High
Art
(1998) is a self-conscious and haunting
examination of two lives that intersect, painfully
and without mercy. Writer/director Lisa Cholodenko, in an ambitious
feature film debut, has written a screenplay that doesn't just show
her characters and their lives, it meticulously scrutinizes them,
pointing out every flaw, every weakness, every strength, every misstep.
Under
the bright lights of this dissection and examination sits Syd (Australian
actress Radha Mitchell), a young girl trying to make it in the cutthroat
and personality-deficient world of photography magazine editing.
In one of those cinematic coincidences we've learned to love and
accept (and really this is the only leap of faith the director asks
us to make), Syd just happens to live downstairs from off-beat cult
photographer Lucy Berliner (a not-a-moment-too-soon comeback role
for the gorgeous Ally Sheedy).
Lucy,
who made a splash in the photography world a decade
before, has turned her back on the art world in disgust, falling
haphazardly into a heroin-riddled haze, together with some friends
and a girlfriend, Greta (Patricia Clarkson). Meeting Syd reawakens
things inside Lucy that she thought she had lost: real passion for
another human being, and a liking of herself and ambition in her
life and her art.
As
the two women become drawn together they also leech off each other,
with Lucy gradually climbing out of her self-obsessed, drug-induced
stupor while showing Syd that other worlds live and breathe outside
of her ambitious, job-focused existence.
But
Lucy isn't as strong as Syd, and finally her isolation from the
world and her constant need to escape overwhelm her, despite the
pull of Syd's honest yet naive adoration.
The
characters of High Art are dissected to such a minute degree
that it makes us squirm, almost as if we're seeing too much. Our
voyeuristic tendencies are fed generously as the film shows us a
slice of life that is both fascinating and horrible to watch.
This
could have backfired: if the characters weren't so full and developed
this technique would have simply highlighted the flaws in the screenplay.
As it is, despite everything that we see, we end up feeling that
we've actually been allowed to witness only an inkling of their
lives--that there's even more depth and carnage to be explored underneath
the cracked and wrinkled veneer.
Films
that have photography or filmmaking as
part of the plot almost invariably become self-referential
and explore what it takes to create the photographic image
as art. High Art is no different. As Lucy says to Syd,
"I haven't been deconstructed in a while." Not only are
the characters picked to pieces, but so is the photographic image
and the reasons behind creativity. The construction and appreciation
of imagery at all levels is scrutinized, with Cholodenko having
very little good to say about the so-called elite of the art world.
Isolation
is everywhere in this film. It lingers in the lighting and sparse
sets, the awkwardness of conversations, relationships and the harshness
of the competition in Syd's repressive office. Only Lucy's photography,
and the feeling when Lucy and Syd are together, give us any relief
from the repressive atmosphere that fills every centimeter of the
screen.
Of
course everything in this film screams that how
we present things, how things are framed, means everything. In case
we missed that point, the magazine Syd works on is even called "Frame."
People, objects and to some extent even dialogue in the picture
are all in the exact right place. Lucy's apartment is a treasure
trove, an intimate look into her mind that can only be gauged by
seeing the things she surrounds herself with. A simple scan of her
apartment reveals so much about Lucy, which is why the camera spends
so much time sweeping in a circular motion, lingering on important
details.
Cholodenko
is a scholar of the visual image, as she aptly demonstrates in this
film (and later, in Laurel Canyon).
High Art is a dense film and many people may find the going
difficult, not to mention downright depressing. It's certainly not
a film I watch to make a happy evening brighter. It does however
contain intense emotional connections.
Just
watching this tender, fragile relationship developing--where you
know everything can and will fall apart at any moment--gives an
immense level of satisfaction. When Lucy gives Syd the series of
pictures she has developed of her for submission to Syd's magazine,
saying "This is it - it's all about you right now," you
just know something has grown between them that neither of the characters
has even grasped yet. That this is the last time they will see each
other is unthinkable.
Despite
the oppressiveness of the film, I found
some hope in the ending. I don't think it is Cholodenko's intention
to show that love fails or that dedication to your goals is ultimately
pointless. Real progress is made by every character in the film
(except perhaps Greta, whose hopeless existence simply highlights
the progress Lucy has made).
The
isolation Syd and Lucy felt was overcome, if only for the briefest
of moments, and we know Syd will no longer throw away her talent
and ambition on anything not worthy of her, not now that she knows
what passion and love really mean, and how easy a thing life is
to waste.