News, Reviews & Commentary on Lesbian and Bisexual women in Entertainment and the Media

Demi Moore is picture imperfect for "V Magazine"

I’ve decided that Photoshop has destroyed our perception of beauty. There, I’ve said it. Many of you might disagree, but please hear me out. Photoshop is am amazing invention. I bow to all those with superior Photoshopping skills. Heck, I wish I had them. But at some point, when it comes to representing actual human beings, enough is enough. This isn’t a new complaint, of course. Poor Faith Hill was so thoroughly nipped, tucked, sucked and plucked by Redbook in that now-famous Jezebel expose that she probably half expected to get a plastic surgery bill in the mail. But after seeing the recent shots of Demi Moore for V Magazine, my eyes glazed over again as I looked at what some photo editor thought an already beautiful woman should look like.

Apparently, she’s supposed to look like Lucite. Demi Moore is a great looking woman, period. At 45, she is probably in better shape than most women half her age. But these shots, these shots don’t show a healthy, vibrant 45-year-old woman. They don’t show a real woman at all. At any age, our faces — our entire bodies — have lines and contours, ripples and bulges. They have depth and dimension and, yes, imperfections. And often times it’s those imperfections that make us more beautiful. Can you spot an imperfection here? Or any glint of humanity, for that matter?

 

Now, I’m dating myself, but I clearly remember the first school pictures where we could have the option of having any “blemishes” removed. Touch-ups were extra, but oh, how we all begged our parents to spring for the possibility of perfection. It was a luxury then. But today, it’s standard practice and, might I add, way the hell out of control. Yes, every magazine cover in America (save, perhaps, the news magazines) gets touched up. I understand that. And there is nothing wrong with zapping a zit here or a smoothing a puffy eye there. But must we distort the image of what it means to be beautiful so much that even the most beautiful among us cannot adhere to them? If Demi Moore isn’t pretty enough for V Magazine au naturelle, who the heck is?

Some might ask, what’s the harm in perfecting perfection? Why get all upset about making our most beautiful even more beautiful? Well, there is a lot of harm to get upset about. We live in a society where 1 in 5 women struggles with eating disorders or disordered eating and where 90 percent of people with eating disorders are women between the ages of 12 and 25. A society where half of all girls between the ages of 11 and 13 see themselves as overweight. So for magazines aimed at young women to purposely destroy the beauty standard with their unattainable images is not only wrong, it’s downright evil. If a picture speaks 1,000 words, just think about what kinds of words those Photoshopped pictures are speaking to women everywhere. Well, there is one thing V Magazine got right. When it comes to Photoshopping, it should be that less is more.

renatalie's picture

That's totally right

Thanks for the outrage dorothy! I've been complaining about this kind of stuff for years now. As a journalist I do see the potential in this technology, but I also see the harm in it. It used to be that beauty was just unatainable, now its downright impossible to achieve. literally.

Heartsease's picture

Couldn't Agree More!

If I were as beautiful as Demi Moore and saw that a magazine photo editor had "plasticized" me like that...I would be so insulted!

I'd rather see a real woman with a lifetime of smiles that are revealed through some crinkles around her eyes.
tarrabbit's picture

one thing to keep in mind...

... is that nowadays it is more common for celebrities and their team to have approval of any shots used of their image. so while not all celebrities demand and use this contract point, most do and they along with the magazines are responsible for the look presented.

the blame goes far deeper then the cover.

Shan D's picture

Word to the Snarker!

Photoshopping is great if a picture looks weird in some way - wonky shadows or something else that takes away from what is actually pictured. I think we have to remember that pictures like these are fiction, in a way - airbrusing is just advanced make-up, and pretty damn amazing advanced make-up at that. I 'shop pictures of myself and my friends frequently.

But those pictures? They might aswell have used a cardboard cut-out. It bothers me, because beauty is not by any definition lack of ... characteristic features. Generally, when photoshopping stuff, I use the rule of thumb that I don't take away anything that make-up couldn't have taken away (or added). Make-up can't take away half your bloody upper arm. Which, by the looks of it, is exactly what they've done to Demi Moore up there. The infamous posters from King Arthur (Keira Knightley with D-cups for the loose) and Order of the Phoenix (did they just paint in Bonnie Wright afterwards in those?) are also examples of when enhancing is just ... wrecking.

Natazzz's picture

Does photoshop really matter?

C'mon, it's Demi Moore. Even without photoshop, or hell, even without any make up at all she would still look more beautiful than most of us average folks...

Maybe instead of trying to change the magazines, we could try and change the self-esteem of all these girls desperately trying to be like that...

Hollywood Marie's picture

Demi's not really a great example...

...considering how much plastic surgery she's famous for having.  I don't know if I'd say she's an example of real or natural beauty at all.  What's the difference if they touched her up or not if she's already made herself plastic anyway?  I agree with the sentiment, but the subject is not a great choice.  For the record, though, I'm pretty anti-photoshop, too.
SportyLady's picture

Bravo Dorthy

I agree with you whole-heartedly with everything you wrote.  I will say this one thing though, with absolutely no disrespect towards Demi, it's quite obvious that she's had work done to her body.  It's the belief, especially in Hollywood, that everyone has to remain young.  I guess that's why I appreciate the Kate Winslet's and  the Meryl Streeps of Hollywood.  They are both incredibly beautiful women and are okay with society taking them as they are. 

Today's society is so rapped up in beauty and youth that it's rare for those to think about what impact they have on today's youth.  It's difficult enough being a teenager and dealing with the hormones, cliques and grades but to add body image to the mix, it's difficult.  You're considered weird if you remain an individual. 

I have to say, I really appreciate the article and insight, it was really refreshing.

 

"Normal is not something to aspire to, it's something to get away from."

lunakiss's picture

Sometimes I Forget

This article is such a fresh reminder for me that these womyn are made-up celeberities on the cover and I tell myself stop wishing you can look that way. 

I love the Pro-Activ commercials b/c celeberities like Vanessa Williams and Jessica Simpson both admit they had problem with acne. They show you pictures. You're like 'ok I'm normal now. I don't feel so bad about myself.' Another reason why I  admire Tabloids when they expose female celebs without their make-up. They're not so beautiful after all. That's what you have to look at everyday when if you're  their partner. Then you begin to question 'who's beauty do I appreciate?' not what is the standard beauty?

Oh Photoshop how u r such a womyn's best enemy. 

Did I ever say I would play nice?-Miss Ketina

jackedup77's picture

When do you tell your kid

When do you tell your kid that there's no Santa Claus? The same time you tell them that anything they see on television or in print probably isn't real either. It's all fake and fantasy; even the News.

It should be common knowledge that the people you see in the media don't really look like that. Whether it's photoshop, a little nip/tuck, or a kick ass makeup artist. It's all smoke and mirrors... and a little preparation H.

 

water-fly's picture

well said

i couldnt agree more with you. We're distorting reality in such a way that it is scary
oxoxTeGaNxoxo's picture

it's true

they are doing it to everyone now and it's seriously ruining them another example is A.P (alternative Press) they are doing their next cover of tegan and sara they photoshopped the hell outta it they look soooo much better natural

 tegan and sara photoshoopped

 


User login

Recent comments

After Ellen home page on logo online