regular characters have been changed and sacrificed to further plots (I hate what they have done to Kimber)...and changes like that will always lose me as a viewer.
Brad Falchuck
I feel the same way about
I feel the same way about nip/tuck as you do, Scribegrrl. I've watched (and enjoyed) ut through it's ups and downs during four seasons, and this season started out really promising as well, whatwith Portia de Rossi playing an out lesbian, and more of Dawn Budge!!
Then came a series of unnecessary deaths. Ginas fall, and I was disgusted when Colleen Rose murdered that competing agent, No more nip/tuck for me, I think the series have done all there is left to do and they might as well kill of Matt, Sean and Christian and be done with it.
I used to love Sharon Gless
Sharon Gless was my #1 back in her Cagney & Lacey days. I know she's struggled with alcohol and her weight over the years, but damn!! The last few roles I've seen her in, she looks like a female Harry Potter.
When I ever scrolled down and saw the Skeletor photo of Joan Van Ark I fell out of my chair and immediately took to the fetal position. WTF?
I've never watched Nip/Tuck and it seems like a nighttime version of the equally lame daytime soap opera Passions.