| Stacy
Codikow is one of the founders of POWER UP, a non-profit organization
with chapters in L.A., New York, and Chicago designed to "promote
the visibility and integration of gay women in entertainment, the
arts, and all forms of media."
Why
did you found POWER UP and are there any other organizations out
there doing some of the same things? How has POWER UP evolved since
its inception?
POWER
UP was created to fill a void in the Lesbian community. As a community,
we lack in resources for women to share or communicate with one
another. We have no restaurants, coffee houses, maybe 3 bars and
a couple “girls” nights here and there. POWER UP is
unique in that it’s a club, were membership means you belong.
A virtual lesbian community, arts, and entertainment center in the
heart of West Hollywood. We are the only non-profit organization
who finances, produces, and distributes films made by our membership
to the industry at large. When we started we thought maybe we would
have a hundred members and get togethers, but quickly we became
a national organization with nearly 900 members and chapters in
Chicago and LA. We plan to launch San Francisco this year.
What
are the membership requirements?
Fill
out an application and make a donation. It’s that simple.
You’ve
had a lot of major corporate sponsors for your events and fundraising
efforts; why do you think these companies are interested in supporting
your organization, and have you encountered any challenges with
this?
Corporations
realize that the gay women’s community is an untapped market
of double income family’s with expendable money that would
be interested in their products. Most companies that we have approached
realize the value of what we do and create and really want to be
a part of it.
How
has the mainstream Hollywood press responded to your organization,
and has this changed over time?
They
have embraced us from the start. The Hollywood Reporter had a ½
page photo of POWER UP with an article about us mentoring women
in their 2000 Most Important Women in Hollywood issue. We have been
included a half a dozen times in both the Reporter and Variety reporting
on such things as the film grant program, our honorary board of
directors, and our mentorship programs.
What’s
the biggest challenge you face as an organization today, and how
is that different from those you faced when you first launched in
2000?
The
biggest challenge is trying to maintain the programs and events
we have become known for and trying to create new opportunities
for our members at the same time. As the group grows it takes on
new faces and creative ideas that we want our membership to realize
and take full advantage of. I guess I am trying to say, the group
grows, shifts, changes, expands and membership needs to keep up
with the possibilities and continue to participate in the evolution.
You
just rolled out the first full-length screenplay competition (in
addition to your existing filmmaking competition); any plans to
expand into even more competitions soon?
Well,
this year we are into our third filmmaking grant program where three
directors are paired with three writers to make three short films.
The feature screenplay competition this summer will also have three
winners who receive money, software and introductions to several
agents and managers. We have had a competition to “shadow”
a director on Six Feet Under and are planning on creating
“shadowing” of writers and directors on a series later
this year.
What
do you base your decision on when choosing winners in your competitions?
The
film grant competition is open to professional members. The scripts
cannot be longer than 15 pages and are judged on the quality of
the writing, the idea, and execution. They can be on any subject
and do not have to be gay themed. All screenplays have the writers
name removed to add a greater sense of non-bias. The tapes are judged
on talent and all filmgrants applications are chosen by the member
of the Honorary Board of Directors. The screenplay competition will
be open to members and non-members alike. These scripts will be
judged on the quality of the best scripts. Again any subject and
do not have to be gay themed.
What
kind of success have your grant winners seen since she started awarding
them?
We
have had grant winners who have written for TV, won the Student
Academy Award, been hired to direct a feature film, hired to write
a screenplay for Universal, but perhaps the most famous over night
success was Angela Robinson’s
D.E.B.S. that was an
official selection of the Sundance Film Festival, the Berlin Film
Festival, got Angela a writing job on The
L Word and is being made into a feature films by Screen
Gems.
You
mentioned in a recent interview that you’d like to see more
films about people who just happen to be gay (like, a gay Jaws
or Sound of Music); do you see any trend in that direction
in Hollywood?
No,
“Hollywood” puts out Boat Trip where straight
guys play gay for laughs--Hollywood makes movies that make fun of
diversity and it sell tickets……I think it will be up
to Gay Hollywood to take on that responsibility.
What
kinds of differences do you perceive in the way movies with gay
male themes are received and promoted versus films with lesbian
characters and themes?
Well,
distributors put more money behind the male films, because they
believe there is an audience. Women have a reputation for not being
an audience. I think that is wrong and all people want to see stories
that depict there world and women could support a bigger release
if the distributors would put the money behind a good film.
What’s
your perspective on how easy or difficult it is to be a gay woman
and work in the entertainment industry, and how has that changed
over time? Does it seem like this varies by job type (i.e. actress
vs. director vs. editor etc.)?
I believe,
if you believe in yourself, your talent and your drive, that you
can make it anywhere. Lots of people feel that they must fit in
and that is what is dictated to them through their career. I have
never felt in my career as a producer and writer that being gay
in anyway hindered my opportunities.
Have
you had any difficulty recruiting board members or even regular
members because they are afraid to be affiliated with such an explicitly
lesbian organization?
An
“explicitly lesbian organization” is not how I see POWER
UP. We have male, female, straight and gay members and supporters.
Our mission is about integration. I suppose if you feel shame you
may not what to be a part of POWER UP, but I think for the most
part women are pleased to know it’s there. That there is a
place for them.
Someone
the other day referred to your organization jokingly as The Lesbian
Mafia (in the sense that you’re all about looking out for
gay women in entertainment); do you think this is idea of gay women
helping other gay women is valued by your members? Any success stories
resulting from the informal networking opportunities you offer members
(rather than the more formal competitions)?
People
should look out for, help and guide anyone whom they believe in.
As gay women we need to empower and support one another. That does
not mean because you are gay you should be entitled to anything
or because you are a member that you should expect anything beyond
what you are willing to put in. POWER UP is about opportunity and
exposure.
Several
of our members have created production companies together, made
films together, hired one another to crew, have gotten jobs writing
for several magazines and our quarterly, had meeting with agents,
managers, producers, we have introduced several members to casting
directors and had pitching opportunities too.
Everyday
is another opportunity for networking, communicating, and advancing,
but you can’t win if you don’t play.
Note:
For more information or to become a member go to Power-Up.net
|