News, Reviews & Commentary on Lesbian and Bisexual women in Entertainment and the Media

Miley Cyrus: What a fake!

OK, I'm not the sharpest pencil in the backpack, so maybe that's why I don't get what the fuss is over this news of deception perpetrated by Miley Cyrus, the 15-year-old star of Disney Channel's Hannah Montana. I mean, I wanted to be outraged and self-righteous when I heard and read the media buzz about another entitled child star doing something unsavory. But after learning what the crime was, I couldn't even muster a disapproving frown or a finger-wagging!

If you haven't heard by now, Cyrus, while performing on stage as her alter ego Hannah Montana, was captured on video by a fan. The video shows Cyrus being whisked offstage while a stand-in skips and dances and prances around onstage to give Cyrus additional time to change from the character into her real self. Of course, my first thought was, "Hold up! Isn't it illegal to videotape a concert? Arrest that fan!" Anyway, Cyrus' representatives quickly confirmed that yes, a "production element" is incorporated into the show to facilitate a quicker costume change. Here's the apparent offense:



OK, that was, what, seconds? A minute at most? During the droning, repeated chorus portion of a song? Is that so bad? Isn't her entire rise to fame built on the double identity of Hannah Montana versus Miley Cyrus, and switching around and trying not to be caught as one or the other? I wonder if those who are outraged get annoyed when they learn that magicians don't really saw women in half on stage.

Hannah Montana is a Disney character. And I want to think that there aren't too many folks over the age of 12 who believe that the same person is under that Mickey Mouse costume in Disneyland, Disney World, Paris Disney and Hong Kong Disneyland all day, every day, in all four places. I know it's not quite the same thing, but I don't know, maybe the irate fan(s) were just disappointed that they saw how the "magic" is created. Maybe they're just sad, sort of like accidentally walking through the characters' gate at Disneyland and seeing Donald Duck with his head off, soaking his feet, while smoking a cigarette. I understand being disappointed, because we all want to live the fantasy. But since Hannah Montana is a fictional character, does it matter that Hannah Montana was "played" by another for a few minutes so that an actual person could get herself together to perform? If Miley had a stand-in double for herself, then that would be some interesting psychological grist to grind in discussion. Heh.

I know that people are attending with the expectation of seeing both Miley and Hannah Montana, but ... it's the same person. When one person performs two parts in a staged production, the laws of physics guarantees that the person can't be both people in the same place at the same time. My math and science grades kept me from attending Cal Tech, but I think I remember the equation like this: two roles ≥ same place ÷ one person + same time = ain't possible. Could it all have been orchestrated differently? Probably. But it just doesn't seem that awful. They were obviously trying to make the transition from one to the other quickly enough to get a "wow, how'd they do that" from the audience.

This concert tour has made headlines from the time it was announced. There were issues with ticket distribution, as well as problems with brokers and individual scalpers buying up tickets and then selling them for hundreds of dollars over face value. In some cities, seats were up to a thousand dollars. As you can imagine, the majority of Hannah Montana's most loyal fans are little kids, and the inflated prices exceeded what most parents could pay. Then just a few weeks ago in a ticket giveaway promotion, it was discovered that a woman wrote a letter on her 6-year-old daughter's behalf, saying that the girl's father was killed in Iraq — and it was all in hopes of garnering sympathy and some killer tickets! It was a lie. Now that is an example of an egregious deception and setting a pretty awful example for kids. Not theatrical sleight of hand that allows for a costume change.

Of course, I would be very upset if I bought tickets to hear Barbra Streisand sing her greatest hits, only to have her disappear off stage for a costume change while Roseanne Barr finished up Don't Rain on My Parade wearing a Streisand wig and sequined gown. But is that what is taking place on stage in Cyrus' tour? I say no, not even close.

  • roc's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • deathbyblonde's picture

    Ugh

    Miley Cyrus... *sigh* Yet another creepy Disney-product.  When I babysit and see these shows, it always seems like the kids on them can't just be another kid actor, they have to be a brand; they act in the show, they all do these weird music videos, they guest star on other Disney shows, they have products made about them, they do musical tours, etc.  It really skeezes me out.  That was kind of off-topic, but yeah, that's all I have to say about Miley Cyrus.
    MsWoo's picture

    Shrug

    When you go to a show like this (or rather are dragged to it by your 6-8 yr old daughter) you expect to get a lot of icing with your cake. Streisand aside, I think this is par for the course in today's entertainment world. And for the few moments a double appears, I think it a small infraction.

