ABC focuses on an "atypical lesbian couple" tonightConsidering the general public’s lack of enthusiasm when it comes to granting equal rights to gay Americans, the mainstream media has been quite enthusiastic about gay issues lately — especially when it comes to transgender citizens. Oprah’s infatuation with “the pregnant man” Thomas Beatie last year started a pretty heated public debate about transgendered parents — which may have inspired ABC to tackle the subject in an upcoming special, dramatically titled Primetime: Family Secrets.
The hour-long special, which airs tonight, tells the story of Rene and Chloe Prince, who, as ABC will surely remind you, “are not a typical lesbian couple.” That is because Chloe Prince was born Ted Prince. ABC explains further: From early on, Ted Prince never felt completely comfortable in his male body. As a boy, he secretly dressed in girls’ clothes and wondered what it felt like to be a woman. He felt alone in his gender identity confusion, not knowing that millions of others face the same challenges. Though still confused as an adult, Ted got married and had two children, hoping it would resolve his secret. His wife Rene was aware that he had a closet full of women's clothing, but hoped it wouldn't affect their relationship. But when Ted had an allergic reaction to a bee sting one day, a shocking diagnosis followed that would unleash the inner female Ted always knew he had. And last spring, Ted underwent massive surgery in Thailand to become Chloe.
Cameras followed the couple for a year, as their two sons went from having a mom and a dad to two moms and Rene’s husband became her wife. While I am all for increasing trans visibility, I find the premise of the show a bit troubling for a number of reasons. First of all, the show was filmed as Chloe was transitioning. Anyone with trans friends can tell you that is not an easy time. The show’s description mentions how the boys are “forced to adjust” and how Rene is not happy with Chloe’s new body — if you haven’t even come to terms with the transition as a couple, why would you subject your children to being the stars of a Primetime special on ABC? Second, the show’s description is begging for a wingnut from Fox News to call in child services: This couple is “redefining” their family. Poor word choice, ABC, we have all had enough of it. It seems to me that instead of highlighting how many happy families with same-sex parents are out there, this special aims to sensationalize and demonize Chloe: Chloe’s transformation has brought them all into uncharted territory. During the hour, viewers see just how challenging Chloe’s transition has been on herself everyone close to her, but at what cost?
Dun, dun, dun! At what cost? Is it better to continue living what you feel is a lie? Ever since the news business started its rapid decline, we have been subjected to more shock and awe tactics by primetime channels than ever before. It’s not about increasing visibility for trans citizens, it’s about getting viewers all worked up. Soon enough, Chloe will be on The View, arguing with Elizabeth and promoting her book, and Bill O’Reilly will get people like my father on a warpath while replaying a clip of an upset child: “Look at this,” he will say, “This child’s life is ruined!” Maybe I’m being a little doom-and-gloom considering I haven’t watched the show yet, so I suppose I’ll have to tune in. In the meantime, Chloe has taken to her own blog to ask that viewers watch the episode with "an open heart and mind": I ask that you ... reserve judgment, and understand this is only my story, and does not represent all Transgendered or intersexed people. . . . This episode is not about exercising any agendas for the LGBT community. If you're looking for political correctness or walls to be broken through by this story, you will be disappointed. However, if you are looking for the honesty told from compelling innocence, without bias or reservation to share, then you will want to look forward to the episode. Will you be watching? Submitted by on July 21, 2009 - 10:00am. |
Recent blog posts
New forum topicsActive TopicsNew Comments
|





Facebook
Twitter
Interesting
If I was in his shoes, I wouldn't go through the surgery. How can you stand a person cutting you up on purpose. My fear of the knife would overcome my need to be another gender. Crazy what some people would do though.
www.cheebras.com, Nice things for Naughty Kitties
Another interesting thing
You realize this is like a straight woman saying "If I was in Cheebras' shoes, I wouldn't go through with dating women. How can you stand being with a womasn on purpose? My fear of God/whatpeoplethink/etc. would overcome my need to be a lesbian/bisexual woman. Crazy what some people would do."
