Welcome to AfterEllen.com!

Enter your AfterEllen.com username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
News, Reviews & Commentary on Lesbian and Bisexual women in Entertainment and the Media

RachelWatch: Weiner vs. the Tea Partiers

Today: More from Rachel’s Al Gore interview, reactions to the Fort Hood shootings, and the countdown to the House health care vote.

Shootings at Fort Hood

Rachel started us off with a look at the attempts to piece together what happened at Fort Hood and what we know about Major Hasan, the suspected shooter.

Fort Hood Stirs up Prejudices

Rachel noted that reactions to the shootings at Fort Hood have been very much colored by Hasan’s religion. And that’s just in the mainstream press.

FrontPageMag.com went with full-on bigotry, whereas WorldNetDaily hit a level of whack-a-mole conspiracy mongering that would make the Illuminatus Lizard People folks blush.

Rachel welcomed Suhail Khan of the Institute for Global Engagement, who I’m guessing is in for another challenging year.

GOPlan

The Republicans’ sensible bargain-priced health care plan costs $60 billion and eventually leaves even more people uninsured than there are now.

It kind of reminds me of when I was 22 and I bought “bargain” work shoes for my bartending job that fell apart almost immediately and had so little arch support that they left me literally crawling around my apartment after a nine-hour shift.

The difference between me and the Republicans is that I didn’t buy those shoes again, I didn’t try to talk anybody else into thinking my purchase was an awesome choice, and I didn’t spend days on end bloviating about how much I cherished the freedom to be in terrible pain and unable to reach my toaster oven.

Now Newt Gingrich (R – Your television, for ever and ever) and Governor Rick Perry (R – Secessionist Texas) are urging the Texas model of health care. (Warning: DO NOT BUY THOSE SHOES.)

We also got a soupçon of disingenuousness from Representative Michele Bachmann (R – The Land of 10,000 Lakes and Maybe One Lake of Fire) and a visit from Representative Anthony Weiner (D – New York) straight from the House session on the health care bill.

SPOILER: The health care bill passed on Saturday night, but not before the cheerfully insidious Stupak amendment was inserted at the last minute.

It’s being presented by conservatives as a simple amendment to stop federal funding of abortions, which is a lie. That language was already in the health care bill.

The Stupak amendment would stop insurance companies that participate in the public plan from offering abortion services — which means most will opt to drop those services rather than take a huge financial hit. Where’s that part where conservatives don’t want the government to interfere with business again?

The amendment will drastically reduce women’s options where it doesn’t cut them off completely. Which is totally awesome, because apparently restricting access to safe abortions instantly solves all the problems surrounding them.

If this little development infuriating to you, now would be the time to direct a few choice words at your Congressional rep. There is still time to get the language out of the bill.

One More Thing:

Rachel passed on the most fascinating bit of Capitol Hill gossip I’ve heard all year: Michele Bachmann’s chief of staff quit right before her rally for freedom, bloody Nancy Pelosi costumes, and proudly coughing for weeks at a time.

Apparently Ms. Bachmann runs through a lot of staffers, but that’s probably because it’s really hard to figure out how payroll should work when you keep discovering commies in the mix.

Ms. Information

Rachel reported that unemployment hit 10.2% and unemployment benefits finally got extended for up to 20 weeks.

Republicans had filibustered the benefit extension three times because they wanted to add an unrelated anti-ACORN bit. So, sorry if anybody got evicted, but at least a telegenic shouting issue got a little more time!

Rachel also gave us an update on census worker Bill Sparkman’s death that made at least one viewer say “The hell?” out loud.

Kentucky authorities are now suggesting that Sparkman wrote “Fed” on his chest, stripped nearly naked, blindfolded and gagged himself, duct-taped his ID to himself, bound his own feet and hands, and then somehow used the minimal hand movement he had left to commit suicide.

In a related story, Kentucky authorities are now “80% sure” that Julius Caesar and Rasputin also did themselves in.

And because she is a conscientious nerd, Rachel issued a correction on herself.

On Thursday, Rachel made fun of Congressman John Boehner (R – Ohio) for whipping out his not-at-all-a-prop portable copy of the Constitution and then — Oopsie! — quoting the preamble to the Declaration of Independence.

(Sometimes, when you are overwhelmed by sincere patriotism, your passion will jump documents. Be very careful about quoting historic national texts if your are standing near any of Benjamin Franklin’s less formal discourses.)

Rachel, in her zeal, had said that the Constitution doesn’t even have a preamble, which of course it does.

She made it up to all of us with a little help from Schoolhouse Rock.

GOP in Exile

Rachel looked at the sad, lonely case of Governor Charlie Crist (Florida), who was one of the Republican governors reasonable enough to admit that his state could use a little federal stimulus help.

Now, however, the far right wing of the Republican Party is trying to hunt down and eat any party members who don’t automatically scream “Government BAD!” every time their shock collars go off, and Governor Crist is getting a little nervous.

