7 Reasons Why Rosie Had to Leave "The View"3. She's too loud. Though this was one of the more common complaints about Rosie, I think it's just funny. Was Rosie actually louder — I'm talking decibels here — than her co-hosts? If so, shouldn't we blame the sound guy? Of course, the naysayers really mean "loud-mouthed," because everyone on The View has yelled at one time or another. The real problem is that Rosie refused to let things go, back down or make nice. But the truth is that when she was at her most loud-mouthed and boorish, she was mocking Donald Trump. 2. She's a lousy spokesperson and an easy target. As the recent spate of comments on the AfterEllen.com blog proves, Rosie's "sisters" are no less polarized than the Nielsen crowd. Many of us have valued her for her visibility not as the gay voice but as a gay voice. But others say she gives "us" a bad name. I think there's a larger point here: There is no "us." Even if Rosie were to try to speak for a group, she'd be a mouthpiece without a movement. During the Don Imus scandal, Rosie wondered why there was no reaction from the women's movement. Al Sharpton spoke up, she noted, but where was the modern-day Gloria Steinem? Unfortunately, there really is no modern-day women's movement or gay movement to speak of or for — so the spokesperson point is moot. And if it's good that we're diverse and complicated and have too many perspectives to form a unified movement, then the answer is that more voices are necessary, not a single, perfect representative. The homophobes and Fox pundits are really to blame for this one. They've forced Rosie to stand for the gay community. That's because they don't really have many options: Who else is so visibly out? And the conservative cabal will keep using Rosie to prove their points until she shuts up altogether. Then they'll just find somebody else. 1. She's too real. It all comes down to this. Rosie is too real to fit the standard celebrity molds. She's both a mess and a saint, and that confounds the hype machine. She's overweight; she loves Broadway; she's against the war; she's worried about autism; she's prone to malapropism; she's too tall for those standard-issue chairs. Shortening the chair legs made her fit in visually, but she was still a misfit on all other counts.
Some have called her insecure and uncomfortable in her own skin, and Joy pointed out that Rosie both loves and hates attention. That's because, to quote Harold and Maude, consistency is not really a human trait, and Rosie is human above all else. Her reaction to the split-screen snafu seemed petulant and unreasonable to many, but to her, it was clear: She'd had enough. Once the Queen of Nice, Rosie has become the Queen of Instinct, and that guarantees a difficult career in an industry that favors image over impulse. Rosie figured it out as she went along, and she eventually figured out The View wasn't the right place for her. I'm not sure where she belongs, but I'm glad she lets us see even the clunkiest misstep as she follows her convoluted path. Her wanderings are vastly more engaging than the tentative, sedate discussions of paparazzi and porn, which is what the first post-Rosie View gave us. (You could almost hear the collective lunging for the remote.) I'll tune in for whatever Rosie does next, because I'd rather be wincing at Rosie's latest gaffe than yawning at someone else's tepid chatter. For nine short, scintillating months, The View had vision. Now it just has a void. |
Recent blog posts
New forum topicsActive TopicsNew Comments
|



Seven
Thanks for the heads up
If Disney comes up with a new Bermuda Adventure experience, it's for damned sure I'm not getting on it now.
more voices, indeed...
“I think there's a larger point here: There is no "us."
“…[u]nfortunately, there really is no modern-day women's movement or gay movement to speak of or for — so the spokesperson point is moot. And if it's good that we're diverse and complicated and have too many perspectives to form a unified movement, then the answer is that more voices are necessary, not a single, perfect representative.”
I couldn’t agree more. And this is one of the best lessons, IMO, to take away from this whole Rosie incident. Anyone who thinks lesbians are a monolithic group – politically, culturally, or otherwise – isn’t paying attention. This forum alone, and the discussions about Rosie, prove that. There is no single, perfect representative for lesbians and even if there were, it wouldn’t be Rosie.
In a way, Rosie became a “default” spokesperson because there really isn’t anyone else out there (and yes, I love Ellen, but for better or worse, she’s pretty quiet). I’ve said all along I’m not a huge fan of Rosie but I give the woman props for speaking out and taking risks. Saying things that need to be said even while opening herself up to such harsh critiques. My biggest issues with her are that I wish she’d think first before speaking and I wish she were a little smarter. But the problem isn’t with Rosie per se – it’s with the alarming lack of “other voices” out there.
