Find Articles On:
 TV Shows:
 Movies:
 People:
 Extras:

BBC America's Tipping the Velvet Cheats Viewers
Lisa Yimm, August 2003

Nan (Rachael Stirling) and Kitty (Keeley Hawes) Nan (Rachael Stirling) and Kitty (Keeley Hawes)
Diana Lethaby (Anna Chancellor)
Florence Banner (Jodhi May)

Given the leaps and bounds we’ve made in the inclusion of lesbian and gay characters on TV today, I was completely floored by BBC America’s May presentation of Sarah Water's novel "Tipping the Velvet." It seemed as if the community standards of Victorian London depicted in the three part mini-series were then used as the gauge for the "acceptable" amounts of sexual content allowed to grace our screens when finally shown here in the States.

I have to admit that I am not your average viewer. I’m probably more media savvy than the average American television viewer, and as a bisexual woman, I have a vested interest in gay, lesbian, or bisexual content on TV. So I had been eagerly awaiting my chance to see Tipping the Velvet ever since its smashing debut in England.

Based on the Water's novel, the television mini-series chronicles the romantic adventures of a young woman named Nan (played by Rachael Stirling) in the 1890's as she falls in love with Kitty, a male impersonator (played by Keeley Hawes) who breaks her heart, then is seduced by wealthy widow Diana Lethaby (played by Anna Chancellor), and eventually finds love with Florence (played by Jodhi May), a young woman of modest means who takes Nan in when she has nowhere else to go.

But after eagerly watching the long-awaited first episode of this much-celebrated UK series, I found myself disappointed and outraged. Now, some months later, I've had time to mull it over and re-watch my tape of the three-part series in it's entirety--and I'm still outraged.

BBC America's much-touted broadcast of Tipping the Velvet was marred by poorly executed cut-aways and censorship unbecoming of the BBC. On top of that, there were far too many commercials (averaging 3 minutes per break) for a 60-minute time slot, which seems designed to hide the fact that, unbeknownst to most viewers, 59 minutes of the original production was cut for the U.S. showing.

In the weeks leading up to the May 23rd premiere in the U.S., there was a serious media push to hype the show. The May 13th issue of The Advocate featured a rather lengthy and detailed interview with series star Rachael Stirling, giving us all the gory details as to what Nan would be up to and how Stirling's mother, Dame Diana Rigg, reacted to seeing her daughter bare all. The June issue of Curve Magazine gave it cover space with their headline “BBC Does Drag: Tipping the Velvet on TV” and a two page story included within.

Even the mainstream press jumped on the bandwagon. The San Francisco Chronicle published not one, but two, stories – the first appearing in the May 18th Sunday Datebook section and the second a review by Chronicle critic Tim Goodman appearing the day of the first episode.

Why make such a fuss if in the end the viewers will know that they were cheated? All of the stories gave details of the rather risqué nature of the sex scenes and commented on their reception in England--most of which did not show up in the U.S. version.

When it finally hit the airwaves, each episode of Tipping the Velvet was preceded by "The following scenes contain material of a sexual nature...viewer discretion is advised." What scenes? There might have been some, if they hadn't done such a hack job with editing. Are BBC America that afraid of upsetting our delicate sensibilities? In the end, it simply made them look silly.

Maybe I'm jaded and over-reacting. As someone who grew up watching Masterpiece Theatre on my local PBS affiliate, I've always thought that the British had a less puritanical view of sex than we did. And certainly, here in the States, cable TV has pushed the envelope on acceptable "community standards" of sex and violence to the point that I expected to see Tipping the Velvet in all it's unexpurgated glory.

By comparison, there was more graphic sex on TV in PBS’ showing of I, Claudius twenty years ago; and there was certainly more content of a “sexual nature” in the last television season. Not only do we have Six Feet Under and Queer As Folk on cable, but we had more bare flesh and lesbian content on primetime TV in the just-concluded season of Buffy the Vampire Slayer than was finally shown in Tipping the Velvet.

Since it serves no purpose to bitch about censorship and not do something constructive about it, I filled out the feedback form on the BBC America website and received this polite reply:

Thank you for your interest in BBC America. When it comes to matters of
content and language we are feeling our way in an unfamiliar market and
fine judgments have to be made. Sensitivities here are different from
those in Europe - and while guarding the integrity of our programming we
do not want to offend viewers. Feedback like yours is extremely valuable
in informing this process as the channel moves forward, so thank you for
taking the trouble to write to us.

Regards,
Viewer Relations
BBC America

Clearly, the folks at BBC America haven't been watching primetime U.S. television lately if they believe lesbian sex scenes will "offend" viewers--the lesbian sex scene on Buffy in May, the lesbian episode of Fastlane, the extremely explicit lesbian sex scenes on Queer as Folk and The Wire as well as on the upcoming series The L Word all illustrate the trend in America towards more openness and inclusion, not less.

Perhaps BBC America's editors should spend a little less time watching British television and more time watching ours before making these kinds of judgments in the future.

NOTE: AfterEllen.com is not affiliated with Ellen DeGeneres or The L Word
Thoughts? Feedback?
comments@afterellen.com
Copyright © 2006 AfterEllen.com