     

    Miley is no Cher. But even Cher now uses doubles to illustrate the changes her personna has undergone over the years.

    egret's picture

    Miley Cyrus

    I've felt bad for this kid ever since this concert tour started off. Yes, she is a Disney product, and the child of a well-known country singer, but she's still a 15 year-old who has seen an incredible amount of base behavior by adults focusing on her and her career.  Luckily for her and her future adulthood, it doesn't seem to be promoted or endorsed by her parents (Britney, Jamie, etc.).  I don't understand this need to destroy what has been idealized.
    deathbyblonde's picture

    Oh

    I wasn't trying to bash Miley Cyrus (I''m pretty indifferent to her), I was talking about Disney and their creepy need to turn barely-pubescent kids into products.  As for this whole "scandle": meh.
    egret's picture

    Sorry

    Sorry - I didn't think you were getting at her herself, but I still think people forget she's a kid because of all the Disneyfication. You're right, that part is creepy, and I think the largest part of why people fixate on her so unhealthily.
    Slym's picture

    Uhhhh

    What?????? Maybe I'm too old or something, but what's the fuss about?
    Bomi's picture

    omg this is absolutely....wait what was the question?

    Wow! What a horrendous crime! Your trying to tell me that people in Hollywood put on shows?! NO i refuse to believe that everything i'm spoon feed in the media is not 100% accurate and true 100% of the time. This is a travesty to my human experience!!!

     

    seriously... why should i be surprised by the level of insanity in people.. and yet i am.

    radioactivegirl's picture

    As usual

    The general public and the media love to over react. It does my head in. A meaningless distraction from more important matters.

    7OF9's picture

    Nice...

    "...two roles ≥ same place ÷ one person + same time = ain't possible."

    Very funny :)

    jamlawgirl's picture

    The better question is "Why

    The better question is "Why is there a story about this on AfterEllen???"

    Just becasue there was some faux lesbian rumor about her does not mean she is worthy of coverage. Agh! I always try my best to ignore the latest teeny bopper craze but somehow it always seems to find me! Agh!

     

    StacksOfBother's picture

    Seriously

    I was JUST thinking that to myself as I skimmed over this. I mean, Hannah Montana is marketed to what age group? 10 years old, maybe 13? I could be wrong, but it would make sense to me that most reader here are well over that age.

    I'm not really sure why I should be caring about this article at all. I thought AfterEllen was about "News, Reviews & Commentary on Lesbian and Bisexual women in Entertainment and the Media", so how does this apply? Maybe I missed something....
    roc's picture

    .......

    Obviously not all blogs or blog topics are of interest to every member of the site. There are thousands of members. But hopefully there are enough topics posted during the day, the week, the month that everyone can find something interesting to them. Hopefully...
    MsWoo's picture

    Well Said

    The point of blogs here has always been that they can take the discussion a step further. Sometimes this means delving deeper into the theme of the site, and sometimes it is just a reflection of the blogger's state of mind or interests at the time.

     

    Just because Miley Cyrus is a teen (and likely straight) commodity, does not mean that lesbians cannot be interested in her. If that were the case that we could ONLY discuss straight and bi women, the AE Top 100 list would be a HELL of a lot shorter.

     

    I, for one, would hate to see a ban of discussion on Tina Fey (as would most of AE, I am sure) merely because she is not deemed "lesbian enough" to be a topic of discussion.

     

    Also, keep in mind, AE does have younger readers. So if the younger crowd wants to imagine what life would be like if Miley were a bit more "dykadelic", where is the harm?

    alex_m's picture

    actually,

    you can split Miley Cyrus/ Hannah Montana in several pieces and reassemble those pieces in a different ways so you get two identical copies of Cyrus/Montana.

    This is also known as the "Banach–Tarski paradox"

    roc's picture

    ........

    Heh :)
    scribegrrrl's picture

    here on the blog, anything goes

    Although it's true that AfterEllen.com focuses on "News, Reviews & Commentary on Lesbian and Bisexual Women in Entertainment and the Media," here on the blog we offer "News, Reviews & Commentary on Women in Entertainment and the Media" — just women generally. The women discussed on the blog are not necessarily lesbian or bi (and shouldn't be assumed to be lesbian or bi, no matter how good they are at billiards!).

    The idea is that we are giving you our perspective on the world of entertainment generally. The bloggers are all gay or bisexual, and we hope we offer a view that the mainstream media doesn't always offer. And yet we still cover mainstream stories sometimes (as well as less popular stuff). Essentially, it's a lesbian/bi "take" on pop culture in general.

    In short, anything goes, and we just write about whatever piques our interest — and we hope sometimes it will pique yours too. :)
    MsWoo's picture

    Damn!

    I need not have commented. scribegrrrl sums it up perfectly. Thank you. You are dead on.

    User login

    Recent comments

    After Ellen home page on logo online