Page
1 / 2 / 3
- Next
Me
thinks the lady doesn’t like sex. At the very least,
she’s threatened by staged plastic people poised ready to
engage in a form of staged sex that doesn’t mirror her view
of what staged sex between plastic people should look like.
Okay,
I understand that; we all have hang-ups. I’m admittedly a
little uncomfortable around clowns. But Lafferty’s protest
begs the questions, Is there anything that Christian conservatives
aren’t afraid of? and Why the hell aren’t these people afraid
of one another?
Serial
killers, rapists, crazy people with sharp objects, cancer,
nightmares, well-made horror movies, large bugs, vicious animals,
and thermo-nuclear war are all very scary. Malls? Mannequins?
Not so much.
But
don’t try to tell that to Marti Ross of West Springfield,
Virginia. She apparently believes that Victoria’s Secret is
the gateway to Hell. When she saw the window display, she
told Matthew Barakat of the Associated Press, “It feels like
evil, feels like I have to cross the evil to get to the light."
Steina
Rubin of Bethesda is just as concerned with what she witnessed
at the mall, and also shocked at her own reaction. She told
The Washington Post “I’m not entering a whorehouse.
I come to the mall with my daughter. It’s disgusting and I’m
from Europe!”
Yes,
Europe — the boil on the ass of the world, apparently.
But
twenty-two year old Victoria’s Secret shopper Jennifer Kern
saw it differently. According to the McLean Connection,
she thinks people are overreacting to the display. “I like
the way it looks,” she said. “It is really different from
other stores and it has a lot more variety. The lingerie on
the models is sexier, but I mean, they are not real people
— they are mannequins.”
Exactly.
Mannequins.
Another
shopper, Iyon Rosario, told The Washington Post, "I
love it… Every woman has a little bit of the dark side in
her…The mannequins aren't real. I have a husband, and I know
he would love this. This is what keeps you happily married.”
Bingo!
The
only lesbians in Victoria’s Secret’s windows are in the
eyes of the beholders. Some shoppers see ‘happily ever after’;
some see a life-size diorama of the “lesbians” that straight
men enjoy looking at in magazines and videos; and others,
like Ms. Lafferty and her uptight supporters, see the “lesbians”
of Sodom. But in reality, what everyone is reacting to is
the depiction of girl on girl sex — straight girl on
straight girl sex.
That
truth is a buzz kill for Lafferty and her homophobic clan,
but it’s hardly a revelation to her or anyone else. In the
same way Dorothy always knew how get out of Oz without the
help of a fairy princess, straight folks know how escape a
stale sexual relationship with out the help of a real lesbian.
They’ve been doing it for years.
I
want to have faith in the horny yet homophobic public. I want
to believe that one day soon everyone will admit to knowing
the difference between real lesbians, plastic lesbians, porn-video
lesbians and TV lesbians. But I doubt that will happen soon.
The fantasies are too valuable to give up — valuable to everyone
except lesbians, that is.
Lafferty
will continue to morph fiction into fact to further her Christian
conservative agenda and keep the world safe from homosexuals;
men are apparently hard-wired, unable to dislodge themselves
from the notion that lesbians desire and need them; and advertisers
and the media know that there’s a lot of money to be made
at the expense of the “L” word.
All
except lesbians are profiting off a lie or, at the very least,
a gross exaggeration: a lesbian’s life mirrors a porn video.
And this type of exploitation makes me wonder if there’s ever
been another group of people who have been so publicly and
equally disliked and desired at the same time — all as a result
of the same distorted premise.
|