Nicely said,
"My biggest issues with her are that I wish she’d think first before speaking and I wish she were a little smarter. But the problem isn’t with Rosie per se – it’s with the alarming lack of “other voices” out there. "
I think you nailed it here. Certainly there are a plethora of "other voices" out there--look all over this website--but most of them are not mainstream media, for sure.
Rosie definitely broke the mold by being "the lesbian" who just refused to try and get everyone to like her. I think all too often the problem with the spokespeople for "the movement"; whether they appoint themselves that or not, is that they/we try too hard to placate everyone and not appear as the threatening bulldyke or queen that the whole point gets lost in the charade. Rosie is what she is, but she never apologized for it.
Makes Barbara look pretty brilliant, if you ask me. :)
cool
Rosie definitely broke the mold by being "the lesbian" who just refused to try and get everyone to like her. I think all too often the problem with the spokespeople for "the movement"; whether they appoint themselves that or not, is that they/we try too hard to placate everyone and not appear as the threatening bulldyke or queen that the whole point gets lost in the charade. Rosie is what she is, but she never apologized for it.
ditto. That takes a lot of courage and is refreshing, especially considering how image oriented celebrities are.
I'm With You
I'm definitley with you on that and my last post summed it up just the way you did on Rosie vs Hassel(whoever). I'm not a Rosie fan but I give her props but like I stated before, It's not What you DO but HOW you do it!
And you Scribe... YOU ARE SOOO RIGHT ON THE THERE'S NOT "US". Let's see where we go from here.
As for the TOO sensitive bit, you're correct too. This is one of the main reasons why she came off as being insecure. My opinion is that Rosie needs to mature, it's obvious that she hasn't and that's what throws off a lot of good that she could have done, she really needs to grow up.
Robin, Ellen and Rosie
i totally predicted she
Tipping my hat
What a lovely tribute,Scribegrrl. You totally nailed it.
I think most people - yeah, even the haters - will really miss Rosie.
Rosie needs help
we think we didn't realise
Omg, please
by all means -- do contact CPS and make sure you spell your name carefully for them, too.
In the meanwhile, WE will all just sit back and wait for the lawsuits to begin.
Of the countless legitimate examples of bad celebrity parenting (Britney, Michael, Dina Lohan), you want to have Rosie's kids yanked because you think she's suffering from depression. Even though she admits that she's had bouts with depression, has been in therapy for years and is taking medication and doing everything you're supposed to do to deal with it.
Why don't you use some of that righteous indignation for children who are truly living in horrific situations of abuse and neglect whose parents won't admit to their demons or get the help they need?
Or is it more what I suspect and the real problem "we" have with Rosie is that she's parenting while being lesbian.
Gali, we were highly amused. You made us laugh out loud.
thank you deja
So spot on
zainypagan revisionist
Good thing there is a revision!
lesbian without borders
...
oh and...
I like her!
Well anyways, I think it's a shame she's gone. I like watching her.
I'll miss RO
keep it real
well done.
Lets commend her for what she has done right, which maybe more than our community could have ever hoped to do in such a short time. Everyday, she used such words as wife, 2 mommies, lesbian, even to go so far as to speak of her sex life. This was all done on National TV. Almost as if those were words one would use in everyday life in small towns anywhere.
Let us celebrate the social change she was able to get done in less than a year, by being herself, and just putting what that is out there, for all of America to accept into their everyday life, and perhaps, she opened an eye, made someone re-think their fears, maybe she did good, just by being herself.
good lesson for all.
i have to disagree...
Emphasis on "too sensitive"
Rosie is that person in your
I agree
Another Revision
The Rosie O'Donnell show was cancelled because she resigned, not the other way around. I don't recall it ever failing. She left before it could...a few months after she came out publically and they were trying to keep her "gayness" off the show and anything to do with the show. In fact, the last show she did she still couldn't talk about it, and instead Nathan Lane came out...'cause damnit someone had to come out on the show. LOL
But seriously, I so remember the message boards, the official Rosie one on AOL, ANYTHING about her being gay would get deleted instantly by TPTB. I know 'cause I was there and got censored personally. ha!
