|
Don’t
Quote Me: Unattractive Lesbians
by Kim Ficera,
July 14, 2005 |
| Kim
Ficera’s bi-weekly column Don't
Quote Me is dedicated to all the folks in and out of Hollywood
who talk without thinking or who don't know when to stop talking. |

Ivette (left) with her girlfriend Maggie
|
“It’s
just so vulgar, you know…such a vulgar word…
lesbian.
“
[I want to offer] a different perspective of what gay
women look like, although The L Word is doing
that already. Everybody's got this stereotype for girls—they
don't see that some girls can like girls and still be
feminine, and still be chic, and still care about their
appearance.”
—
Ivette, Big
Brother 6 cast member, in an interview
on CBS.com posted this month
|
Ivette,
the first out
gay female contestant on the Big Brother reality
series, has opened her mouth and inserted Carrie Bradshaw’s
entire shoe collection. She might be a pretty, chic, and
feminine lesbian (excuse the vulgarity), but she isn’t
a very thoughtful one. Nor is she all that hip—the
world has been offered a “different perspective of
what gay women look like” for quite some time now,
pre-L Word,
on and off TV.
Where
has Ivette been? Not at charm school.
Ivette
speaks as though she’s the first “lipstick”
(her noun, not mine) to be on television, but she’s
not. She speaks as if Portia
De Rossi is a dream and lesbians on the other side of
the spectrum aren’t concerned with hygiene. What
it appears Ivette is offering viewers is not a new, more
glamorous perspective of lesbians, but a revealing peek
into a timeworn and much more grim corner of lesbianism—shame.
Remember,
she made the leap from “lesbian” to “vulgar,”
I didn’t.
But
let’s back up the truck for a minute. While
it might be possible that Ivette is as arrogant and self-absorbed
as she sounds, I suspect that she is not. I doubt that she
meant for her words to sound so…horrible. It’s
not all that easy to be interviewed, after all. It’s
often hard to think on your feet, to come up with perfect
words when a camera is rolling.
I believe, rather, that Ivette was absolutely well intentioned--guilty
of immaturity, self-promotion, and inarticulate delivery,
not necessarily malice.
I
think she was saying that she hopes to shine a brighter
and (gulp) prettier light on lesbianism. She feels a need
to do her part to wipe out the old and ugly stereotypes
that feed off of some of us like mold on cheddar.
Or,
maybe she was trying to say that she is no less a lesbian
just because she is pretty and chic.
Whatever
her point, she failed miserably in her effort to express
it well. As a result, she left the door wide open to conjecture.
And it’s through that door we wander and subsequently
wonder if insecurity is at the root of her seemingly subconscious
hostility.
This
is very sticky ground—a gooey passage that I am, admittedly,
not qualified to navigate. Unlike Tom Cruise, I don’t
know the history of psychiatry.
Still,
I can speculate.
|
|
|
|