News, Reviews & Commentary on Lesbian and Bisexual women in Entertainment and the Media

"Jezebel James" returns, but should she have?

You know that saying, “Looks good on paper”? Everything about The Return of Jezebel James looked good on paper. Bring together the original Queen of the Indies Parker Posey, Six Feet Under darling Lauren Ambrose and Gilmore Girls mastermind Amy Sherman-Palladino and, on paper, the result should be sheer genius. But, in reality, oh dear no.

The show's two-episode premiere last Friday showed us the sad reality of potential unmet as set to the tone-deafening clatter of a laugh track. The setup is pretty simple. A pair of estranged sisters reunite when the older sister Sarah (Parker), an uptight children’s book editor, asks her younger sister Coco (Lauren), a directionless slacker, to be her surrogate. At this point you might be thinking, hey, the whole surrogacy thing worked for Juno. At this point, you would be wrong.

Jezebel James fails to work as either a zany odd-couple comedy or a touching sister-bonding story. The characters feel flat and forced, the dialogue is smug instead of snappy. Were there funny moments? Sure; this is still Amy and Parker and Lauren we’re talking about here. But the potential was so tangible, it makes the show's inevitable weaknesses even more glaring.

One of the biggest problems, besides the (expletive deleted) laugh track (seriously, make it stop, please, make it stop) is series star Parker. Now, this hurts to say, since I’ve loved Parker since her Party Girl days. But, let’s face it, everyone has strength and weaknesses. Parker’s strengths are an off-kilter zaniness coupled with Yankee enthusiasm. She does irony (e.g., every Christopher Guest film, ever) brilliantly. But snark coupled with pop culture minutiae, à la Gilmore Girls, is another skill set entirely.

That said, an actor must work with what she is given, and therein lies another problem. The writing is off. The kind of lightning-quick, light-as-air banter between Lorelai (Lauren Graham) and Rory (Alexis Bledel) doesn’t work here because instead of being complementary foils, Sarah and Coco are adversarial strangers. Sure, at some point they might work up to that finish-each-other’s-sentences mind meld. But right now they’re just getting to know each other again. So Sherman-Palladino has been reduced to getting-to-know-you humor and my-aren’t-we-different gags.

Also, what’s with the character whiplash? From the pilot to the second episode, Sarah goes from a townhouse to the world’s most spacious Brooklyn loft. She also goes from woman who has errant jelly on her shirt, hair and knee to woman who obsessively puts up pink Post-It notes containing instructions for Coco. And, as long as I’m bitching, what’s with the name Coco? Sarah and Coco?

Can it be fixed? Sure, with time and consistency. Will it be fixed? Well, since Fox slashed the series order from 13 to 7, that seems unlikely. Keep in mind, we’ve already seen two, leaving only five more episodes to hit their stride. I’ve seen one of the later episodes and it is, indeed, a little better. But with the tick-tock of the clock and Fox’s somewhat itchy trigger finger, Jezebel James may become yet another casualty of the “Good on paper/bad in reality” syndrome.

So, what did you think? Disagree? Laughed all 30 minutes? Didn’t laugh even once? Discuss.

sjtrich's picture

Parker and Lauren are two of

Parker and Lauren are two of my most favorite actress's - I have to say that I didn't feel the connection between them yet. I think there is a lot of potential there, but as you say, they haven't hit their stride yet. I felt like Parkers lines were forced. I will continue watching to see if they can hit it! Definatly get rid of the laugh track!!
Kaytiana's picture

I managed 10 minutes.  I

I managed 10 minutes.  I might go back and give it a second chance, for I do love Parker and Lauren, but that laugh track was so bad!  I actually couldn't decide if it just wasn't funny or the laugh track was making it unfunny, sadly I think it was the former.
Sue Macy's picture

Lauren + Lauren

Watching Parker Posey deliver her lines was worse than hearing fingernails scratching a chalkboard. I've enjoyed her in the Christopher Guest films, but seeing her in this just brought back yearnings for Lauren Graham. Even with the awkwardness of the script, Graham would have made the show watchable, if not funny. And at least she had chemistry with Scott Cohen (Max on Gilmore Girls). Posey and Cohen had ZERO chemistry. Plus, every character on the show was a poor imitation of those on GG--except for the horribly-named Coco. I say keep Lauren Ambrose, get rid of the rest, and create a new series in which Graham and Ambrose are former college sweethearts who accidently end up living in the same apartment building 15 years later. That would be a show.
cogent53's picture

Awful!

You're spot with the comment about the show. The laugh track was appalling, and as much as I love Parker Posey in the Chris Guest films, she was just totally miscast in this, and that is a huge problem as she's the star. Terrible! I watched the first episode but after a few minutes of suffering the second I couldn't bear it any more. A shame, but the show is a total bomb.
crimson moon's picture

i had to FLIP THE CHANNEL...

it was so bad...i seriously had looked forward to seeing both Lauren and Parker in a zany comedy...zany not stupid, which this was....

what a total waste of talent...so sad

 


User login

Recent comments

After Ellen home page on logo online