You are obviously not trans. This isn't about someone deciding, on a lark, to get SRS. Fear of the knife is nothing compared to living the lie.
Also, addressing Chloe as "he/him/his" is incredibly disrespectful.
Agreed
Completely!
No one wakes up one day and say "Hey I want a sex change and be said gender of my choice" Just like no one wakes up one day and say "Hey how fun would it be if I would to be homosexual/bisexual" It is a life long journey just like when you come out as a homosexual/bisexual. You just don't come out and that will be the end of your journey. Because there are people who go back in the closet due to various reasons later on in life.
Like the song "Take it One Step at a Time"
Ditto
My ma said if you don't have anything nice to say don't say anything at all. That said I will omit the explitaves... What I can say is it's not for you to get Cheebras. Plain and simple. And yeah using male pronouns is blatantly rude. Empathy, not apathy. We're one community. In my opinion at least. We stand up for each other.
ABC's portrayal wasn't the way they should have portrayed this particular familial sittuation.
Not necessarily
You can be trans and not have surgery. I'm not saying that's what the original poster was suggesting she would do, but it's possible. I have to agree that while no, I'm not trans, so I can never quite understand, I don't think anything could convince me to undergo surgery like that and I'm not even irrationally afraid of surgery. Many FTMs do not have bottom surgery - and that doesn't make them any less trans.
What I don't get is ...
why people say that they don't get it.
What's so hard about it?
Not all trans get the SRS
It goes on an individual basis.
Not a niptuck ordeal, rigorous therapy pschologically, before any medical professional will consider you for the SRS. Not everyone needs to the SRS to fill whole.
That is true
Not all trans get the SRS. I am trans(genderqueer) and do not plan on getting the SRS. It is a complex situation to understand. But as long she is happy I don't see why it matters. But that was not what she was questioning at hand.
Clearly the above poster she responded to did not comprehend the situation thoroughly because she associated the situation as a simple nip tuck type of ordeal. This is not some nip tuck situation because someone woke up one day and said hey I want to be of said gender. That is the difference. This is a life long journey,
(trans=equals umbrella word ie. transgender,transexual,genderqueer,gender variant, gender neutral, cross dresser, etc.)
oh, totally
"You can be trans and not have surgery."
Oh, totally. I know that. But Chloe did have SRS, and her decision was being questioned. And for some pretty silly reasons, too. Whether someone has surgery or not, it's their decision, and not something that a cisgendered person has any basis to question.
All I saw the poster say was SHE wouldn't do it
I realize the "crazy what some people will do though" was a bit harsh, but I would say the same thing about plenty of things. I have friends who have gone sky-diving, for instance, and while I understand that they really wanted to do that, there's no way I ever would. Not to say that the two are at all on the same plane, but just to say that there's plenty of things I would never do that are clearly totally valid for other people to do.
But it's political
Gender is a very political subject, and while you may not want to go skiing, your lack of interest (and voicing this disinterest) will not result in oppressive policies and norms staying in effect.
It's like me saying, "why would anyone want to have an abortion? I think it's killing a life and I would never do it." While I NEVER said the right to have an aborotion should be taken away from women, my politicised, yet personal, comment is dangerous (and moot) to the subject of abortion.
If she wouldn't have surgery, that's fine. But making it seem extreme and crazy is a political statement against transpeople, whether she meant it to be or not.
I agree that minds needs to be changed on trans issues.
I wonder, if the poster had to have a masectomy because of cancer, whoule (gendered) reconstructive surgery would be out of the question because of her fear of knives?
Just because surgery is reinforcing a given birth gender does not make it more valid.
Yeah
..it's complex.
From my experience, the big step, as ever, is actually coming out and being yourself, and living how you choose. How your alter your body is a component of that and it's driven by personal feelings of identification as well as a lot of other factors.
