Maxim rethinks its position on Sarah Jessica Parker
When readers of Maxim see next month's issue, they might be tricked into thinking the tacky men's magazine has made nice with Sarah Jessica Parker, the actress it infamously voted the World's Unsexiest Woman last year. Parker topped a list of so-called ugly women that included Amy Winehouse, Sandra Oh, Madonna and Britney Spears.

Maxim was roundly criticized for the list and the 43-year-old Sex And The City star was candid with the press about how much the dubious honor hurt her, telling one interviewer, the list was "brutal, in a way. It's so filled with rage and anger."
Next month, Maxim does a 180 on its earlier judgment, naming Parker its "Unexpected Crush," but insiders say the "honor" still contains an insult-laden joke.
Is this what the power of the press has been reduced to? Have we all reverted back to the 8th grade? Remember passing terribly catty notes about classmates we were jealous of or threatened by? Sometimes we made fun of them, sometimes, unfortunately, we picked on their physical attributes because it was, again, the 8th grade, what else did we have going on? It's not like we could be snarky about each other's jobs or spouses or whom we voted for.

It's not just mens' mags like Maxim. Famed film critic Rex Reed wrote a review of Sex And The City for the New York Observer in which he spent an entire paragraph crudely insulting Parker's appearance and specifically, the cute mole on her face. (Parker recently had the mole removed. Coincidence?).
Can I go on the record saying I think Sarah Jessica Parker is one of the coolest, wittiest, most stylish and beautiful women on the planet? Every time I read an interview with her or, even better, see her on television being interviewed, I am awed by her sharpness and her great sense of humor. This is a woman who has been famous since she was a pre-teen (yay, Square Pegs!) yet, she exhibits a down-to-earthness that is real and refreshing.
To those who say Parker is a star and stars enter into fame knowing good and well that they will be scrutinized and criticized, I say: when Parker first got famous, things were different. There were no blogs. There were very little paparazzi. Celebrities were covered in People magazine and on the occasional Barbara Walters special. It was a simpler, more civilized time.

Nowadays, civility is out the door. We all log onto Perez Hilton's popular celebrity site knowing we'll read trash talk, but that mean-spiritedness has now found its way into the mainstream. Those of us made uncomfortable by such catty comments could choose to stay off the blogs, but now, with insults popping up in movie reviews, it's a whole new ballgame. What's next? Will the ladies of The View make fun of guests' weight to their faces? Will Larry King tell a politician he needs a nose job? Will anchormen comment on the presidential candidates' pockmarks?
Parker's right. It's brutal out there. My fear is we'll become desensitized to it. I worry that adolescent kids today are encouraged by the bad behavior of the adults around them. Heck, I worry about us — the adults. I can't figure out what is motivating us to bring out our inner 13-year-old. Are we feeling ignored? Unpopular? Do we feel ugly ourselves? Are we jealous? Why are we all sitting around making fun of each other?
What do you think? Have you been outraged recently by something you read in a magazine or heard on mainstream TV? Are you bummed out by the culture of catty? Or do I need to lighten up?
- Login or register to post comments
- Gina Vivinetto's blog
RECENT COMMENTS
-
thumbs down
Posted by -= yelyahey =- about 12 minutes ago -
i do actually. felix and
Posted by Sunee about 52 minutes ago -
As I lay here reading this...
Posted by ASIA_major about 1 hour ago -
Naomi and Emily <3
Posted by Emma about 2 hours ago -
Project Runway!
Posted by blue_finn about 2 hours ago
ACTIVE FORUM TOPICS
-
The Song Game (20086)
song: “It's my life - No Doubt”Posted by Viviane about 1 minute ago -
Lisa Ray & Sheetal Sheth (79)
aw geesh: “Well, after wading through most of these comments, I have just one thing to say..nuts. I mean, for heavens sake, does it really matter if we knew what each of these actresses' personal lives was...”Posted by befree about 8 minutes ago -
Who here is into/intrested in Kink and BDSM? (1)
Me! Still figuring out what: “Me! Still figuring out what kinks I'm into though, but yeah, I like it. I've played a little bit in the past, but I'm someone who doesn't submit easily, so it's never really happened (didn't have...”Posted by scorpiopixie about 18 minutes ago -
Person BELOW you game (18117)
I do!: “Along with tons of other styles of music:) ...”Posted by ohsweetrefrain about 24 minutes ago -
This or That? (9728)
Lisa: “:D Vacation in London or New Zealand? ...”Posted by ohsweetrefrain about 28 minutes ago


Facebook
Twitter
Comments
They got it right the first
They got it right the first time.
