Welcome to AfterEllen.com!

Enter your AfterEllen.com username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
News, Reviews & Commentary on Lesbian and Bisexual women in Entertainment and the Media

“Beowulf” update: Spawn of Angelina

Well, that's the most tabloid headline I've ever written. But then again, what you're about to see will shock, amaze, make you laugh, make you cry, make you glad that CGI creations don't have an olfactory presence. (What? It's Friday; I'm giddy.) Personally, I've been waffling on the Beowulf film. On one hand, I really hated reading the Cliff Notes to Beowulf. On the other hand, there is the promise of some nifty battle action, and there is also this.

As Dorothy Snarker and a few of you commented, animated Angelina has a certain artificial allure. Her presence could even overcome my biggest potential irritation with the film: Bad adaptations (as this one threatens to be) of classic works (even the ones I didn't read) mean me making a nuisance of myself by saying things like, “No, kids, the REAL The Scarlet Letter does NOT have a happy ending.” Um. Quick, more pictures!

http://www.afterellen.com/sites/www.afterellen.com/files/images/1joliesm... ">

My other issue with the movie is the whole CGI phenomenon: I'm not sure that animating real-life actors like this is ultimately more interesting (even though Jolie with a tail is sort of neat). Also, the CGI landscape sort of looks like cut sequences in a good video game.

http://www.afterellen.com/sites/www.afterellen.com/files/dragon101207.jp... ">

Except that video game villains are generally visually striking. This brings us to my point: Jolie's animated spawn. Meet Grendel, her monster spawn.

There's no way to put this delicately. Somebody dumped a bucket of excrement all over Beaker from the Muppets, and he is really, really pissed off.

These images are from footage available in the latest internationally released trailers. That's trailers plural, because there are family-friendly cuts as well as a new rated-R version. Here's one of the newer G-ish rated trailers, which shows more story and more of Robin Wright Penn's somewhat expressionless CGI self.




I did view the uncensored trailer — all in the name of research, of course. (You can do your own research here). Gut response: I've stumbled into a medieval Hostel! One scene shows random body parts dangling in what appears to be a medieval meat locker. Second thought: Nudity! Except not really, because it's CGI. Angelina's body is all golden and glowing, and while one of my friends argues that this is her natural state, it's not exactly anatomically correct. There are things missing, things added, and things possibly (ahem) enhanced.

Well. All things considered, I'm leaning toward going. Will you be lining up next month?

  • Jamie Lynn's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Aljan's picture

    I'll line up but only if a certain someone goes with me..... :)

    But I can't come at the whole CGI movie thing. It smacks of cheap. I know it gives Angelina some flesh but its not Angelina doing her thing and I go to the filums to see real actors doing what they are best at, its half the show for me. Graphics for games full stop.
    Kawa's picture

    Silly rabbit, tricks are for kids

    I agree with the poster above.  Although some CGI's can be done pretty well, nothing has ever made me jump and go, "GOOD AS REAL" nope, not going to happen, unless real people jump into computers and become like Tron.  I like seeing actors do their thing on the big screen.  I want to see them naturally move and interact. Not just their head, or voice, or any bits and peices that aren't real.

    "No one in this world is a virgin, the world screws us all!"

    Blah's picture

    Ugh.

    Grendel was the worst book I have ever read. We have to read Beowulf for english soon too, but I'd much rather see the movie. I know it's nothing like the epic poem but it looks a lot less boring.
    dypole's picture

    I! AM! AN IMITATION!

    When I first heard of this film and saw the trailer, I was intrigued. While the CGI thing throws me off (it's the reason The Polar Express creeps me out to no end), I do love me some good battle epics, and it's been so long since anyone released a high-brow one that didn't, well, suck.

    But all these new trailers make me cringe right at the moment when Beowulf screams, "I! AM! BEOWULF!" It's so obviously a ploy to capitalize on the success of 300 and its "THIS! IS! SPARTA!" battle cry; though I greatly enjoyed that movie and own it, I knew going into the theatre that it was mindless entertainment and thus had to be treated as such. But Beowulf? It's based on what is considered a classic, and they're trying to make it seem like no more than the clone of a movie that was based on a graphic novel (albeit a good one) and directed by a music video director. Talk about dumbing down.

    Also, am I the only one who hates Angelina Jolie's faux-exotic accent? If it didn't work for her in Alexander, why does she think it's going to work for her here?

    "Out of the box is where I live." -Starbuck

    alex's picture

    Is the target audience English teachers?

    I've seen this trailer in the theater and I've never heard so many groans and laughs from a trailer. I don't think general audiences care for this one, I don't.
    A.L.'s picture

    Not for English Teachers

    All the English teachers I know wouldn't step a foot inside to see that movie.