by ccpuffNavigation |
Miley Cyrus: What a fake!OK, I'm not the sharpest pencil in the backpack, so maybe that's why I don't get what the fuss is over this news of deception perpetrated by Miley Cyrus, the 15-year-old star of Disney Channel's Hannah Montana. I mean, I wanted to be outraged and self-righteous when I heard and read the media buzz about another entitled child star doing something unsavory. But after learning what the crime was, I couldn't even muster a disapproving frown or a finger-wagging!
If you haven't heard by now, Cyrus, while performing on stage as her alter ego Hannah Montana, was captured on video by a fan. The video shows Cyrus being whisked offstage while a stand-in skips and dances and prances around onstage to give Cyrus additional time to change from the character into her real self. Of course, my first thought was, "Hold up! Isn't it illegal to videotape a concert? Arrest that fan!" Anyway, Cyrus' representatives quickly confirmed that yes, a "production element" is incorporated into the show to facilitate a quicker costume change. Here's the apparent offense: OK, that was, what, seconds? A minute
at most? During the droning, repeated chorus portion of a song? Is that
so bad? Isn't her entire rise to fame built on the double identity of
Hannah Montana versus Miley Cyrus, and switching around and trying not
to be caught as one or the other? I wonder if those who are outraged
get annoyed when they learn that magicians don't really saw women in
half on stage. Hannah Montana is a Disney character. And I want to think that there aren't too many folks over the age of 12 who believe that the same person is under that Mickey Mouse costume in Disneyland, Disney World, Paris Disney and Hong Kong Disneyland all day, every day, in all four places. I know it's not quite the same thing, but I don't know, maybe the irate fan(s) were just disappointed that they saw how the "magic" is created. Maybe they're just sad, sort of like accidentally walking through the characters' gate at Disneyland and seeing Donald Duck with his head off, soaking his feet, while smoking a cigarette. I understand being disappointed, because we all want to live the fantasy. But since Hannah Montana is a fictional character, does it matter that Hannah Montana was "played" by another for a few minutes so that an actual person could get herself together to perform? If Miley had a stand-in double for herself, then that would be some interesting psychological grist to grind in discussion. Heh.
I know that people are attending with the expectation of seeing both Miley and Hannah Montana, but ... it's the same person. When one person performs two parts in a staged production, the laws of physics guarantees that the person can't be both people in the same place at the same time. My math and science grades kept me from attending Cal Tech, but I think I remember the equation like this: two roles ≥ same place ÷ one person + same time = ain't possible. Could it all have been orchestrated differently? Probably. But it just doesn't seem that awful. They were obviously trying to make the transition from one to the other quickly enough to get a "wow, how'd they do that" from the audience. This concert tour has made headlines from the time it was announced. There were issues with ticket distribution, as well as problems with brokers and individual scalpers buying up tickets and then selling them for hundreds of dollars over face value. In some cities, seats were up to a thousand dollars. As you can imagine, the majority of Hannah Montana's most loyal fans are little kids, and the inflated prices exceeded what most parents could pay. Then just a few weeks ago in a ticket giveaway promotion, it was discovered that a woman wrote a letter on her 6-year-old daughter's behalf, saying that the girl's father was killed in Iraq — and it was all in hopes of garnering sympathy and some killer tickets! It was a lie. Now that is an example of an egregious deception and setting a pretty awful example for kids. Not theatrical sleight of hand that allows for a costume change.
Of course, I would be very upset if I bought tickets to hear Barbra Streisand sing her greatest hits, only to have her disappear off stage for a costume change while Roseanne Barr finished up Don't Rain on My Parade wearing a Streisand wig and sequined gown. But is that what is taking place on stage in Cyrus' tour? I say no, not even close. Submitted by on January 16, 2008 - 5:08pm. |
User login
Recent blog posts
Recent comments
|





Ugh
Shrug
When you go to a show like this (or rather are dragged to it by your 6-8 yr old daughter) you expect to get a lot of icing with your cake. Streisand aside, I think this is par for the course in today's entertainment world. And for the few moments a double appears, I think it a small infraction.
Miley is no Cher. But even Cher now uses doubles to illustrate the changes her personna has undergone over the years.
Miley Cyrus
Oh
Sorry
Uhhhh
omg this is absolutely....wait what was the question?
Wow! What a horrendous crime! Your trying to tell me that people in Hollywood put on shows?! NO i refuse to believe that everything i'm spoon feed in the media is not 100% accurate and true 100% of the time. This is a travesty to my human experience!!!
seriously... why should i be surprised by the level of insanity in people.. and yet i am.
As usual
The general public and the media love to over react. It does my head in. A meaningless distraction from more important matters.
Nice...
"...two roles ≥ same place ÷ one person + same time = ain't possible."
Very funny :)
The better question is "Why
The better question is "Why is there a story about this on AfterEllen???"
Just becasue there was some faux lesbian rumor about her does not mean she is worthy of coverage. Agh! I always try my best to ignore the latest teeny bopper craze but somehow it always seems to find me! Agh!
Seriously
I'm not really sure why I should be caring about this article at all. I thought AfterEllen was about "News, Reviews & Commentary on Lesbian and Bisexual women in Entertainment and the Media", so how does this apply? Maybe I missed something....
.......
Well Said
The point of blogs here has always been that they can take the discussion a step further. Sometimes this means delving deeper into the theme of the site, and sometimes it is just a reflection of the blogger's state of mind or interests at the time.
Just because Miley Cyrus is a teen (and likely straight) commodity, does not mean that lesbians cannot be interested in her. If that were the case that we could ONLY discuss straight and bi women, the AE Top 100 list would be a HELL of a lot shorter.
I, for one, would hate to see a ban of discussion on Tina Fey (as would most of AE, I am sure) merely because she is not deemed "lesbian enough" to be a topic of discussion.
Also, keep in mind, AE does have younger readers. So if the younger crowd wants to imagine what life would be like if Miley were a bit more "dykadelic", where is the harm?
actually,
you can split Miley Cyrus/ Hannah Montana in several pieces and reassemble those pieces in a different ways so you get two identical copies of Cyrus/Montana.
This is also known as the "Banach–Tarski paradox"
........
here on the blog, anything goes
The idea is that we are giving you our perspective on the world of entertainment generally. The bloggers are all gay or bisexual, and we hope we offer a view that the mainstream media doesn't always offer. And yet we still cover mainstream stories sometimes (as well as less popular stuff). Essentially, it's a lesbian/bi "take" on pop culture in general.
In short, anything goes, and we just write about whatever piques our interest — and we hope sometimes it will pique yours too. :)
Damn!