Although she maybe shouldn't have been #1
Um...yeah.
I think Maxim is made up of
I 100% agree with you.
YES!
They were right
Mistaking Opinion for Truth
maybe in another era...
You know, I may be one of a handful of people (perhaps mostly female), of the opinion that SJP is actually rather beautiful. I didn't care much for her look when she worked with Steve Martin in "L.A. Story" or during the first and second seasons of SATC, thinking her a little awkward-looking and too reminiscent of a baby Streisand in "The Way We Were." But she soon came into her own on the show and transformed herself into a stylish, clever, and sensual presence. Like the writer of this article, I enjoy her wit and effervescence. She never comes off as someone who's trying too hard; and is one of few public personalities with true charisma.
I think, too, that her looks are better suited to another time. Had she lived in Ancient Greece or Rome or in Renaissance Italy, she would have been one of the loveliest women around. It's unfortunate that our ideas about beauty have become so generic....
A few unrelated points...
1 - I don't think our ideas about beauty are generic at all. Ask anyone here, and virtually all straight men too, and I bet they'd agree that Catherine Zeta Jones, Katherine Heigel, and Rose Rollins are all insanely hot - and look completely different from each other! (Ok sadly you might have to show the straight men a pic of RR but once they saw her I'm sure they'd agree). You don't have to think that EVERYONE is attractive to have a non-generic idea of beauty. In fact, since beauty is relative, you kind of have to have someone you find unattractive in order to have someone you find attractive (now, of course, who fits in which category may vary some from person to person).
2 - I actually used to have a crush on SJP when I was younger - I was obsessed with Hocus Pocus and her character in particular. Somehow that faded and while I don't think she's the ugliest woman out there, I definitely wouldn't put her in my top100. Speaking of "personality," it dawns on me that though this isn't fair because it's her character, I found Carrie rather revolting in large part because she has a cigarette in her hand virtually the entire show.
3 - I do think it's rather rude and unnecessary to make mean lists. That said, if people wouldn't read it or buy it, they wouldn't make them anymore.
I certainly don't find
I certainly don't find everyone attractive. Cases in point: Katherine Heigl and Rose Rollins do nothing for me.
That said, I would love to take a laser pointer into the offices of Maxim and assess the sexiness, or lack thereof, among those gentlemen.
I guess you prove the point
I guess you prove the point that beauty is relative, because I don't find Heigel or Rollins anything close to insanely attractive.
Beware the Cookie Jar!
agreed on the relativism...
rollins=beautiful
We all log onto Perez Hilton's popular celebrity site.
Actually, I don't. I don't want to put my energy into such a negative site because all I will get back is negativity.
So I go out of my way to avoid online slime.
I have no idea how great or how mean any celebrity or actor is...but I do know that they are human too...so I don't want to join in...it is too easy to be all comfy and safe at home or at work and bash. We have seen it here at AE a time or two...and it sucks.
I read a lot of blogs
but there are a few I actually have to "take breaks" from periodically because I find myself becoming more critical and cruel. It's weird. The cattiness really does rub off on you if you immerse yourself in it. It begins to seem ordinary.
I admire that you avoid those sites altogether. It says a lot about your character.
Are you bummed out by the
Are you bummed out by the culture of catty? Or do I need to lighten up?
It bums me out. For sure. I feel like it is spreading everywhere. The catty-ness, that is. People can't even disagree civily anymore. They resort to personal attacks instead of debating issues or just agreeing to disagree. Look no further than some of the politics threads in the after ellen forums. :( Name calling and put downs are a national epidemic.
SJP is sexy because of her personality
I think people ignore that. I can't find anyone hot if their personality is horrible. I find it sad that so many people put so much focus on looks. Maxim is just trying to make it seem like they aren't the sexist pigs they really are. I find the fact that so many women think it's okay to call SJP ugly disappointing as well . I don't think anyone would want a well known magazine to label them as one of the ugliest women. To me the reason some people label her as being ugly is because she doesn't look like everyone in Hollywood. She has dared to not get plastic surgery, breast implants and no botox. Being unique shouldn't be seen as being ugly.
