|
Warning: watching Frida may lead
to an intense desire for tango lessons and large bottles of
tequila. Frida is Frida Kahlo, the legendary Mexican artist
and socialist who was born around 1910. She was married to
the equally larger than life muralist Diego Rivera. She had
a tempestuous relationship with Diego, an art career that
took her all over the world, and a notorious social life before
her early death in 1954.
Frida,
patron saint of hirsute drag queens, has evolved in the popular
imagination to such a mythic level that any movie about her
is destined for intense scrutiny and critique.
She is supremely iconic for both Latina/os and queers because
of her ability to honor and challenge the traditions of her
culture while espousing new ideas and concepts in political
philosophy, sexuality, and art. In a way she has bridged these
two conflicting cultures post-mortem.
The
biographic film Frida opens with the rich
colors of an interior landscape. Frida (Salma Hayek) is set
up in her bed like one of her paintings, and the self-reflective
theme of her art is symbolized through the mirror set over
the bed. The Oscar-nominated Hayek plays both the younger
and older Frida, and she does a fantastic job as both the
idealistic, intellectual youngster and the mature, world-weary
artist. We are introduced to Diego Rivera (Alfred Molina),
her future husband and lecherous but charming older artist,
before her life-changing accident at age eighteen. She is
involved in a major accident that involves a metal rod piercing
her back and breaking her pelvis. She has multiple injuries
from this accident and ends up in a body cast for a long time
with bouts of chronic pain for the rest of her life. But this
accident ignites her artistic career, which is still celebrated
today. The film depicts this contradiction of fate not just
through her life, but with the beautiful and tragic surroundings
of Mexico that it is set in.
Early
on in the film, Frida asserts her difference and sexual liberation
by having sex with her boyfriend in her parents’ home
and posing for a family portrait in a full suit, dressed as
a man. This is in 1920s Mexico--a conservative Catholic country,
so it is unexpected to see her father (Roger Rees) dote on
her shocking behavior, even going so far as to joke about
her cross-dressing with “I always wanted a son.”
The
film touches on the major points of her life, but
it primarily focuses on her relationship with Diego. This
is a little disappointing since she is so well known as a
bisexual woman. The only scenes that show her with women are
set in a very masculine erotic frame. The first involves winning
a drinking game in order to dance with the stunning hostess
and photographer, Tina Modotti (Ashley Judd), at a party.
Frida subverts the macho posturing by taking the biggest drink
uninvited, then performing a sensual tango with “the
prize.” This scene is sexy because it is two beautiful
women dancing together, but it also seems very superficial.
The
second film moment capturing Frida’s intimate interaction
with a woman is her revenge fuck with a Parisienne singer
in order to to get even with Diego. Both scenes are thrown
into the movie for titillation as opposed to taking a meaningful
look at her relationships with women outside of the marriage
to Diego. This is disappointing for a biographic film of her
life since it minimizes her non-heterosexual relationships.
I also found it a little odd and disconcerting that the film
is in English, but the actors all have pronounced Mexican/Spanish
accents. I’m not sure why the director/screenwriters
didn’t just make the film in Spanish, but it makes things
easier for the non-Spanish speakers.
Despite
these gaps, this is still a fantastic movie. It shows
Frida as a strong woman who spent her life dealing with physical
pain, and was miraculously not only able to walk and dance
again after massive injury, but transform that pain into art
that is so popular it is still mass-produced and immediately
recognizable over 50 years later. The film skillfully weaves
in many of the elements of magical realism that are the trademarks
of her art, via the use of puppetry and collage-like cinematography.
These moments come up unexpectedly and suggest what the creative
process might have been like for Frida.
The
soundtrack is fantastic, the actors are easy on the eyes,
and the period costumes and sets made me want to run off to
Oaxaca. This is a lush, gorgeous movie that, in spite of its
flaws, is well worth a view.
Get
Frida on DVD
|