Review of "Blood Ties"
Also, Blood Ties would do well to stay away from the age-old stereotype of "bisexual woman who doesn't know what she wants," because uncertainty is a large part of Vicki's character. Right at the outset, she appears to be caught between two men, one of whom is a vampire, and she's understandably confused about the new territory she finds herself in with the investigation. As the story progresses, it becomes clear that her attraction to Henry is substantial and that the history she shares with Mike is bleeding into the present. As far as building a series around a strong female lead, Lifetime has done a great job. Vicki's mental and physical abilities are never called into question by any of the male characters surrounding her; it is taken as fact that she is the best at what she does. And Vicki is no stranger to hand-to-hand combat, taking down thugs and demons right from the get-go. She is at the center of the show at all times, commanding the action and just generally kicking butt. It's safe to say that fans of Buffy or The X-Files will probably enjoy Blood Ties. It even has the same '90s feel and some of the endearing cheesiness (and hokey special effects) that featured in those shows at times. It's all very tongue-in-cheek, as the show wisely doesn't take itself terribly seriously. The production values, however, are rather hit or miss, especially the aforementioned special effects. But the cinematography and fight scene choreography are both excellent, evoking a stylized, cohesive direction that the writing sometimes lacks. Also worth noting are the music and sound design elements, which fit right in with both the spookiness and goofiness of the story. However, the '90s vibe is inescapable — and rather inexplicable. Some of the costumes and special effects seem as if they've been lifted straight from 1996. It's only really distracting in the case of the supernatural characters, but it still becomes a glaring problem when a scary villain invokes a giggle instead of a gasp. In the premiere, we come face to face with a major demon, a being who is supposedly so evil and fearsome that he'll bring 1,000 years of darkness to humanity, yet he resembles something out of a cheesy '70s sci-fi movie. Likewise, the supporting characters seem as if they were purchased wholesale from a clichéd TV personality catalogue. Henry is the consummate sexy, suave vampire with murky intentions; Mike is the straight-edged cop with feelings for his ex-partner; and Coreen is a vampire-obsessed college kid. It may be a bit too early to judge, but Vicki is really the only personality that shines above stereotype at this point. Though the show has some growing to do if it's ever to achieve the same kind of cult status that its predecessors enjoyed, it has a solid start with a likable lead, a fun story setup, and the wide open question of Vicki's sexuality. All it needs is to develop the character as she was presented in the novels, spend a little more time on the villains, and stay away from tired monster-of-the-week story lines. If Blood Ties can heat up the screen by taking more chances with Vicki's character (and better exploring her past), then the show will be one to watch. As it stands, it's a fun, though clichéd romp into Buffy's territory. Blood Ties premieres Sunday, March 11, at 9 p.m. EST on Lifetime. |
Recent blog posts
New forum topicsActive TopicsNew Comments
|



Sexy Vicki
I'm soooo excited
I loved the books. I'm really curious what they made of it!!
And Christina IS really HOT!!!!
blood ties
I have read the whole blood series and this review confuses me...girl helper?...sexual idenity?...it must be completely about the tv series, because the book was very clear about vickies sexual preference...and no girl sidekicks...there is a gay black guy..forget his name..nice guy..
I havent seen it yet, comes on tonight, I certainly hope it goes better than the books because I was not happy at all how it all ended..( the series of books) in fact I was so disappointed at how tanya huff treated henry and vicky I have not read one of her books since. Some authors say that their characters take on a life of their own..I dont believe that henry and vicky would have wanted how it all ended. I would rather read LKH who has fallen into a sex filled morass of late with her characters..who seem to have taken over and are giving her nothing but grief...
alas I guess I am just an old romantic..
^^^LKH is a whole 'nother
^^^
LKH is a whole 'nother can of worms. I can't even stand to open one of her newer books anymore, it's a hot mess.
This looks interesting though. I will check it out. And Vicki is certainly hot.
Again, overtly critical
I cannot comment on the presentation of the bisexuality in the books, but to me, Vicky seems all but the cliché of the hesitant, undecisive bisexual woman. She is hardheaded, tough and stays feminine, but she is not hesitant.