I <3 your post!
I appreciate ...
this article, very much.
I think it raises some truly philosophical questions ... some of which carry into Linster's Katherine Heigl blog.
I think we are in a time where the term "press" and "media" are drastically changing. The whole blog culture is such a quickly growing phenomenon, often, most of us are receiving news - not through an impartial, balanced report, but through someone else's opionated filter. And I think, unfortunately, the lines are blurring.
You make a good point, Gina, when you say that when SJP became famous, it was a different time. That's a very true statement - "blog" would have sounded like gibberish. However, I think what we're seeing is a frighteningly increased fusion of "news" and "entertainment." And I think this fusion has resulted, like you said, in over-glorified 8th grade gossip - there's usually a very small kernal of truth surrounded by a lot of popcorn fluff speculation and subjective banter.
I think also, with this fusion, our Western fondness for the cult of celebrity is "going viral" as they say, at an alarming rate.
So all of this, again as you said, begs the question - Why?
The gross lack of civility, of ethics, of impartiality is permeating much more of our culture than just entertainment. I think that we, as a society feel out of control. I think that politics, entertainment, and world issues are completely confused. I think that we as a people feel helpless, and afraid, and we turn to mindlessness as a way to numb the panic that has invaded our lives. In no way do I think this is an excuse. I read an article a few years ago on how the majority of US citizens are depressed. And on a larger, perhaps existential level, I feel like this is an underlying, unspoken monster that controls our greater sense of decorum as both a people and as a broken country.
So Yes ... I think as both a people and a country, we really ARE feeling "ignored, ugly, and unpopular."
As far as desensitization goes - I agree with you. Though I think it's been on-going for the past 10-15 years or so. I think the more "connected" we are to technology, the less connected we are to each other in ways that we NEED to be, the less we're connected to our earth, the less connected we are to our humanity.
I think there's a great analogy to this, in that if Orson Welles' radio broadcast of War of the Worlds were to air tomorrow for the first time (on Youtube or digital radio), people would laugh; rather than experience the wide-spread news bulletins being issued about possible, impending alien invasion, and strangers having panic-attacks in the streets.
Words simply don't have the same effect that they had, even 25 years ago. What we say, and what we do have become two ENTIRELY different courses of action. But if sticks and stones break our bones, what are our words doing? Verbal contracts are practically null and void, "promise" has little to no weight anymore. Our words seemingly have lost power, and yet have, through their over-usage and desensitization, have become more dangerous.
So my question is, if our vocabularly and its usage have become simultaneously ineffective and yet more violently exercised, what happens to our fundamental practice of communication? And even more existentially, what happens to our humanity without it?
My treasure is my gallant bark,
My only God is liberty;
My law is might, the wind my mark,
My country is the sea.
Some excellent points
thanks for the mental orgasm
*lights cig* Oh no smoking!!!!
I would also like to add that in my anime-geek "wisdom"; the blending of technological advancement and human communication is only the beginning when we say "the medium is the message". Marshall McLuhan said that and I think it resonates here. As we develope ways of communication, other forms become obsolete. They leave a footprint on where we came from. This day and age there is a cold, industrial, technological romance between us humans and the computer we communicate our messages through.
My theory is the machines we use are emotionaless, cold and non-personal, that as humans we become extensions of the machines we use. This ofcourse does not apply to everyone because the machines we use can be an extension of who we are.
Using this computer and how I write, how my messages are communicated reveals to a certain extent of who I am, or who I would like to be. My face is hidden but my words still have some impact given how I use them.
I think the catty-ness is the "I need to fit in" adaptive mechanism, because we are biological machines. The rise of new technological makes our brains work but not our hearts. At times I feel technology almost devolves us when it comes to human interaction and reminds me of the Manga Chobits (my anime-geekiness!!!) where technology is advanved that persocoms (humaniod robots) take the place of humans, and everyone is fine with it out of the sake of convenience. It could be the safety of being behind the monitor since we are a bunch of cowards, would we say the same things to the person face to face? Would I be so bold and witty in front when really I'm masking a person who is timid and dull? Technology brings out different aspects of people since it a medium that affects our message. Would Perez Hilton say these things to the actors faces? I think not, he'd shit his pants....