Then Caroline Rhea took over, and though I enjoy her, it wasn't the same.
As for the second TV show? No clue what you're talking about there. Rosie did a single episode of Will and Grace before Ellen's show started.
I was talking about Ellen
Love Rosie
Awesome post, scribegrrrl, you've totally hit the nail on the head here (7 times!).
I'll miss watching Rosie on The View. For all her faults, I think she's a genuine person and she's awesome. I'll be watching her video blogs, but it's not the same.
I know a big problem for people is that Rosie is a real loudmouth, but the homophobic attitudes among people are really highlighted when all they say after any point she makes is that she's a "fat, ugly, dyke." It's obvious that Rosie can cause controvery before she even opens her mouth because people hate her purely based on the fact that she's an overweight lesbian woman that is proud. People can't stand it and it shows.
Frankly, before Rosie joined The View, I was expecting there to be a big argument between Rosie and Elisabeth in a matter of weeks. But I surprisingly started to warm to Elisabeth a little bit. Although, crappy war politics and annoying voice aside, I've never forgiven her for saying on The View (about gay marriage): "What next? Are people going to be allowed to marry their toasters?" That probably isn't the exact quote but she did say toasters, I swear. And she completely denied saying that when Joy called her on it when Rosie was on... if she'd have admitted it and apologised for it and said that knowing a gay family made her see that she was wrong, then more people would have liked her for it. But she just lied about it and didn't apologise! Ugh. What a witch.
__________________
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
Rosie
"She proudly claimed the beer-drinking, sweatpants-wearing stereotype, and she talked about her sex life. Some call that damaging to the gay community. I just call it being out."
Rosie lets the public inside of her life to the most intimate degree. In a way that most of us would only share with close friends or family. (Or, not at all.)
I feel like she's has sacrificed herself emotionally much to the benefit of the GLTB community. While I'm sure that she will remain economically viable, a certain ratings producer, the toll of living under that kind of brutal scrutiny must be crushing.
I am very grateful for what she has done.
I love you all.
http://askalesbian.blogspot.com/index.html
realism at it's best...
my thoughts would be reflected similar to: " I’ve said all along I’m not a huge fan of Rosie but I give the woman props for speaking out and taking risks. Saying things that need to be said even while opening herself up to such harsh critiques."
and i'm not quite sure what the glorified fuss is over Elisabeth...personally, i can't stand her...she's far too agrresively opinionated in a "right-wing" "conservative" sense and everytime i see her perky little miss-know-it-all-and-only-my-opinion-counts face, i want to do her serious harm... Rosie is Rosie...like her or love her...but she IS the ONLY celebrity that is strongly, contently and confidentally open and out...and don't we all wish we had more like her on our side???
But Rosie Didn't "Have to Leave"
I think that was a very nicely worded and a very accurate summation of why Rosie left.
But, I don't think she HAD to leave. And it is there that I fault her. If you are going to be the tough dyke then you better walk the talk. I agree she is sensitive, and she can give it out--but she certainly has a hard time taking it.
But, by doing this she played into the hands of Trump and O'Reilly and the rest. As I have mentioned before, this is difficulty women have in general, and it is unfortunate--and that is whey we get walked over.
I disagree with Rosie about most of her politics except gay/lesbian and family issues--but I so much wish she would have sucked it in and stuck around.
Her leaving was bad for lesbians and women in general.
i changed my mind...
people like the preacher at
Hmm
www.myspace.com/emmahuntermusic
What?
Rosie belongs on radio
Rosie O'Donnell's over-the-top personality and style would be better suited to talk radio, I think, than to TV. (I was surprised that her "Ching Chong China" routine didn't make your list.)
i feel very ambivalent about
Teaching Vs Punishment
As I understand it, Rosie couldn't understand why the Imus thing was a race issue and not a feminist issue because the attack was more on their womanhood than their race. The black community does have more leverage than feminists and gays. But I don't think that should be confused with "power" per se. The media doesn't really pay attention to the complaints of feminists and gays.
