![]() by scribegrrrlNavigation |
Academy to Whoopi: Sorry we, like, totally forgot about youI'll admit that I didn't pay close attention to the Oscars telecast this year. I just wasn't that excited about the nominees, and there wasn't even much star-gazing to do — where was Jodie Foster, anyway? So I didn't even see the montage of the hosts of Oscars past. And that means I didn't notice that Whoopi Goldberg was completely left out of said montage.
Whoopi wasn't the only one who slipped Oscar's mind — Steve Martin was also left out of the host montage, and Brad Renfro and Roy Scheider were not included in the "In Memoriam" segment. There was some footage (in a different montage) of Whoopi's 1990 win for Best Supporting Actress for Ghost. But there wasn't a second of praise for her four hosting gigs (yes, four! 1993, 1995, 1998, 2001). The slight did not please the ladies of The View. Whoopi even got a little teary-eyed — here's the clip: The Academy has apologized. According to producer Gil Cates, the omission was a "complete oversight":
Cates also said the montage wasn't really a "montage of hosts" but a montage of exciting moments. Oh. Gee, that helps: It's not about you being a host, Whoopi; it's about you being not exciting. I don't know. It's hard not to see it as deliberate. Whoopi's performances as host were widely criticized by some, so this just seems like a kind of revenge. (I myself quite enjoyed her as host — I remember that after the performance of the Pocahontas song "Colors of the Wind," she mused, "What color is my wind?" and I was chuckling for days.)
And then there's this: Producer Cates noted that he was the one of the honchos who asked Whoopi to host the show in the first place. Is that sort of like saying, "Some of my best friends are black Oscar hosts?" I'm sure it's not fair of me to say that, but it just seems like he's protesting a little too much. If it wasn't deliberate, it sure was sloppy. Hire some new researchers, ABC! Submitted by on February 27, 2008 - 11:17am. |
User login
Recent blog posts
Recent comments
|






I was glad to see an apology...
but I noticed that it was all passive. "No harm was intended..." "...she was left out." How about someone apologizing for what he (or whomever was responsible) actually did, instead of just expressing regret for "what happened."
The other Oscar moment I'd still like to see explained is why Best Actress was buried in middle while Best Actor was grouped with Best Director and Best Picture at the end.
didn't notice it either!
now I feel bad... I love Whoopi, and the Oscars when she hosted it... but I didn't notice she was missing from the montage until now!
I don't think it was on purpose, maybe they were just careless and rushed through getting all those montages done. (some useless, like that binoculars one!) I think I want to believe that's what happened!
Whoopi's ego
Let's not even have Oscars. Let's just have the Whoopi adulation show. She was in the supporting actress clip. She does not need to be in every clip. Her whining disgusts me. Another bit of ego carressing for poor little Whoopi. Of course, I may still be miffed at her for making Elizabeth Hasselback look smarter (and one thing I don't need to see is someone making the Elizabeth Hasselback look smarter).*
Roy Scheider died in February of 2008 which means the two time Oscar nominee will be in next year's memoriam (since the Memoriam clip goes from February of the previous year to January 31st of the year of the presentation). Pretty much has always been this way. As for Brad Renfro, that is hardly a career that is worthy of consideration. Could they have done with less agents. I don't know, it kind of matters on their importance. Renfro was a minor, minor actor whose career is hardly indicative of being selected. It's intriguing that film buffs are ticked that the great director Edward Yang was left off (now that's really wrong) while E is worried about Brad Renfro. Tragic yes. Lasting impact in much of any way - not really.
*A few weeks ago Hasselback said black men got the right to vote in Presidential elections before women did. Whoopi, so sure of herself because she's Whoopi, corrected Hasselback. Only problem is that black men got the right to vote a half century earlier than women. Needless to say I have to put up with conservative relatives sending me that clip. Geez.
Of course, as Whoopi stated,
Whoopi wasn't whining.
Sorry but no
It's HasselbEck, not HasselbAck
Elisabeth Hasselbeck. Not Elizabeth Hasselback.
Spelling also makes people look smarter/dumber.
See how easy it is to make a mistake? Maybe Whoopi just made a mistake. The Academy certainly did.
Whoopi did clarify what she
My Lover Cindy, Are
My Lover Cindy,
Are you actually comparing misspelling a c grade celebrity's last name to not having a fundamental knowledge of American history. Really. Come on now.
So I take it that if I spell Adrian Zmed's last name incorrectly that would be the equivalent of not knowing Abraham Lincoln was the President during The Civil War. I guess so by your reckoning.
The real problem with Whoopi not knowing her history is that she decided to correct someone who in this case did.
ediana
I don't mean to be
thanks mods!