News, Reviews & Commentary on Lesbian and Bisexual women in Entertainment and the Media

Remembering “Julia”: Fonda and Redgrave’s romantic friendship

I was flipping TV channels the other evening in the U.K. when I came across an old film I had never seen before. Set in the 1930s, it starred Jane Fonda and Vanessa Redgrave as two young American women: Vanessa Redgrave as “Julia,” the idealistic, left-wing daughter of a wealthy New York family, and Jane Fonda as “Lillian,” her best friend who also narrates in voice-over. I was instantly drawn in — not only because it’s so rare to find a film that centers on two female characters, but also because almost from the beginning, there seemed to be a strong, haunting, homoerotic quality to the friendship between the two women that I was sure I wasn’t just imagining.

But what was this film, and why hadn’t I heard of it before? Doing some quick Googling in a commercial break, I discovered that it was titled Julia, that it had been made in 1977, and that it was a rather prestigious production — it had been nominated for 11 Oscars and won three, including one for Vanessa Redgrave as Best Actress in a Supporting Role. Most interestingly, I discovered that it was based on a short story by Lillian Hellman, from her memoir Pentimento, written in 1973. That’s as in the playwright Lillian Hellman, author of the lesbian-themed play (and later movie) The Children’s Hour.

Returning to the movie, I quickly realized that, alas, any lesbian attraction between the two lead characters was going to remain subtextual. Jane Fonda’s Lillian becomes involved with the male writer Dashiell Hammett (as the real Lillian Hellman did in life), while Vanessa Redgrave’s Julia goes off to Europe to study under Freud, and becomes increasingly involved with anti-Nazi causes as World War II approaches. The movie is, in fact, a compelling and tragic drama about Julia’s participation in the anti-fascist resistance, and how her best friend Lillian is drawn into helping her in highly dangerous circumstances.

Since I was (still) certain I hadn’t imagined the homoerotic subtext, however, I dug out an old copy of Pentimento that I had never read. Sure enough, Hellman reflects on her feelings for Julia, in a paragraph that was omitted from the film’s voice-over:

“In those years, and the years after Julia’s death, I have had plenty of time to think about the love I had for her, too strong and too complicated to be defined as only the sexual yearnings of one girl for another. And yet certainly that was there. I don’t know, I never cared, and it is now an aimless guessing game. It doesn’t prove much that we never kissed each other ...”

While the film leaves out these reflections, it does include a scene (also from the book) where an angry Fonda slaps a male friend after he has suggested that everyone knew she and Julia were lovers. Like so many Hollywood movies, in other words, it only brings up the subject of homosexuality explicitly in order to discount it. But the friendship portrayed between Fonda and Redgrave’s characters still carries a special charge for lesbian and bisexual viewers — worth a look if Julia ever pops on your TV screen, or if you feel like investing in a new DVD.

  • browne's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Ace14's picture

    Flashback

    Wow, I haven't thought about that movie in years. We watched it in my high school English class (circa 1985 or 86), and I believed we discussed the lesbian subtext. I imagine I was trying not to look too interested at the time.

    In hindsight, I'm pretty sure that teacher was a lesbian. :-)

    Thanks for triggering the memory.

    gypsywee's picture

    I LOVE this film! FYI: This

    I LOVE this movie! FYI: This is the first film in which Meryl Streep appeared--her role was small but well played.
    bksn's picture

    One of my favorites

    I actually bought this DVD recently and forced all my friends to watch it because it was Meryl Streep's first film. I remembered loving it when it when I was about 10 years old. I had forgotten any lesbianish subtext. All I remembered was that I loved Julia (Vanessa Redgrave). So as we watched it, we all laughed at the real reason why I had remembered the film so fondly.
    huzzahbravo's picture

    Just to complicate things a little

    I adore Lillian (I thesised on her in undergrad), but read her memoirs carefully . She's a notorious liar. She's also a highly skilled dramatist. It makes for some wonderful reading, but many of her contemporaries questioned the veracity of a lot of her memories and experiences, particularly Julia.

    Many consider Julia a fictionalized version of Muriel Gardner, an American heiress who resisted Nazi control in Austria. The Nazis dearly wanted to capture her, but she and her husband managed to flee on the last boat out of Austria. Their lawyer, Wolf Schwabacher, sheltered them until they got back on their feet. Hellman also used Schwabacher as a lawyer. Garnder recounted years after WWII that Schwabacher used to entertain her with stories about his glamorous theatre friend to take her mind off the war. Schwahacher also likely told his theatre friends about the wealthy Austrian heiress.

    There are a lot of similarities between Murial and Julia (and here I quote an article from the Feb. 7 1985 Philadelphia Inquirer: "Both the real-life and fictional woman had grown-up in Jewish families with meat company fortunes. Both studied English literature at Oxford in the early 20s, both studied psychoanalysis under a pupil of Sigmund Freud, both married a leader of the anti-Nazi underground, both had a child, a daughter, both were involved in the resistance in Austria, both helped finance the resistance from their pocket, and on and on and on."

    This is me again: There's no way Muriel Gardiner and Julia could have both been students of Freud and fighters in the underground without knowing about each other. Gardiner avers she knew no Julia. Records at the University of Vienna corroborate Gardiner, proving that there was only one American student enrolled during the years - Gardiner - when Hellman said Julia enrolled there. Hellman’s biographer, William Wright, glosses over this incident, writing, “Hellman can only be applauded for seeing the dramatic possibilities in this woman’s life and its current relevance for all Americans."

    So, should we applaud Hellman for professing same-sex feelings for a woman? Absolutely. Should we question Hellman's motivation? Absolutely. Can we declare Lillian bats for our team? I'm not so sure. She did give us stage space when few if any others did, but her representation of lesbians is so complicated, that it's hard to know what her personal stance was. And remember, Lillian always insisted that "The Children's Hour" wasn't a play about lesbianism, but the power of lies to destroy innocent lives.

     


     

    Radical Bradacal's picture

    impressive!

    I myself am a big fan of Lillian Hellman's plays (children's hour and little foxes in particular) - though her life was a lot more messy than I could handle.

    Julia, I'm almost positive is a representation of many things, and definite fodder for Hollywood. As a dramatist, Lillian would be more interested in possibilities, rather than actualities. I don't believe a work like the Children's Hour was written for Lesbian rights. She did what so many (including Shakespeare) have done before her - she wrote a play to be produced and sell tickets, genius as it is.

    Also remember that Lillian was Dashiell Hammett's lover for years and years. So again, I really don't think she was a lesbian. Though certainly a liberal.


    User login

    Recent comments

    After Ellen home page on logo online