It is a very difficult thing to explain I guess, but all I can suggest is that you are maybe putting yourself in the wrong pair of shoes. As you are a woman, instead of thinking "if I were a trans-man (FtM) would I go through with it: think about if I was a trans-woman (MtF) would I go through with it. There's no right or wrong choice of course, it's personal, but it may help you if you examine it from the perspective of a woman with the "wrong body" rather than a man :)
There are obvious practical considerations too: genital surgery has a more functional outcome for MtF transsexuals than FtMs and I suspect that plays a part in any choice. i.e. what do I gain for going through with this in realistic terms. Genital surgery is essentially a cosmetic proceedure but it can make a big difference in how you can live your life.
Hm, well im definitely going
$$$
From what I understand, the transitioning process can become quite expensive, so my guess that is the reason they let a film crew into their home...
I'm curious to find out if Rene was bisexual prior to Chloe's transition because I find it hard to believe they could have much success as a couple afterward. I hope Rene is not staying just for the kids. :/
Guess I'll have to watch and see!
I was thinking the exact
Hey you never know
Love is love and if she loved her husband there's a good chance she will love her wife. I have a lot of trans friends--two of whom recently wed *sidebar-they got legally married because Rachel is now legally Ray. Pretty sweet*. Anywho-Ray's wife was a die hard self-proclaimed "bull dyke" all of her life and when Ray transitioned she had a really hard time with it. But eventually they adjusted because they love each other. They both still identify as gay. Ray's just the gayest boi ever now :)
Adversely I know many FTMs who were gay women and have now become gay men. The point is you never know how any one individual or couple will work things out it just depends. I'm very fascinated by gender fluidity.
wow
this looks really interesting. granted, it may not be perfect, but the fact is, trans issues get very little visibility and it's important that the public learn more about them. television - and reality especially - will never be the perfect medium, but i think this does seem like a step in the right direction. for every person who may be turned off or confused by Chloe's actions, there's another out there realizing that they arent alone -- and that's incredibly important.
---------
http://rightmindleftcoast.wordpress.com
Am I the only one
Hmmm
If I weren't working tonight I would definitely watch it. There are definitely questions-all of which, I'm sure, will not be answered tonight.
http://ohiolezgirlinnyc.wordpress.com/
Sweet
I'm so watching tonight : D
I don't see it as typical well typical for those in the LGBT community but a lot of my friends do not understand how a MTF can be a lesbian after transitioning. They are all like how does that happen why did she stay a he. It will definitely be an educational experience. I tried introducing them to some of my MTF and FTM friends that are homosexual and it just blew over their heads.
I'll definitely be watching
How could I not watch?
I definitely agree. As they
I definitely agree. As they mention in the "synopsis", it may bring confusion in the household at first but kids can absolutely tell whether their parents are happy or not and I think it's fundamental to their own well being that their parents feel in sync with their identity.
________________________
"I know it hurts. But it's life, and it's real. And sometimes it fucking hurts, but it's life, and it's sorta all we have." Garden State
Ill watch the show. I
OMG
I am so sorry. That is horrible. I hope things are on track for you now.
Yes, I'm okay. Thanks,
So wrong!
So sorry... Also pisses me off that you'd lose a tenure track position at a college (I guess I have the unreasonable expectation that universities should be ahead of the popular progressive learning curve).
I'll watch
well
im always intriqued by this especially when it comes on National Geographic, TLC, Discovery, and even the History channel. i'll see if i can catch it if i dont forget. i seen enough of these specials but they dont ever bore me. lately, ive been watching a lot of stuff that had to do with female to male stuff but im more intrigued by the male to female transition. thailand has a big trans community that is often spoke about but once again, it would be nice to see it from an american male to female view.
du du du-interesting.
but are they really lesbians or are they just with one another for the sake of the marriage....dun dun dun-ill find out tonight if i watch it. (^ ^)
well i enjoyed this show but
i thought intersex was someone who was born with both female and male organs not genes. is it possible to be YYX?
the kids were cute and i enjoyed hearing the youngest boy keep correcting Chang by saying over and over "SHE!!". lol cute. i kind of got angry a little when Chloe was questioning her transition when she went to go visit her ex lover. all that work and money would be wasted if she started regreting the decision. not only that, she wouldnt be able to have a surgery to get a penis back. but im glad she shook that idea from her head.
them getting a divorce. well technically the red hair woman(forgot her name) married Ted, not Chloe. so the papers say Ted not Chloe.