So the point is....we are afraid, we want things to be easy, we see that technology is "easy" or makes things easy, it's only a matter of time when we see the full consequnces of the "easy life".
Interesting point, Brackishtea--
incivilian clothing
Unfortunately, in our anonymity, we can all become the abuser, one of the cool kids in school who can openly mock others without fear of retribution...yes, brackishtea, we become cowards behind our keyboards -- as we do behind the wheel of our cars. I can flip you off and then zoom away...
Anonymity has bred an overwhelmingly disheartening crassness...
great stuff
Wow, I appreciate your
Wow, I appreciate your comment (and the following ones) very much.
I don't agree with all of the grand sweeps - I couldn't say, if the changes in media and "communication" are ones of degree or content, quantity or quality. But I agree with your diagnosis that "we as a society" (and not limited to the US) feel out of control of the important things in our lives or public life in general. Because we (as a? culture) are losing the faith in the myth of modernity that "things will get better in the future", we turn to a 'side-show'. And I think, this preoccupation with the 'side-show' is even actively encouraged by The Man. It conveniently reduces the time people have for critical inquiry regarding politics, social injustice etc.
So, in a way, it's the very old concept of 'bread and circuses' - distracting people with popcorn and unsexiest celebrity lists from the important and difficult issues.
But I have to say, that I don't view the situation as hopeless as the article does. The simple reason being that, no, we don't all log onto the gossip sites. And isn't one upside of internet media the constant democratic popularity vote? Clicks count. If page impressions, bookmarks etc. are used to determine the "value" and influence of a website, every one of us has the constant possibility to vote. Just visit the good blogs, the smart sites and search for the intelligent life floating around the interwebs.
The initial euphoria surrounding internet communication and the hope for instant democratization of knowledge and whatnot has worn off fast, but that doesn't mean the possibilities are not there. We just have to use them. It's the same as with tv programs. I'm not going to watch reality tv. It's a choice I make. I'm not clicking along to maxim and (un)sexiest people lists. And i'm not even thinking about buying the magazine.
To respond briefly on the SJP topic: Of course the woman is sexy (or not) depending on who's looking at her. There's no accounting for taste. To even discuss this at great length, is a waste of time and energy in my opinion.
I agree that unsexiest lists and the like are hurtful and outrageous, and we don't need to lighten up about it, we need to complain more.
But in regards to the "everything used to be better"-tone, I would say: Civility hasn't gone anywhere. It's a practice, it's there for every one to use. So let's do that, actively and aggressively. And people will have no choice but to see the light. or some such..
Alas...
So well put Pirategrrrl!
popcorn
I absolutely love the pop corn analogy, I couldn't have said it better myself.
Kristen
I Couldn't Agree More!
We have more ways to communicate than ever, and yet, it seems more difficult to communicate than ever. We are constantly trying to think of new ways to "reach" people. How does one compete in this world of information bombardment? Well...we must think of ways to captivate our audiences. Where I work (at a college), we've moved away from sending email to prospective students and are now sending text messages and creating blogs and video/music downloads.
You're right. Journalism is no longer "reporting the facts." It is marketing (and apparently "eighth grade cattiness" sells these days). What is the truth? If you ask several people to provide an account of a past event, the stories may be quite different and that leads one to wonder if there will ever be "true accounts" to record in the history books of the future. (Of course...that also makes one wonder about the "truth" of any historical accounts. ;-) )
I also agree that we have become so detached...so desensitized...that we've often lost the ability to think of the "other person" as an actual human being...with feelings. (If you look at any of the online newspaper articles that allow comments, you will see how brutal people can be when cloaked in anonymity.) People can project their own thoughts and feelings on others by attacking them in a "post and run" fashion.
There's so much to consider as we examine the impact of technology on our communication. Thank you for your thought-provoking post and thank you, Gina Vivinetto, for an inspirational blog!
Hmmm
Truthful.
You mention the word truthful...but the only truth to it is that it is someone's opinion as to SJP's beauty or lack thereof.
And if the editorial staff of Maxim thinks that she doesn't have it, fine...then they don't put her in the list of their hot 100 or whatever.
But to publicly list her and others as ugly...just shows how loathsome those in charge of the magazine are.
I might have missed it...but is there any publication out there giving us a list where straight women say that they would rather be gay then sleep with these 100 male celebrities? My guess is no.