So nervous that he is now saying he has always hated that darned stimulus package.

So nervous that he has forgotten about the existence of videotape and the Internet. Oh, dear.

Cloudy with a Chance of Baloney

Senator Barbara Boxer (D – California) demonstrated her black belt in political badassery by getting the climate change bill out of committee without a single Republican vote. Apparently she’s the only Democrat who has figured out that the Republicans don’t actually want to help with anything.

(Senator Boxer, can you signal to the others, somehow? Semaphore? Notes in invisible ink? Saying it out loud?)

After reminding us all that Senator Inhofe (R – Oklahoma) wants to bring a Truth Squad to Copenhagen (Please let there be tights and capes!), Rachel gave us a bit more of her talk with former Vice President Al Gore.

Gore surprised everyone by doing the interview while sitting in an idling Hummer, cooking up a steak with a portable hair dryer, and insisting on a new plastic knife and fork for every bite.

One More Thing:

Ever wonder what to do when everyone is sitting around after a big Thanksgiving meal? Have you been looking high and low for something that’s fun and appropriate for all ages?

Search no more! Coal coloring books are here!

  • Ali Davis's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Penny Winterr's picture

    Shame on Congress

    for allowing the Stupak amendment to pass.  Here's a list of the congressmen and women who voted for it:

    http://openleft.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=5DA30AFB11A2FAF3DF543B44B906...

    ysubassoon's picture

    Gah! Please get the basics right.

     Here's the deal.  John Boehner held up a copy of the Constitution and then quoted the Declaration of Independence but attributed it incorrectly to the Preamble of the Constitution.  Rachel then attempted to correct him and made an error of the same proportion by saying that there was no preamble, an error that she has now rectified.  But Ali, in simply reporting her correction, you made an error the size of the two that came before.  You said that what John Boehner actually quoted was in the Preamble to the Declaration of Independence.  There is no such thing, and as with the other mistakes made about the founding documents over the weekend, a very brief consultation with the documents themselves would resolve it.  The Declaration is at its essence a letter from the Constitutional Congress to King George III.  Letters do not have preambles.  The words "We hold these truths to be self-evident" are found in the body of the letter in the second paragraph.  Please do due diligence on Constitutional matters.  When you or Rachel Maddow or anyone else makes a mistake as big as the error you are correcting, it just makes you look bad.

    "I can never be who I ought to be until you are who you ought to be, and you can never be who you ought to be until I am who I ought to be."--Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

    GrrrlRomeo's picture

    Freaking out over verbal typos

    I know, verbal typos are sort of an oxymoron. But what I mean is when you're thinking one thing but say another. It is, at least to me, just something funny to laugh about. The only due diligence needed is...well, to just correct what you said or typed. I don't think it's a case of not knowing, at least in this case. Yes, I even think Boehner knows the difference and just misspoke. 

    But the cardinal rule of flame wars is if you're going to pull an "I'm smarter than you" move and correct someone even though you know what they meant, you must do it in a way that is grammatically and technically perfect.

    _____________

    Tweet: @GrrrlRomeo

    ysubassoon's picture

    The subject matter counts

    The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are of critical importance to me and to any exercise of citizenship.  I brought those two documents with me when I served in the Peace Corps and read them constantly to gain a better understanding of the role of a citizen in government and vice versa.  My Thai friends and colleagues wanted to compare notes, and I needed answers when they asked why our constitution has not changed in over two centuries--theirs can be completely rewritten by every new PM.  I had to do my due diligence, and I was not afraid to do so.  I even read three other constitutions just for further comparison.  Most people who argue about Constitutional points of law and the vagaries of the Declaration don't know either the text or context of the phrases and sentences on which their arguments stand.  Since all U.S. laws are based upon the Constitution and people on both sides of political debates quote-mine the Declaration to support their points and platforms, I believe that political discourse here would be vastly improved if we all at least got the basics right, and those at least as naturally as breathing. 

    These errors, by the way, do not qualify as typos, verbal or otherwise.  A typo is a misspelling or incorrectly placed punctuation mark or another cosmetic mistake of this nature.  The mistakes made by John Boehner, Rachel Maddow, and now Ali Davis are errors of content, of facts, not grammar or spelling.  When Rachel and Ali made attempts at correcting Boehner and ended making errors the size of his own, they took his place instead of putting him in his.  If any of the three had mispronounced something, that would be akin to a "verbal typo" and you would not hear from me. 

    But since you claim I "freaked out" about this when I only pointed out the error and the importance of getting the facts right on this, you will probably not see it that way.  I hold out a modicum of hope that you will see reason when it is placed before you. <br><br>

    Another rule of flame wars is that when you call someone on grammatical or technical errors, you have to also point out those errors or your complaint becomes baseless whining.  Flame wars also have to consist largely of personal attacks, which is something I haven't done and never do.  If you did your due diligence on me, you would know that.  You don't know what a flame war is and yet are trying to start one, and you completely mischaracterized my earlier post.  You got the basics wrong. 

