| When
actress Camryn Manheim
introduced her long-time friend Ann Cusack as "my girlfriend"
at an April 14th charity event in Beverly Hills,
CA, she apparently had no idea the firestorm of speculation that
would erupt from her use of that adjective--but she probably should
have.
Although
many straight women use the term "girlfriend" loosely
to refer to female friends, it means something different for lesbians
(or suspected lesbians); it wasn't just the word "girlfriend"
that fueled speculation that Manheim and Cusack were lovers, however,
it was also the fact that the women were holding hands when Manheim
said it.
As
an out feminist, Manheim is a rarity in Hollywood. She
speaks out against American's obsession with thin women, as well
as sexism, homophobia, the anti-abortion movement, and religious
extremism, and is an activist on a variety of issues, including
gay rights and women's rights.
She
is currently gracing the cover of the Spring 2003 edition of Ms.
Magazine (along with Whoopi Goldberg, Margaret Cho, and Ashley Judd)
wearing a t-shirt with the slogan "This is what a feminist
looks like."
Most
actors are rebels of some sort, of course, and they are a notoriously
liberal lot, but few actresses have the
luxury of wearing their feminism on their sleeve if they want to
continue working--especially if they're not married (to a man).
When
she chose to have a child on her own in 2001, Manheim incurred the
wrath of male reporters around the country, who blasted her for
echoing in real life the view espoused by her character on The
Practice: "I don't believe I need a man in my life to
raise a happy, healthy [child]."
Although
there are valid reasons for asserting that two parents
can be better than one, many reporters revealed the real basis of
their arguments--sexism--through snarky comments like this one in
a Tucson Weekly article:
"Camryn
Manheim considers herself a trailblazer. But if she had intentionally
gotten herself pregnant five years ago, before she was a star,
she'd have been just another pathetic loser who could only keep
a man interested in five- and 10-minute spurts (if you'll pardon
the expression)."
Manheim,
as an unmarried straight woman who refuses to downsize
her weight or her opinions, is consequently a prime target for the
"lesbian" label. If another type of woman had made the
same comment as Manheim--a woman who wasn't such an outspoken feminist,
or was markedly heterosexual (or was thin)--you would likely see
a very different result.
If Pamela Anderson, for example, had walked that red carpet holding
hands with a long-time female friend and introduced her as "my
girlfriend," no one in the press would speculate that Anderson
was about to come out. Ditto Ashley Judd, who is a feminist but
is also married and thus clearly "needs" a man; in a similar
situation, there would be no media articles asking if she were a
lesbian.
There
might be a few suggestive comments, or a National Enquirer article
speculating on Anderson or Judd's sexuality in that situation, but
mainstream media outlets would never run with the news the way they
did when it was Manheim.
I'm
not suggesting there was any kind of orchestrated attempt
to discredit Manheim by calling her a lesbian, but rather that in
their rush to prove that only a lesbian would behave the way Manheim
does--to crow triumphantly "See! We knew she was a lesbian!--many
reporters read into her behavior what they wanted to see,
in a way they never would have if the statement were made by someone
else.
But
rather than revealing Manheim's sexual orientation, articles like
the Chicago Sun-Times's "Has 'The Practice' star come out of
the closet?" really just represent a manifestation of the patriarchal
fear of a woman who doesn't "need" a man.
This
whole thing is especially silly given that if Manheim were
to come out, she is not the kind of woman likely to do so by dropping
coy hints that require interpretation; Manheim has consistently
proven herself to be nothing if not direct on many subjects including
sexual orientation, as she illustrated in her 1999 memoir "Wake
Up, I'm Fat!":
"Amid all those wonderful dykes, I had had a revelation.
I was not a lesbian. I wanted to be a lesbian. I tried to be a
lesbian, and God knows I would have been a great fucking lesbian.
I mean, after all, I lived in Santa Cruz, I had a motorcycle,
I was an activist, a liberal, an artist, a feminist, I love women,
they love me, fat and all, and my sister always said I would be
one. I even gave it the good old college try. Not once, but twice.
It would have been so easy if I could have been a lesbian. But
no, I had to settle for heterosexuality, which, as some of you
know, is no day at the beach."
Manheim
tried to ignore the rumors about her and Cusack at first,
but when they persisted she finally issued
a statement which, characteristically,
refuted the media's interpretation of her comment without reinforcing
the homophobic notion that it is a terrible thing to be "accused"
of being gay:
"The
only problem with Annie and I being lovers--because, trust me,
that would be fabulous, is that I am not gay and neither is she.
I may have said, 'This is my girlfriend,' but can we not say we
have been girlfriends now? She's been my best friend for years."
Was
Manheim naive to think her "girlfriend" comment wouldn't
be misinterpreted? Absolutely. But it's just this kind of insistence
on ignoring the rules of convention that has gotten Manheim to where
she is today--and one of the reasons she continues to be a great
advocate for women of all sexual orientations.
|