Until it stops being okay to publicly crush and undermine women for sport...and to put us in our place...then I think we need to speak up on principle alone.
Agreed. SJP and a load of
Agreed. SJP and a load of other women may not be attractive in the eyes of the people over at Maxim, but that's no reason to design a list of the "unsexiest." It's childish, really, and it astounds me they managed to get away relatively uncriticized for something so unprofessional. Ugh!
~ Bianca
Maxim is a magazine full of
Maxim is a magazine full of sexist pigs and they're trying to hide that fact. I don't see women's magazines making lists of the unsexiest men. Whoever says women are more "catty" or vicious than men are is completely wrong.
I really like SJP and Sandra Oh, who was also on that horrible list.
And as for meannes towards women celebs, this website just had a post about how to kill off Katherine Heigl's character because she is an outspoken woman.
touche
Maxim is a pile of S**T
I think it was so childish and unfair of them to say that about SJP. She seem's like an awesome person and as far as I know keep's herself to herself so why bash her like that!? I would love to see what the guy's look like at Maxim magazine. My guess is fat middle aged, unmarried and can't get some. They have no right to judge someone like that with our without a reason to do so. I hate shallow people! There's really no point in them. Just because she idoesn't look like Cameron Diaz does not meen she isn't pretty. If anything I would pick SJP over anyone on their list basicaly because she is a human being and not just a cloned to perfection air head.
The men
Well....
First of all Maxim is a Joke and should be taken with a grain of salt. As for Ms. Parker, she may not be the most beautiful woman in the world but I think she is a cutie. Another show of how the media can suck.
XOXO Zuri
Uh, am I the only one here
Uh, am I the only one here who thinks that SJP has a fabulous body? Not to mention a killer smile and incredible acting chops? All of those things to me are things that make her undeniably sexy.
And screw Maxim. The fact that that list even exists is kind of an insult to female sexuality.
Up until the punching, it was a real nice party...
maybe I'm crazy
DAMN YOU AE!!!! i can no
DAMN YOU AE!!!! i can no longer objectify women because i spend too long wondering what their personalities are like! grrrr.....
as for SJP, in terms of looks, she's not especially on my top ten list, but i'm not saying she's unnatractive and the fact that maxim took the time to mention her as "World's Unsexiest Woman" (along with Sandra Oh????? WTF MAXIM?!?) shows a level of cattiness and lack of maturity that smacks of high school. i can just picture a bunch of fat, balding, middle-aged men sitting in a room going "And you know what would be really funny? If we put that Parker chick on the Unsexiest List! Wouldn't that be a hoot! She's so ugly!" Anyway, for me, SJP is lovely because she's a good actress, has an adorable voice, and just seems like a normal woman. is that so wrong?
as for perez hilton, i'm no psychology expert, but when i (rarely) come across his "articles" (i use the term lightly) i always feel this level of childish vengeance to it. especially his pursuit of celebrities in the closet. there's definitely some unresolved anger issues with that man. on top of that, he just grates on my nerves.
i think technological desensitization has already begun. just look at cyber-bullying, kids beating the crap out of other kids and then posting it on youtube and laughing. we have become a sterilized nation, sitting at home, at our computers, feeling invincible to the world around us. we are inundated with images and videos of what the powers that be feel we should be influenced by, and when presented with something that doesn't fit that VERY small area of criteria, we panic, we react, we become brutal. it's the spanish inquisition. it's the salem witch trials. it's the McCarthy red scare. it's the AIDS epidemic. it's the terrorism scheme. no, SJP is not beautiful by society's standards, but obviously Matthew Broderick seems to enjoy her company. the millions of viewers who watch Sex and the City religiously seem to like her. maxim is one, sexist, old-fashioned, chauvinist cry in the dark. and it's apparent to me that while they'll probably never change, people might.
I think she is pretty
Beauty is so in the eye of the beholder.
5 Unsexiest Women Ever
I'm not sure if there was a article of AE about the actual list, but while you may not find her attractive the other women she isn't the worst. I can think of a few off the top of my head. What it seems to be is this: Who is famous, but not so powerful and well liked that they will crush us if we say she's ugly because she's ugly? (as opposed to Spears and Winehouse who are unsexy because: The reasons cited for her unsexiness include lack of performance ability and the addition of two kids, two useless ex-husbands, and about 23 pounds. Amy is known for her music and the horse tranquilizer thing. Among the reasons for not digging Amy, Maxim cited her translucent skin, rat’s nest do, and her surgically attached bat lashes.)