    ""I can never be who I ought to be until you are who you ought to be, and you can never be who you ought to be until I am who I ought to be."--Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

     

    GrrrlRomeo's picture

    Well. Fuck me.

    The flame war I was referring to was actually Maddow flaming Boehner. She made a technical error when she went to correct his, and it came back and bit her on the ass. But goddamn, Maddow made an on air correction, which is something opinion news folks don't often do. Took up quite a bit of air time to do it too.

    I know what a flame war is. I have been on the Internets (intentional error) for, shit, 18 years I think.

    But really. Fuck me. Okay. Just fuck me to hell. I am having one of those days. LOL

    I once mistakenly typed "New York Times" when I was thinking in my head "New York Post." It wasn't that I had mixed the two up because I know they are very different papers. While typing a post criticizing the "New York Post," I was actually thinking in my head "New York Post" but typed out "New York Times." I don't know why I did it, but it's possibly because I've typed "New York Times" more times that it was just like muscle memory.

    If you've never called someone by the wrong name, or called an object by the wrong name...well, I guess you're just a more superior and supreme being than I.

    My own Mother has called me by the dogs name. LOL And that is, as far as I'm concerned, a verbal typo. Or more accurately misspeaking.

    But I do think I understand why you believed I was saying you were flaming. I'm an abstract thinker and you're a linear thinker. 

    _____________

    Tweet: @GrrrlRomeo

    TampaStephie's picture

    OMG

    GrrrlRomeo, are you thinking what I'm thinking?  Someone whose posts are so thorough and anal must be a laugh riot on a date...

    ysubassoon's picture

    A rebuttal courtesy of the Onion

    Click on the link. 

     http://www.theonion.com/content/news/area_man_passionate_defender_of

    "I can never be who I ought to be until you are who you ought to be, and you can never be who you ought to be until I am who I ought to be."--Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

    ~H~'s picture

    There Must Be Some Misunderstanding...

    I know ysubassoon and while I don't know you personally, grrrlromeo, I've read enough of your posts to know that you are both abstract thinkers and that you are both known for writing very intelligent...well-constructed...and well thought out posts that allow the rest of us to ponder what you have to say.

    In this case, it appears that there is a misunderstanding, which can happen with the written word (no matter how carefully constructed). Oddly enough...this whole thread seems to revolve around misunderstandings and mistakes, so I hope we can chalk this up to the subject matter...the effect of the moon...or anything other than a personal reflection on either of you. You are both, in my humble opinion, quite insightful and I look forward to reading many more of your posts on AfterEllen.
    GrrrlRomeo's picture

    The Misunderstanding

    The misunderstanding is when one assumes (or actually wants to believe) that another person is wrong because they're dumber or don't care instead of giving them the benefit of the doubt that they simply made a technical error and misspoke.

    I am indeed inclined to give someone who is a Rhodes Scholar with a phD in political science the benefit of the doubt. I do assume that a person who decides to study US policy does actually care about the Constitution. And I assume if she didn't care she wouldn't have bothered to correct herself.

    I'm not particularly passionate about the proverbial comparing of dick sizes in this instance, or the weird territorial pissing around The Documents. But I do think it's funny and entertaining. If it makes ysubassoon feel better, I concede her dick is bigger than mine, Rachel Maddow's, John Boehner's and Ali Davis's combined. The prize is sole ownership over both the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. You earned it. We shall never speak of your sacred documents again.

    Happy?

    _____________

    Tweet: @GrrrlRomeo

    sunnyday's picture

    "I hold out a modicum of hope ...

     

    ...that you will see reason when it is placed before you."

    Ha, that's rich!

     

    Still hopeful? 

     

    If not, at least you've apparently won the biggest dick contest. 

    Which is surprising, because GrrllRomeo, you seem to find a lot of fault in other people's posts, whether it exists or not.  Your concession in the 'biggest dick' contest was pre-mature.

    PD's picture

    Breathe easy; the apocalypse is cancelled!

    http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/press/global_warming_not_catastrophic....

     

    “There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition.” – Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

    You know, if it weren't for the imminent global taxation currently being ushered in by all the crazy hysteria, I too may find the Gore shenanigans perversely amusing. (“Idling Hummer, cooking up a steak with a portable hair dryer...” You forgot the roar from the engines of his squadron of private jets as they performed aerobatics overhead!) Sadly though (and feel free to brand me a hopeless kill joy) the likely extensive further knock in Western living standards and the ban on third world industrialisation that will result from all this climate baloney rather throws a spanner in the works of the old hilarity gland I find.


    PS Ever heard of the Medieval Warm Period? If not, do Google it! Marvel in the tales of all the glorious cathedral building that went on here on these damp little islands once known as the UK. Even better, tease your taste buds at the thought of all those bonus vineyards! (Some found as far north as the north of England!) Damn those serfs must have been going hell for leather with their CO2 belching wood burning stoves to jack up the average temperature by whopping 4-5C!