And I don't think I need to tell you that there's as much homophobia within the black community as there is racism in the gay community. It's unfortunate because we should all be on the same side. But when I hear things like Isaiah Washington should be excused for saying the f word because gay white men are priviledged and racist, it's disturbing.
I don't think she was being hypocritical at all because there's a difference between objecting to something someone has said, and getting them fired in order to silence them.
I also don't think Rosie is intentionally racially insensitive, and that's not an excuse by any means, but sometimes someone just doesn't realize that something is inappropriate and they should be given the chance to learn. The Ching Chong thing was wrong, but I also don't think she'll ever say it again.
I think it comes down to teaching versus punishment. If minorities focus more on teaching each other what's inappropriate we can all come down on the same side a little more enlightened. We have a commonality in being disenfranchised and that's a start in understanding. But if we're more interested in punishing each other, we'll never be on the same side.
Mirror Mirror
First, I have to say that I excitedly follow some of the discussions that happen on this site - its so great on so many levels (intellectually, emotionally, mentally and even physically as I do excercise my abs every now-and-then, laughing so hard!) Since I don't have friends like you in my life, its great that I'm still able to "hear" your opinions and have discourse about them!
Its interesting, when things like this happen, how easily people look at someone's "depicted real life" and start making accusations, or steadfastly showing their support, and pretty much defending either stance based mostly on what was portrayed in the media or a statement taken out of a specific context.
How about each of us looking in the mirror and asking ourselves "What the top 7 reasons are for living our lives the way we do?"
I don't know about the rest of you, but if I had to count the number of times I meant to say one thing one way, and it was understood a different way(category 1), or I actually specifically said one thing/to one person - that I didn't mean to say(category 2)...I'm able to just say "oh, actually, I meant..." and correct myself, and no one, other than the other person(s) would be the wiser for it.
In the case of someone who is being produced on TV - remember that other than the fact that things on TV really aren't necessarily "real" - even the news, they may be saying something that may fit into category 1 or 2 above - so its not the be-all and end-all, nor should it be held as their defining moment(s).
Talk about shattered 'fantasy' - I used to watch the Ellen show religiously when I could - and even sometimes found myself putting my phone on mute during meetings at work(I work from home), just so I could continue to watch the show! I did wish she'd be more political (especially after Rosie came on the View), but I was a hardcore Ellen fan who just wanted to look beyond that. My breaking point came, however, when I recently went to an Ellen show taping. I can't explain to you how disappointed I was after leaving the show - I haven't been able to watch the show since. This is because when we finally got seated in the studio, we were trained on how to 'respond' to everything that Ellen was scripted to say, and then we didn't actually see the person that she announced she had on the show, but we were to cheer like we did! And...there are many more points, but needless to say, the end-result was that I was finally weaned off her show - and pretty much a lot of other TV shows.
This is not a complaint against Ellen, personally. I'm pretty sure that most shows are recorded that way, not just Ellen's, and thats the way "show-biz" goes. But I'd bought into Ellen's obvious charm, warmth and off-the-cuff-like personality that was portrayed on the show that was broadcast. It just turned out that the show really was 'a show' which meant that her 'charm, warmth and off-the-cuff-like personality" was scripted for the Ellen Show. There is a possibility that she really is that same way away from the show in her personal life - but I'm not privy to that.
So my takeaway from this?
* Don't believe "the hype" because it really is.
* Lets grow by learning from other peoples' good and bad examples - and not focus so much on tearing them down or building them up when all they are doing is making mistakes, celebrating victories, and figuring their way through life - just like us! In the Ellen example, I can learn to be show more of my quirkiness and funniness - which is what I liked about her show, and for Rosie, she has taught me that I need to stand up for my opinions, even when it may not be the majority opinion, and to be as "out" in my professional life, as I am in my personal life. Of course, I've learned a lot more - but you'll have to wait for the "TV SHOW"! ;-)
(I'll stop now :-) - this is what happens when you're trying to avoid doing actual work!)
the movements
"Rosie wondered why there was no reaction from the women's movement. Al Sharpton spoke up, she noted, but where was the modern-day Gloria Steinem? Unfortunately, there really is no modern-day women's movement or gay movement to speak of or for."