Interesting how she went to Thailand but thailand is known for their high demand on transitioning surgeries. this was a good special and even though i felt the journalist was kind of pushing it to make things seem negative, i believe it came out quite positive.
Me too
I had always thought that being intersex referred to genitals only (and not an issue of chromosomes), but according to Wikipedia, that's not entirely true (granted, Wikipedia isn't always the best source of info, but it can be a good start).
And it turns out that yes, it is possible to be XYY http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XYY_syndrome
From what I recall from
From what I recall from undergrad (now in microbiology; single celled critters are in a world of their own reproductively), intersexuality is massively complex, and can occur with widely varying external signs, depending on what the underlying reason is (different genetic causes, atypical hormonal stuff, etc). There's a huge number of ways development can vary from what is typical.
XYY can occur (as can X, XXY, XXX, XY females, and others), but apparently most XYY males are physically and mentally 'normal', so it doesn't often get picked up.
ya 'normal'
whatever 'normal' is lol!
It's amazing how much we assume is normal because it isn't spoken about, it could be just 'managable', and 'manageable' with therapy and the help of an endochronologist to get extra testosterone injections, etc...
Intersex just means not fully one or the other
Sex is defined by three things - genes, genitals/gonads, and hormones. Someone can be intersex because they have both female and male genes (for instance, chimeras who have some XX cells and some XY cells) or abnormal genes (XXY for example), both female and male gonads or gonads that are neither one or the other (more traditional "hermaphrodites"), or because each of their three things is clearly one sex - but the three don't match the same sex. For instance, if you are XY but have female hormones and organs, you might look entirely female but you are intersex.
In Chloe's case, she had XXY chromosomes, presumably normal male genitals, and after the bee sting, female hormone levels.
According to Wikipedia, you can be XYY as well as XXY, X, and apparently some tetromies too. The only thing you can't be is YY - there are genes on the X chromosome that aren't on the Y so that mutation would be lethal (also not sure how you'd get it, as you would have to get a Y from your mom....).
I thought the son saying "SHE" was supercute too, and yeah I thought it came out positive overall.
I would say no, but that it
She's not trans, she's intersex!!!
I can't believe they promoted it the way they did - Chloe is intersex, XXY. She actually naturally became feminine, unlike most transwomen - her breasts grew on their own, she became more feminine, etc. I'm still in the middle of it but it seems the SRS was only for genital surgery (which was obviously not going to change itself).
This also should make it somewhat more understandable to even homophobes/transphobes - she wasn't either anyway, so she had to make a choice, and she chose the gender she'd felt more like all her life. If she'd chosen male it seems she still would have had to have medical intervention to put her hormones back in check.
Also, by portraying her as "trans" I think it makes it seem like all trans people must have some sort of medical issue like she does, which is obviously not true.
I think it would be totally reasonable for Rene to leave Chloe, and if she is that upset maybe she should do that. Kids deal with divorce all the time.
Cute kids
They seem intent on saying that the kids are tramautized but that is clearly not the case. The kids are totally cute about it and tell the little story about what they think happened. Yet they kept asking them leading questions and bringing up bad memories about people who are mean to them.
The only slight problem they have is bigotry. Why is it Chloe's fault that some of her sons' friends or her relatives are bigots or tease them? For that matter, it's exactly the same argument people give for why gay people shouldn't have kids.
just watched it
I think this just confirms
I think this just confirms 2 things:
Gender is fluid but love transcends gender.
After seeing the show
"they never seemed to go as
"they never seemed to go as deeply into the emotional trauma that Chloe had gone through as Ted while Rene was comfortable, as they did with Rene's discomfort with Chloe."
that is a really good point!
I knew that they were going to portray Chloe