No one is going to raise the alarm for attacking someone who is a drunk and out of control most the time, or is a sex symbol and always in the news for her antics (Madonna). And really, Sandra Oh isn't that well loved; she is kind of cold (OR HER CHARACTER IS. The Grey’s Anatomy actress is cited as unsexy for her boyish figure and her cold bedside manner.)
But SJP is nice. In fact I think she's extremely cordial and respectful and I loved her line at Steve and Barry's. The only way to make a fuss is to call out a perfectly nice person whom some people might dislike because of her character of Sex and the City. I mean they could have put Winehouse as number 1, but they didn't they put the nice "girl next door". Forget that she has children and a family... gotta sell magazines.
The truth is, she (and Oh) have nothing to be ashamed of and yet their children will be picked on because this made headlines. Ridiculous.
And the beat goes on...
Most of the comments I would have made have already been made, and i applaud those people that did. So moving along I want to point out that we are currently living in a society that raises people up so that we can microscope their physical appearance, relationships, and lives so we can compare our monotonous lives those celebrities. The celebrity worship in this country is extraordinary- and in fact media, in my humble opinion, is quickly undoing years of work by civil rights movements.
Women are more sexualized then ever, and we allow ourselves to be sexulized. Granted the internet allows more avenues to be sexualized through but the fact remains that we allow ourselves to be objectified. As much as we would like to lie to ourselves and say it isn't true, we still live in a world ruled by older middleclass white guys with older middle class white guy values. Some of those values have just been played out- #1 women can't be sexy over the age of 35 and SJP on that list is an example of that myth. Another value that is played out is the Asian either being sexy dragon lady or unsexy frigid ice queen as played out by Sandra Oh on the list.
I vote for a civil rights movement return.
fat people too...
I'd have expected worse
I'd have expected worse from the cheaper magazines - I hate that one week they will me headlining with "OMG FAT AND FLAUNTING" or whatever, and the next week it will be "X's SORROW - HAUNTED BY WEIGHT JIBES". They fuel the fire, douse it, and then set it all alight again. I'm not even sure the truth always comes into it - catiness sells these days.
And the road stretched on like an angry woman...
I am not a big fan of Sarah
but she would have crushed the ego of the magazine if she would have said "Who cares!" To even get mad at being on any list that doesn't have anything to do with what she is actually talented at gives them more power. I wouldn't be mad at a mag that list me as unpretty if I make millions of dollars a year and have a closet the size of apartment buildings. Maxim doesnt rule the world and I am pretty sure half of the women on that Unpretty list were probaly on the Pretty list a couple of years earlier.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder!! It is too proven that some of the prettiest people can have the ugliest personalites that make them ugly.
If I made the money SJP makes I might give someone a bat so they could make me more ugly and I would still go shoppin!! I am counting change to put some gas in my car. I wish Maxium would call me ugly and then give me 30 bucks for my tank!!
Unexpected? I don't think so.
Thanks for this excellent post. Being cool is so profitable at the moment that we're afraid to grow up, and instead we're pursuing mindless conformity where we have to think the same as the everyone else.
Personally, I don't find SJP particularly attractive and I think Sandra Oh is hot as anything.
But who gives a f*** what I think? Maybe my girlfriend. Otherwise it would be no-one else's business, except for the fact that much of the entertainment industry is built on selling women as commodities.
It's very convenient for the film studios if we all fancy the same thing, because then they can sell us bucketloads of Jessica Alba. This is offensive to women but it also makes for boring, predictable entertainment. This is why SJP is Maxim's unexpected crush (she just shifted a ton of product).
It's also why it's our civic duty to fancy as many unexpected women as possible. I look forward to seeing Jane Lynch in a superhero movie and Felicia Day as the lead star in a chick flick.
Sexy voice
I'm just appalled by how many peple dislike SJP. I don't find SJP particularly pretty but she has a SUPER sexy voice and her mannerism, the way she carries herself exudes confidence and sexiness.
Look is one thing but it is charisma that makes one person sexy. Those idiots at Maxim looks at nothing but face, ass & boobs.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"My love life is terrible. The last time I was inside a woman was when I visited the Statue of Liberty."
.
"Appalled" is a pretty strong word