Her being torn between two men is a matter of building up suspense, of course, like in any other tv series or book in which a man cannot decide between two women (Phoebus in hunchback of notre dame is a good example from literature), or a (straight) woman cannot decide between two men. I mean, we've all been there, it's just hard to choose, right?
Of course the series is clichéd - it is the vampire series, and it uses the detective+vampire formula that has been done so often. Forever Knight and Angel come to mind, and a new pilot for CBS is being produced as we chat (called 'Twilight'). The plot of the pilot is all but new, but it is being done so good - and the actors are so good, that I'm willing to look past the stereotypes. After all, it's a vampire story. And boy, Henry is hot. :-)
But I fear by removing the bisexuality, the producers take away exactly what steered away from the cliché and explored new territory. But we'll see. There ar some signs that Christina Cox is actually making Vicky behave as a bisexual.
I'm just saying that calling Vicky a stereotype of the hesitant bisexual is selling her way too short. I think it's just a matter of creating suspense. And you've got to think twice when jumping into the pillows with a bloodsucker.
333Halfevil
Blood Ties
My not so pretty opinion on Blood Ties + Vicki's "sexuality"
*warning, may include spoilers for the show and some snark*
I recall an interview done by afterellen where Tanya Huff talks about Vicki's bisexuality. She mentions that Vicki has been involved with one guy and one girl in her past. Sadly she also says that they haven't really included that in the show. I think her more precise words was something along the lines off "well the agreement with the writers are, that they know its there".
On Blood Ties I must admit all it makes me do is miss BtVS and even Blade the series, a show everyone thought would be crap but even the people on TWOP could agree was much better than it should be. Not to mention it had MAD yay!gay subtext between two major characters.
To me Blood Ties incorporate everything cliché and cringe worthy that I feel like shaking my TV. The girl who made her teddy or whatever it was, kill people? A man using a summoned demon to kill? A beast killing innocent people, which Vicki must chase down? Oh for the love of God, this show makes me hope for something more original. I keep expecting the "double Vicki or Henry" episode where there is two of either Henry of Vicki or something equal cringe worthy like where an enemy hires the most notorious hitman to take out Vicki or Henry. I am not even going to go over the characters, just warning, if you are tired of the stereotypical dark mysterious vampire with all the sobs stories in his past you might want to tune out Henry. So far they kept it a bit light with going into him, but that seems to be changing.
At least they planted one or two seeds to create something halfway intriguing, but I still feel they could have done so much more. With the supernatural element there usually are a whole bunch of underground societies, where there rule tons of tensions, power politics, intriguing plots and scheming. None of that has been introduced so far, they just follow a simple formula. Someone dies, Vicki gets on the case, with the help of the rest of the cast more or less, they find out it’s something supernatural and take it down.
Sorry for the long rant, but I been unable to see why some people has called this show something that would rival BtVS. This show is far to uncomplicated and requires nothing for the viewer. There is nothing REALLY pulling you in, because everything is so simplified and predictible. I had really been hoping for a new vampire show to follow after BtVS and Blade tS, but so far this show has offered nothing but a bit eye-candy - and really a show like that should have more to offer. Anyway, just my honest opinion of this show. Although not a very pretty one ^^
Vicki's sexuality
"I recall an interview done by afterellen where Tanya Huff talks about Vicki's bisexuality. She mentions that Vicki has been involved with one guy and one girl in her past. Sadly she also says that they haven't really included that in the show. I think her more precise words was something along the lines off "well the agreement with the writers are, that they know its there"."
Maybe that was a typo and she meant to say Henry who had two lovers, one man and one woman, because like I said in the books(as well as the series) Vicki is straight. Her love interests throughout thhe books are Mike and Henry and she eventually ends up with the former. Henry is the bisexual one in the books. He has a male lover named Tony that was not cast on the series. Maybe next season. If their is one.
Very passing reference
Yus
I've just finished the 4th book and this is the only reference I can think of in the lot.
I went into the books expecting her to be Bi-sexual so I picked this reference out easily. It's the only one I can see.