That's just not true, scribegrrrl. The Feminist Majority and NOW both put out letters asking for Imus to be fired. And I could only accept that second statement if you prefaced it with "monolithic." There is no one spokesperson (or spokesgroup) for feminist or GLBT concerns--but that doesn't mean there aren't still feminist and gay movements, composed of many individuals and groups, working for everything from reproductive rights to gay marriage.
you're right
The new issue of The Advocate has a piece on this topic -- Where is our Sharpton? It asks this question:
"When gays are insulted in the media, we don’t have that one eloquent defender who can mow down our opponents on the national airwaves. Why don’t we have a spokesperson of our own?"
That's what Rosie was asking about the women's movement, and I think it's a fair question for both the women's movement and the gay movement (The Advocate calls the latter "diffuse," which is what I was trying to get at by calling for multiple voices). Interestingly, The Advocate suggests that Rosie and Ellen are our spokespeople, though not on the level of a Sharpton.
Interesting point
I wonder if we don't have this "one defender" because having one person speak for a movement can sometimes be part of the problem--i.e. they speak from one place and one voice and purport to be speaking for all. For example, I think it is not an accident that gay marriage is the cause celeb for "the movement" right now. But gay marriage is not a radical argument. Gay marriage does not, for example, challenge the idea that you have to be married to get health insurance. Universal health care is radical. Gay marriage is just saying gays should have access to the institution too. Gay marriage does not help, for example, 2 poor lesbians who don't have jobs with benefits. (of course, it does have symbolic value, i'm not arguing that).
I am sort of suspect of any one leader who tries to speak for a whole movement. I am a fan of Sharpton's, but I doubt he necessarily speaks to the interest of all persons of color in this country. As we all know, historically in social movements complex, diverse individuals are made to "pick a team"--gay or black? feminist or rich? etc.-- and then ignore other parts of their identity to fight for the "good of the movement."
Of course there are problems to not having that one figurehead who represents a movement, but there are as many problems with having that figurehead too, if you ask me.
(Folks interested in this topic should check out the book "Homocons" - the author discusses that it is not really an accident that the "face of the gays" is white, educated, economically well off, well dressed, and relatively conservative, while the queers, the radicals, the fags, the dykes, are relegated to the metaphorical "back of the bus." A good read.)
7 Reasons Why Rosie SUCKS!!!!!
That's what the title of this article should be! ok, minus #4 and maybe #1...but seriously! I cannot stand this woman. It's embarrassing that she's considered to be a spokeswoman for the lesbian community. She is completely out of control and must be stopped!!!!!
As high profile and overexposed as she is...she has become the voice for us simply by her ability to reach a large audience...creating some stereotype in the process that all lesbians are obnoxious, loud mouthed, unreasonable, overly sensitive, irrational, headstrong, over bearing women.
Is this the impression we want to give people?
Emperor's New Clothes
I want to keep this short and to the point. I hope someone will please step in and help Rosie out. Her mental illness is out of control... going into a downward spiral. I truly believe she needs to have her meds adjusted. I am wondering if she bullies her wife into being too fearful to intercede for her... in any case, I think that woman that was blogging with her, the weekend after she left the show, is taking advantage of a very sick individual. She needs to get some distance from that woman and seek some intense mental health care. Eventually, her children may be at risk from her unpredictable moods and rants. Remember, verbal abuse can be as damaging as physical abuse. I hope someone will help her.
p.s. so much for keeping it short.
Wow.
I'm shocked to find so many adament Rosie-haters or Rosie-extremely-dis-likers. I have loved Rosie from the first time she made me laugh on the Rosie O'Donnell Show. I didn't know she was gay until I read the front page of our newspaper that said she married the love of her life: Kelly, another woman.
And THAT was one of the best days of my life.
She is so real, so down to earth, and she is the one who showed me that it was okay to be comfortable with who I am. I may not agree with everything she says, but she has done a tremendous service to me by being out. And for that I have nothing but gratitude.
Rosie, you are one of my heroes.
Cheers.
Yup that about sums it up
I agree with all of those points
Most importantly number one, After Rosie left The View, it has all but turned horribly boring. I tuned in after months and wow, it is just not the same withotu her, too bad that freedom of speech is not as free as the US law says eh?.
Im super glad to see her coming back on TV though! Ill def tune in.