News, Reviews & Commentary on Lesbian and Bisexual women in Entertainment and the Media

Snap Judgment: The not-quite-triumphant "Return of Jezebel James"

Of the many interesting offerings coming to a TV near you this fall (Hello, Bionic Woman. Nice to meet you, The Sarah Connor Chronicles. Come sit next to me, Pushing Daisies.), one I’ve most breathlessly anticipated is The Return of Jezebel James. My excitement can be summed up in two reasons: Parker Posey and Lauren Ambrose. OK, one more: Amy Sherman-Palladino.

Parker and Lauren teaming up in a laughfest by Gilmores Girls creator Sherman-Palladino? How could it not be brilliant? How? But after seeing promo clips for the new show, I went from delighted squeals to a deflated confusion. I wouldn't call it bad, but alas, it’s nowhere near brilliant. At least not yet.



Now, I realize judging an entire series on three minutes of previews is a bit like reading the CliffsNotes and then writing your doctoral thesis. But, you know what, lazy college students do it all the time, so why not tired bloggers? Certainly there is nothing wrong with the show’s premise, which has estranged sister Sarah (Parker), a successful children’s book editor, and Coco (Lauren), an unemployed bohemian, reconnecting when Sarah asks Coco to be her surrogate.

Yet these clips are troubling for a few reasons. And one of the largest is — and it pains me to say this — Parker herself. The former Queen of the Indies has a zany kinetic energy that somehow seems too big for the confines of the small screen. TV is a different animal, especially in front of a live audience, and her performance feels like Acting with a capital A.

Also, they need to kill the laugh track. Seriously, shoot it and bury it behind the shed. Laughter in a can is bad. It’s like meat in a can — so very wrong. The laugh track breaks the rhythm of Sherman-Palladino’s whip-smart dialogue. Or perhaps I’m just spoiled from Lauren Graham and Alexis Bledel’s impeccable bantering skills. By comparison, these exchanges seem off, like actors reading lines instead of living them. Look, even Lauren seems to know the show’s got issues:

I read that Sherman-Palladino herself hates the show’s trailer and it wasn’t even shown at the TCA press tour (see it here). Which was a good call. I mean, why did they hire the silken-voiced movie trailer guy who does those dire “In a world…” voiceovers? Is an asteroid hurling toward Sarah and Coco, too? The good news is that the series won’t begin airing until mid-season, so there is plenty of time for retooling. Plus, all of these problems are entirely fixable. So, with any luck, I might still get a chance to make those girlish squeals of delight after all.

Nathiest's picture

sisters? awe-crap

Yeah you lost me at surrogate. No shows about babys or having babys thank you.

-Nathiest

globalgrrl's picture

I didn't think you'd lost me . . .

My first thought was: You could say anything--babies, surrogate mothers, aliens from Planet X--and I'd still be there. Not for Posey (about whom I have mixed feelings), but for Ambrose.

Then I actually watched the trailer.

...

I'm not lost yet, but things had better improve dramatically, or Sherman-Palladino will have signed her own DOA notice.

_mcCutcheon's picture

I'm trying hard to still

I'm trying hard to still look forward to this after seeing the trailer. But to be honest, from what I've seen Parker Posey will annoy me like only Julia Louis-Dreyfus as Christine can (I've seen neither in anything else so far). And Coco? I mean, how wrong a name does that sound for someone with the looks of lauren ambrose? sigh... shall wait til episode one for further judgment.
Sapphogal's picture

that killed me

My network dream inches from coming true -- a show to worship because it stars Lauran Ambrose and Parker Posey, how dreamy.  The can o' laughter is the big killer for this show. I cant believe shows even still do that...its so, circa 1970's Odd Couple. Half the comedy in Parker Posey is how she can deliver a line that isnt even intended on being a punch line.... 

Dorothy I dont think your judgement was snappy..... the laugh track is a network death sentence.

tarrabbit's picture

the last 5 mins rocked

i saw the full pilot a couple months ago - the first 15 minutes were unbelievably painful and i was hoping someone would just poke out my eyes, however, in the last 5, the two sisters in the diner showed the potential for what could be.

now let's just hope the writers learn how to finesse and build on it at a much faster pace..

tam358's picture

ew

What weirds me out is the totally different approach to sitcom acting that Lauren and Parker take. I love them both, but it doesn't work in the same show. Parker's doing the overboard, zany, over the top thing that's 8 Simple Rules style, whereas Lauren has taken the more Seinfeld realitic approach. They can't be different!

Ugh. It looks like crap.

sevencostanza's picture

I'm with you...

First off, the laugh track's gotta go.  Use the same shooting style and aesthetic as "Gilmore Girls" had, and it'll sing...
Second, anyone else notice that the knocked up lady in the trailer is Gypsy?  Man, I miss those Gilmores...

Ow, Harold!  Mom said not the head!

User login

Recent comments

After Ellen home page on logo online