Welcome to AfterEllen.com!

Enter your AfterEllen.com username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
News, Reviews & Commentary on Lesbian and Bisexual women in Entertainment and the Media

"Little Women": Archetypes for every story

I sometimes think back to the summer before my freshman year of high school. My very Catholic school gave us a booklist to read, and as a result of the imposed summer homework (Oh, no! Would all of high school be like this?), I was introduced to the four sisters March. Yes, the booklist included Louisa May Alcott's Little Women.

Meg, Jo, Beth and Amy found their way into my heart that summer of ’65. As I sat out on Mastic Beach in Long Island at the home of one of my cousins, I was transported back to the Civil War and the lives of those four girls. Balmy winds and beach sand under my feet were no match for Southern hospitality, adventurous escapades, plays, balls and the tears shed at the many sad moments in the book. I immediately fell in love with Jo and wished she could hold me in her arms as she did her dear sister Beth. Little did I know that was a portent of my future!

As I grew up and enjoyed different shows on TV, I came to recognize a pattern. Certain shows resonated with me in a way that was so familiar. You know these shows: The Facts of Life, Golden Girls, Designing Women. What was it, I asked myself, that connects all of these shows? And then one day, it came to me. The characters on these shows reflect the attributes of the characters in Little Women.

Jo, the strong woman character of the novel, finds kindred spirits in Jo Polniaczek, Dorothy Zbornak and Julia Sugarbaker. The no-nonsense, take-charge style of these ladies is reminiscent of the young girl who sold her hair to take care of her sisters. Their intensity of purpose might make them seem one-dimensional in a sense. But in the moments that reveal their own personal needs, we see their humanity and appreciate their strength even more. It’s been said that strength without bending in a storm can break an oak, while a willow survives with a few ruffled leaves. These women are no different and survive their trials admirably.

Meg, the motherly eldest, handled the task when Marmee was called to nurse her husband back to health. What better mother was there than Sophia of Golden Girls? Wisecracking and independent, she was irresistible when she imparted her wisdom with a story: “Picture it: Sicily, 1927.” Similarly, Natalie was always mothering her friends at Eastland, despite her comic exterior. And I’d put Mary Jo in that role amongst those Georgia Peaches. She was the practical and most balanced one of the bunch.

Amy, the vain, artistic one, could only be linked to Blair, Blanche and Suzanne. So often we were shocked by their commentary, startled by their in-your-face sexuality, yet sympathetic during their few secret moments of reticence and vulnerability.

Beth, the sweet sister, somewhat fragile and innocent, is bonded in character to the youngest of the Eastland girls, Tootie. And dear Rose Nylund's Minnesota charm and naivete made us laugh and endeared her to everyone she met. Charlene, the lovable and more timid of the Designing Women, had a love for everyone and everything. When it came down to it, emotional strength skyrocketed in these women, who had a way of handling the things their stronger counterparts could not.

In contemplating these ideas for this blog post, I realized that a quartet like this is very common in other female-centric shows. More recently, Sex and the City, Desperate Housewives and even the new Cashmere Mafia and Women’s Murder Club would fit into the mold with careful examination. Going back further in time, even Petticoat Junction’s group of four women leads would lend itself to this pattern. Why is the foursome duplicated unknowingly time and time again? Even in the mythology of many civilizations, heavenly goddesses display such attributes. Perhaps this repetition of these archetypical women, generation after generation, is a hard-wired part of the feminine. Recognizing these singularities in such characters helps us visualize and clarify those attributes in us all.

So, next time you watch a show or a movie with four very individual female characters, reflect back on these comparisons and see if you can identify it for yourself.

  • Explorergal's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Nathiest's picture

    What no mention of

    What no mention of "Lipstick Jungle"? lol

    -Nathiest
    live for lust die for love

    Phoenix's picture

    Wait a minute

    This concept of "four" is alien to us -- we know "one," "two," and "two and some bonus background ones." Please explain. What is "four"?

    </sci-fi fan>

    (Think Battlestar Galactica may be more balanced, actually; hope sometime I can investigate that further.)

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always boom tomorrow.
    --Susan Ivanova tells it like it is

    cosmiccowgirl's picture

    archetypes

    The mother, the tomboy, the coquette, and the angel/naif. I think you're onto something!!

    Carmen's picture

    LMA is my hero.

    Oh, I just LOVE Little Women. It was one of the first long books that I read as a child. I never really noticed the archetypes in other media until now. How interesting.

    The most remarkable thing about you standing in the doorway is that it's you, and you are standing in the doorway. - The Mountain Goats

    SexySadie's picture

    Over-simplification.

    I think your hypothesis is essentially grasping at over-simplifications - that you've chosen shows with (remarkably) 4 semi-main female characters, and tried to hammer them into the "Little Women" mold, without regard for important issues like age or even environment. You have pigeon-holed them into the same single dimensionality you claim these characters defy. In no way to I see Julia Sugarbaker or Dorothy Zbornak as Jo. Linking them simply do to an independent nature?

    I find that a bit depressing and limiting, but as a self-proclaimed idealist, I'll just have to live with it.

    camnista's picture

    Little Women in my heart too!

    One of the first books I read and was actually moved by and loved as a child! Then in high school I did a huge research project on Alcott reflecting on her writing in relation to her life, I found out some really interesting things. Just love Little Women, always will. Interesting article, thanks!  

    Explorergal's picture

    What's wrong with simple?

    CosmicCowgirl ...you 'got it'. 

    I put this forth as an observation that I made.  In no way, do I intend to limit these characters because I noticed a trend that has repeated itself.  I don't think I 'hammered' them in any way.

    Why would an interesting theme be depressing?  We 'file and correlate' all the time to make sense of things in our world.  I noticed similarities in character portrayal and thought it worthwhile examining.  

    In any case, no matter your take on the matter, it started discussion and gave us thought.  Thanks for reading my first blog attempt!

    Mari SanGiovanni's picture

    I like hearing what shapes a person's life...

    I like hearing what shapes a person's life...these things from our childhood will never be the same for everyone, so it makes no sense for people to "critize" another person's observations when they are so deeply personal.

    I would hate to see the same critic HAMMER away at what shaped me as a kid...since most would not be of the literary level of Little Women....at the risk of being laughed at (which I could care less) i give you the following examples from when I was about the age of 12:

    While budding lesbians were watching Buddy...I was watching Sada Thompson...

    ...Betty Buckley...Florence Henderson...Dixie Carter...I think you get the picture. I had no idea then, but I connected with older women even as a child and still do today. I find it very interesting that people don't change much as they develop---but certainly would not want someone to judge me for it!

    --Mari

     

    Mari SanGiovanni

    Author of: Greetings From Jamaica, Wish You Were Queer...

    www.GreetingsFromJamaica.com

    SexySadie's picture

    Please note ...

    I was not "judging" explorergal. I took a different opinion of her hypothesis. Nor did I "laugh" at her or her post. If I did, I wouldn't have posted in the first place.

    The rhetoric of her blog was fairly academic, and that's what I was responding too.

    If you turn me into a pariah, at least have the intelligence to do it within the bounds of my response and the vernacular in which it's written.

    Ace's picture

    Interesting idea

    While I had thought about the Jo March - Jo Polniaczek parallel, the broader pattern never occured to me. I think Designing Women has the best fit of the three you explored. With regard to The Golden Girls, I stop at the Sophia/Meg parallel. I can't buy that one, but I can see how the other three characters would work.

    I would actually characterize Facts of Life a little differently. (I've spent too much time thinking about The Facts of Life.) I would actually correlate Meg/Blair,  Amy/Tootie, and Natalie/Beth (by default). Part of it that that's how they correlate age-wise, but it's not that simple. As vain as Blair is, she has a very compassionate side. She's also a planner and an organizer, and frequently in charge of a given situation. Tootie always had a strong trouble-making, short-sighted streak.

    On a tangentially related note, one of my favorite Little Women pop culture references occured on Friends, when Rachel and Joey traded Little Women and The Shining. It was very sweet when Joey got upset at the prospect of Beth's death.

    Thanks for the interesting idea, Explorergal!

    clever as a belle's picture

    Not just in tv...

    but its the same in movies as well. The movie "Now & Then" is the one that comes to mind right now as I often associate those characters to the women in SATC. But take a look at any movie featuring a group of women and I'm sure you'll see the same thing. I've noticed it but I never thought to trace it back to Little Women.

    Count me in as another that loved the book as a child, I remember reading it at about...7 or 8 for the first time and I fell in love with it. It'll always have a place on my bookshelf.